Stanley Meyer > Stan Meyers system 1

the dielectric property of water

(1/6) > >>

outlawstc:
i think this is a good subject to bring up at the moment..   stan claimed to tune into the dielectric properties of water right?  and he says that the dielectric properties are 78.54.. i have searched here and there for deeper meanings in the past but everytime i got caught up in topics like permability.. this time i had a spark in the noggin.. i have been meaning to look up the dielectric properties of ambient air and kept forgetting.. this time i did and i came across this

"Tipler, Paul A. College Physics. Worth, 1987: 467.     "This phenomenon, which is called dielectric breakdown, occurs in air at an electric field strength of about Emax = 3 × 10to the 6th power V/m."     

this calculates to 3 × (10 to the 6th) (V / m) = 3 000 000 m kg s-3 A-1
in SI terms..   

stan says natural waters dielectric properties 78.54  at around 25 degrees C.

in a video stan says that dielectric value is based off ambient airs dielectric and that natural water is 78.54 times more passive then air..

ok so if its 78.5 times more passive that means that it is 3,000,000 / 78.54 =  38197.09702

now thats for a meter of distance.. break it down to mm its 3kv so 78.54 times more conductive then  air we have the equation 3000kv/ 78.54= around 38.2 volts..

so you would think your first pulse should be based off that.. how quick can you ring 38 volts.. in the capacitor and from there you should base you freq?  i think if we focus hard on this subject we will understand the goal of the circuit better..

feel free to speak your minds on this topic

outlawstc:
(http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j243/outlawstc/designparameters.jpg)


this is out of " Process and apparatus for the production of a fuel gas....." patent

Steve:
Sure we join in M. Law.

A dielectric is an electrical insulator that may be polarized by the action of an applied electric field. When a dielectric is placed in an electric field, electric charges do not flow through the material, as in a conductor, but only slightly shift from their average equilibrium positions causing dielectric polarization.

The whole issue with Stan Meyer is that water is a conductor.......

outlawstc:
yes water is a conductor only due to the elements of the contaminate witthin.. other then that it still has its own resistive quality that still remains in the equation of the whole..

stan says that natural waters dielectric value is 78.54 @25 degrees C  since he says natural he is speaking of water with a ppm's of contaminates.. which i think he based off rain water..

so if natural waters dielectric break down is around 38 volts  i see traveling standing waves in the tubes of around 38.. i think you have to have a circuit that can hit 38 volts almost instantanious,, then you create a traveling standing wave of 38 volts.. its traveling standing waves of didlectric break down  its not breaking down in the parallel  capacitance ..  it is traveling up the parellel in wave format just like the flat plate demo cell shows.. 

now if its 38 volts then does that mean you split it to balance out for the negative and positive potentials? if so the you would have +19 and -19 totaling 38 volts to start the reaction of resonanting water into higher states.

Steve:
Mr. Outlaw,

Can you specify for me please what you mean with dielectric break down of watermolecules? What happens accoording to your theory in the water?

Steve

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version