# Ionizationx: a clean environment is a human right!

## Stanley Meyer => Stanley Meyer => Scalar waves => Topic started by: Steve on April 24, 2009, 21:42:55 pm

Title: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 24, 2009, 21:42:55 pm
Hi,

I want to start a study here on SCALAR waves. It seems that it might have connections with the Stan Meyer setup.
Here is what i found sofar:

scalar energy is created, when you cancel out 2 same magnetic polarities.
such as forcing the negative poles of 2 magnets together.
or have 2 wires with the same polarity conflict, like this:

<------ +
+ ------>

people say lots of things about scalar energy.
including that it cannot be detected by normal electronics. but can be felt by the nervous system.
vibrations have been said to GREATLY increase the feeling of the scalar field.
such as attaching a small 9 volt motor to a scalar coil.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 24, 2009, 21:54:43 pm
In Simple terms, scalar waves are formed when two magnetic fields collide head-on or intersect at 90 degrees in such a way as to cancel each other out.

One simple method of generating scalar pulses is a ‘zip strip’, a length of 2 conductor wire with the wires connected at one end. They form a loop antenna. If a pulsed electrical current is put through this antenna, it will generate small scalar effects from the magnetic field cancellation. At the center of the length of 2 conductor speaker wire is where the fields cancel each other out, and where the scalar effects are manifest.

Modern mobius coils with helical cable generate scalar waves more efficiently because the loop described above is twisted into a tightly spiraled cable. If the degree of the twist in the cable is close to 45 degrees, then the whole length of the loop antenna is folded back over itself at about 90 degrees. When a pulsed current is put through this cable, it will create a magnetic field around the wires forming the winding. Then the magnetic fields around the wires will intersect at 90 degrees and cancel out. This generates scalar effects along the whole length of the windings instead of only a small ‘hot spot’ on the coil. It also modulates the scalar emissions produced with the signal used to drive the coil.

You can form a Mobius Cable by taking a few tens of feet of insulated wire, folding it in half lengthwise once or twice, and looping the end without the leads over a suitable projection. Twist the cable with an electric drill until the spiral angle is close to 45 degrees. You can now form any number of different 3-dimensional winding patterns for coils from this cable, and all will demonstrate some degree of scalar effects. This allows for much greater simplicity of construction than the early models made from single strands of wire. It also allows for much more powerful coils in terms of scalar output, since virtually all of the wire in the coil is put to work canceling magnetic fields to produce scalar emissions.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 24, 2009, 22:12:41 pm
more:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Non-experimental proof of Meyl's Tesla scalar theory

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Non-experimental proof of Meyl's Tesla scalar theory
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:10:39 -0700
Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:09:58 -0700
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <-pzwDB.A.bwE.G3ND--at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Original poster: "harvey norris by way of Terry Fritz <teslalist-at-qwest-dot-net>" <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com>

--- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
> Original poster: "Wall Richard Wayne by way of Terry

> So, while I consider Meyl's experiment flawed and
> his conclusions regarding
> Tesla scalar longitudinal waves unsupported by his
> experiment, nonetheless,
> longitudinal scalar waves are not disproven.   I'm
> sure there will be other
> future experiments.  We must be diligent in
> assessing them.
>
> RWW
This longitudinal issue to me seems to directly
analogous to a third degree of polarization. An
inductor as a recieving loop in rf can recieve signals
in two distinct categories, either as loops
encompassing magnetic flux change, or as loops facing
a surface area electric field change, in which case
its magnetic flux change is then minimized. Thus the
signal is polarized in three dimensions, instead of
two, and we can put the loops at any angle, and still
obtain energy, but seemingly "more" of it for
longitudinal reception. As an example of this, one can
set up a bipolar twin series resonance model using
huge 60 henry coils, two of them in parallel as
"inversely phased" series resonances as shown at Marx
Tank
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/MARX/DSC00079.JPG

