Stanley Meyer > General Stan Meyer topics

Explain Meyers Electrons electronVolts Covalent bond theory

<< < (4/5) > >>

sebosfato:
Meyer talk about the timeshare rate of electrons being changed by the external electric field applied.. He talks about this zero point energy that comes in when we try to slow down the orbit of the electron by distorting it and how it would return to normal orbit energy state by the universal energy coming in.

Penrose calculated that the energy density of space time is tremendous... If u take a look into quincy st clair patents he talk about using fields to distort the space time and manipulate molecules..

I think the covalent switch off is a mechanism still but have to test to see if is real..

I think that horvath used the same path...

It may be about using high voltage pulse in a manner that it switch off the covalent bound in a strong polarized cell

Geometry is key and also circuit design to be able to get the fields where they should and strong enough to happen the covalent switchoff

I believe is about applying a high positive or negative pulse to the inside electrode while having strong electrolysis happening

My idea is that when the molecules are polarized in one direction and you punch it with a reverse polarity pulse of very short duration it would shake the electrons and toss out the hydrogen molecules instead of having to pass current to split them..

Believe is believe and pratic is pratic..

I understand all you wrote steve... I think is correct... But to real flex the molecules some field may be required... We know theres milions of volts electric fields inside the cell at the double layer barrier. Perhapps we could use them

sebosfato:
We must remember that whatever the polarity is water is aways attracted to it... You can see in the kelving droper example... Mostly ions will be polarity sensitive but water molecules work diferent.. Of couse molecules are going to align for a field applied slow.. But oxygen detain 8 protons and 8 electrons of its own. So it has 8 more times atraction to whatever field source than each hydrogen atom... If we imagine a molecule perfect aligned and apply a reverse polarity to it very sharp we would expect the molecules to get fisicaly repeled before fliping.. 

If we apply ac or a very sharp pulses like those the fracture cell circuit provides to it we are shaking the electrons inside the oxigen atom provided that the field is realy there!

Geometry and circuit desing is the only way to get such fields mix inside there.

I think the chokes are there for allowing the field to keep the high voltage charge applied in the inside electrode impeeding it from traveling thru the circuit and reach the outer electrode for it to make any efect... The field inside a cahrged holow metal is zero...

Thats my two cents on it.. 

Meyer talk about the diode as a switching diode and blocking diode this mean to me that he apply ac spikes to achieve this!

Also his chokes must be wise in maintain the charge
So winding direction is fundamental too ... I seen shields in high voltage coils for example...

geon:
Fabio you're not listening to me , the general relativity says that spacetime is torsionless it means that the spacetime has zero skew, imagine a rotating pendulum it has the same properties as a regular pendulum but now the rotational inertia and the elasticity of the string replaces the mass, this rotating pendulum can't exist in spacetime because the spacetime doesn't twist like that however you can still use the linear approach of SR in rotating matter, imagine the electron position annihilation which gives two photons, this means that these particles have the same structure, the electron has charge of -1 , the positron of +1 why is that? the only explanation is that their relative angle is fixed, it means that through natural selection certain matter evolved into what is the electron and proton like complex organism evolved, it also means there are other particles which we haven't explored and this may be true since there are 100s of particles unidentified yet in collision experiments, now the question is what is mass and what is stored in spacetime as mass , there is the rest mass and the relativistic mass or longitudinal mass but there's also transverse mass so in total there are 3 masses and if you count the inertial mass which is not always the same as rest mass there are 4 masses but mass is energy or better yet energy is mass, what is stored in spacetime is energy but like cogs in a clock these don't spin faster on their own, the only way to get the energy out is through fusion or fission it means that the matter waves of the nucleons drop to lower energy states, the matter waves of the nucleons have acquired their energy from creation or the big bang, this is the only spacetime energy you can harvest possibly, the elasticity of spacetime doesn't allow you to store more energy than what you put out, also in experiments if you use wires then the velocity of charges is ultra low some m/s because the wire has billions of atoms as charge carriers the same field creates all fields but with low speed the other fields are almost zero, everyone still things of induction of coils but there is also induction of charges which is what induction of coils is the curvature of the coil adds to induction which is why everyone thinks of induction of curved surfaces, if you do FEMM simulations which uses the 3 maxwell equations of EM but for infinitesimal regions you can get solutions which don't agree with what you get if you do them by hand so to finish with this instead of thinking about wires think about what each charge is doing then add all the fields together, the superposition principle applies to all fields so a cancelling magnetic field is never cancelled

sebosfato:
did you saw his patents? i mean john quincy st clair?

he show some formula... he proposes that using a combination of fields is possible to calculate in a matrix the curvature generated.. and he says it can be used for thrust and other means

all based in his wormhole generator apparently

is hard to tell how he got this stuff patented talking about contact with other civilizations etc,,,

but i understand what you are saying GEON but i also think maybe theres more than what books tells apparently.. we should try to match some of the hard science knowledge with this claims to try understand whats going on.. when i got back to Brazil and into the physics university was for this reason.. meyer talked the language of science and it seemed the most reasonable way to learn it.. and perhaps understand something more.

if patents never exists maybe we would have time machines by now =D
 

tektrical:

--- Quote from: sebosfato on December 14, 2019, 15:38:15 pm ---did you saw his patents? i mean john quincy st clair?

he show some formula... he proposes that using a combination of fields is possible to calculate in a matrix the curvature generated.. and he says it can be used for thrust and other means

all based in his wormhole generator apparently

is hard to tell how he got this stuff patented talking about contact with other civilizations etc,,,

but i understand what you are saying GEON but i also think maybe theres more than what books tells apparently.. we should try to match some of the hard science knowledge with this claims to try understand whats going on.. when i got back to Brazil and into the physics university was for this reason.. meyer talked the language of science and it seemed the most reasonable way to learn it.. and perhaps understand something more.

if patents never exists maybe we would have time machines by now =D

--- End quote ---

I completely agree with your assessment of st Clair.  He's more than a little 'out there'.  So I have to discount what he presents.  But I don't know that we DON'T have time machines already.  I was recently watching a chem trail jet, and it suddenly jumped quite a ways forwards, leaving a big gap in the exhaust stream.  Just teleportation, or maybe something more?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version