One can further tune such a circuit for higher voltage
between opposite potentials, by placing the inversely
phased series resonances in the mutual inductance of
magnetic unison  of fields. The gives each coil a
higher Q factor, since the individual coils themselves
aquire an increase in inductive reactance, prior to
being tuned for this change in reactance. A coil of
specified winding direction, can produce either a
North or South pole for its instantaneous appearance
given the polarity input. Whether a coil produces this
north or south pole also depends on how it is phased
in the series resonance. If we take two identically
wound induction coils, place their bases together so
that their winding directions appear opposite to each
other, then the base of one coil will be producing a
South the moment the other inversely phased
resonance's base is producing a North, and a check of
the inductive reactance readings will also show this
fact for the winding alone case, whereby then equal
capacitive reactances are given to match those found
in mutual induction in magnetic agreement.
An arc gap can be set up to short these bipolar
resonant voltage rises. Such a 60 hz bipolar series
resonance is shown at
Binary Resonant System with ordinary quenched arc gap
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRMA/Dsc00341.jpg

Coils placed in the vicinity of this arc gap coil
system will record high frequency spikes, at the coils
own natural resonant frequency. Multiturn coils can
have a marked decrease of this natural resonant
frequency. Bifilar zig zag spirals appear to give an
exponential increase in internal capacity, where in
this example for a coil, the windings estimated to be
600 ft, by the 20 by 30 zig zag windings, produce
resonant frequencies in the 30,000 hz range, about a
13 fold reduction in its quarterwavelength values.
This coil is placed near a coil pole so that the
coil's magnetic flux change can occur  across inside
the coils inner diameter, thus creating "conventional"
EMF through magnetic flux change.

Bifilar spiral coil/ conventional reception for rf
ringdown/ 1x probe/ .2 volt/div;10 us/div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00354.jpg

Looks like 3 1/2 cycles in 100 us, or 35,000 hz

Now what my understanding of longitudinal EMF is
supposed to be is when the electron movement is not
made from magnetic line crossings at right angles,or
"pulse" that instead moves electrons in the same
direction as the flux "movement", being in and out of
the coil poles, so now for longitudinal EMF, we can
orient the inductor instead at that angle, where then
it recieves the least possible amount of magnetic flux
change

Bifilar spiral coil/ longitudinal reception for rf
ringdown/ 1 x probe/ .2 volt/div: 10 us /div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00355.jpg

Now we see a larger amplitude signal, but more
remarkably a change of frequency to 2.8 cycles/100 us
=
28,000 hz.
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00355.jpg

So we can form the idea that loops encompassing
"electric field change" can emit longitudinal EMF. So
a new form of "direct" longitudinal EM might be formed
by attaching a dielectric pathway between the high
voltage potentials, and then having an electric field
plate attached to one of the potentials. Loops facing
these field plates have their electric impulses
considerably magnified if those loops also contain
SrFe ceramic magnets in contact with the electrified
plate. Every changing electric field in space,
generates a magnetic field 90 degrees out of phase
with the electric in time, but ALSO at right angles to
the electric field. The conventional loop assembly to
recieve conventional emf will be with the loops
perpendicular to that surface area, not lateral to the
surface area. Thus the lateral coils represent a
longitudinal receptor and conveyer of the emf to a
neon polar capacity as a load.

Metal plate/ Glass of water/ needle to water surface/
magnet windings under bottom metal plate
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRMA/Dzl1165.jpg

These windings can be "shorted as dual loops" and
still deliver the current and voltage to the neon,
which itself can be scoped out for its Longitudinal
EM;
Longitudinal EM from Magnet windings/ .1volt/10us/div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRMA/Dsc00385.jpg

Comparison scopings of Variac/NST neon tube scopings
show NO longitudinal EM signals like this. Again the
wire loops are parallel to the imagined  magnetic
lines that might form around a current carrying tube
such as this. About .4 volts is recieved on the ring
bifilar antennae; coming from the persons finger, who
is the end capacity for the circuit. A different
inductor will record a much higher voltage, according
to the higher resonant frequency of the inductor... No
shock can be felt from the Neon buffered end of the
circuit on initial application, but the patient can
shock people easily.

Finger broadcasting .4 volts/~30,000 hz ringdowns
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRMA/Dsc00384.jpg

Heres some comparisons of just the magnetic coil
systems flux change differences on a more conventional
11 mh multiturn coil, with a resonant freq near
175,000 hz. This is a 500 ft spool of 14 gauge wire;
the differences of frequency are much smaller;

BRS Scoping of Conventional EM Rf Spike on 11 mh coil:
10x probe -at- 20volts/div; 1us/div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00348.jpg
BRS Scoping of Longitudinal EM Rf spike on 11 mh coil:
10x probe -at- 50 volts/div; 1us/div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00349.jpg
11 mh coil/ 3 ft, 45 degrees from pole/ tilt for
conventional reception of flux/ 5 volts/div/10x probe/
1us/div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00360.jpg

11 mh coil/ 3 ft, 45 degrees from pole/ tilt for
longitudinal reception of flux/ 5 volts/div/ 10 x
probe/ 1 us /div
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/BRS/Dsc00361.jpg

Sincerely HDN

=====
Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/

__

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prev by Date: Re: Non-experimental proof of Meyl's Tesla scalar theory
Next by Date: Re: Electronic Ignition drivers for TCs/ which type is best?
Prev by thread: Re: Non-experimental proof of Meyl's Tesla scalar theory
Next by thread: Re: Non-experimental proof of Meyl's Tesla scalar theory
Index(es):
Date
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 25, 2009, 00:17:49 am
Quote
scalar energy is created, when you cancel out 2 same magnetic polarities.
such as forcing the negative poles of 2 magnets together.
or have 2 wires with the same polarity conflict, like this:

<------ +
+ ------>

when i say for every action one trade takes place what i mean is for instance you have 2 tanks 1 is negavite and and the other is positve they are both 500 that gives them a difference of 1000.. if you were to open the valve for one second resonance exchange should have the same mirror potentials when you close it.. so for instance you started off with 500 opened and closed the valve resonant results could be somthing like +480 and -480.. if they are able to exhchange like that it is the difference in turbulence and a pure high speed vortex cyclone of exchange but end result will give you zero in both tanks.. since they began with exact mirror image..

<------ +proton                                          <------ -  electrons
reflecting                                                 reflecting
positive  + ------>                                    negative   - ------>

Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 25, 2009, 11:51:33 am
some of that stuff is over my head, this may seem a step back, with the similarities between Meyer's and gray, and Grey studied tesla and possibly Meyer's , not sure if he did or not, how ever  it might
worth a shot to go through some of Tesla's patents and experiment a little, it could be close to the same tech with different applications. what do you think?
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 25, 2009, 21:33:12 pm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13584991/meyl-scalar-waves-first-tesla-physics-textbook-for-engineers-2003

starting @ page 360 , there is some very interresting info on Meyers .

Opinions from the great Meyl , very nice see that me and him agree .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 25, 2009, 23:47:04 pm
its not really over your head at all.. you just gotta understand that a atom is energy because its displacements in motion.. when they say matter is majority empty space it is tru.. im betting protons are like earth.. they are usualy neutral but can also reflect. a positive charge (light)    so if the positive plate is shooting light across the cell  but befor it can make it to the negative side it is hitting all the protons and repeling them.. at the same relative time the negative plate is pulling on the proton mass.. and the vice versa is happening with the negative electrons.. they are being drawn to the light while negative is pushing them away...  the positive plate plays 2 jobs at one time of pushing protons and pulling electrons while the negative has 2 jobs at the same relative time.. 4 forces happenig to the water in relative time.. the frequency is just gatting ground to create a duty cylcle for the dead short...  that would restrict amps? but also alow the voltage to dwell and step charge?
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 00:33:55 am
its not really over your head at all.. you just gotta understand that a atom is energy because its displacements in motion.. when they say matter is majority empty space it is tru.. im betting protons are like earth.. they are usualy neutral but can also reflect. a positive charge (light)    so if the positive plate is shooting light across the cell  but befor it can make it to the negative side it is hitting all the protons and repeling them.. at the same relative time the negative plate is pulling on the proton mass.. and the vice versa is happening with the negative electrons.. they are being drawn to the light while negative is pushing them away...  the positive plate plays 2 jobs at one time of pushing protons and pulling electrons while the negative has 2 jobs at the same relative time.. 4 forces happenig to the water in relative time.. the frequency is just gatting ground to create a duty cylcle for the dead short...  that would restrict amps? but also alow the voltage to dwell and step charge?

It seems like Hdemartin had the step charging going on with the "opposing bifilar" connection .

This didnt translate to prodcution tho , as said by Meyl also . But what was that resonance that Hdemartin hit ?

Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 01:06:24 am
this is how i see the resonance imagine earth as a proton and the moon is a orbital electron..  we will say its orbiting clockwise..   imaging turning on the sun when it is at its closest point to the sun and turning it off when the moon reaches a orbit 180 out from then the light started.. then it is off for a 50 percent duty.. that allows the moon to have no force conflict during its return to the begining on point.. whchi once it reaches it will pulse on again.. so i see that as resonance on a atomic level..  when that happens i think light manifest and the gyro speed of the moon speeds up  to where it is capable of escaping the protons gravitational pull.. and reach higher orbits.. all in all creating higher expanded energy states.. when ignited they create thermal explosive energy in our demension by imploding.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 02:12:48 am
this is how i see the resonance imagine earth as a proton and the moon is a orbital electron..  we will say its orbiting clockwise..   imaging turning on the sun when it is at its closest point to the sun and turning it off when the moon reaches a orbit 180 out from then the light started.. then it is off for a 50 percent duty.. that allows the moon to have no force conflict during its return to the begining on point.. whchi once it reaches it will pulse on again.. so i see that as resonance on a atomic level..  when that happens i think light manifest and the gyro speed of the moon speeds up  to where it is capable of escaping the protons gravitational pull.. and reach higher orbits.. all in all creating higher expanded energy states.. when ignited they create thermal explosive energy in our demension by imploding.

Does your idea include the connection as per 10-3b ?

Yes I also tought of this , everything is locked in an orbit , like planets ...
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 10:14:35 am
yes.. as you can see in 10-3b the variable amplitude is 491xxx49n   that signal is the one being made between isolated primary grou8nd and  and the primary varable analog positve pulse
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 11:29:07 am
Maybe also relevant to you study, Steve:
http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_726.shtml
Also google leedskalnin perpetual motion holder, it is described here, his original paper:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/242432/Ed-Leedskalnin-Magnetic-Current-Illustrated

could his magnetic current be the long sought after magnetic monopole particle??

don't forget http://www.hyiq.org/ great info over there.

A simple experiment, possibly showing neutrino avalanche by scalarwaves at resonance (?), all were removed from youtube (6 videos, 30 MB total):
http://rapidshare.com/files/226287909/Pure_voltage_no_amperage_videos_of_ZeroPoint.rar.html
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 18:11:04 pm
Very interresting video ...

wiwhs he explained more about his setup , it seems like he connected negative to positive somwhow ... Wish I knew more about his setup .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 18:38:14 pm
So what is he doing with that primary ?

Hooking both negative and positive of his primary ??

Everybody must analyse this video ... What is he pulsing ,with what ? ... I'm confused , and how is he hooking up that primary .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 18:42:11 pm
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 18:46:26 pm
Yeah I was amazed when I saw it long time ago.
If I remember correctly, the simplest circuit consists only of a microwave transformer and an adp printer adapter,
only the secondary is used on which the adp is connected. A diode across the adp was necessary to prevent blowing up the adapter.
The sparking wires are 1 from the adp and 1 from the transformer.

Resonance, when the spark is most intense, is achieved by adjusting the characteristics of the circuit instead of a pwm:
by playing around with the connector to find the hotspot.

draw me a drawing of how his primary was connected , draw me as most as you can .

What does he mean when he say "connect negative and positive together" ... and it creates neutrinos ? ...

Oh... and , how the hell are those diodes working ??

So theoretically a unipolar direction could be possible ?
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 19:00:00 pm
this is 100% the way to go . I've seen enough similiar info and rumours and shadows of clues ... I finally start to see why everyboy might have been fooled .

I feel we are on a good solid path , I dont believe any amateurs have consciously been on this path .

There is something more to the Meyers tech , Its obvious by now , if you read meyl this is exactly what he says in his book . The functionning is never as it is in reality , its all for show , they used similarities and presented this in this way .

Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 19:54:54 pm
It was something like this, maybe exactly like this:

even better
feature=channel_page

so, only primary was used, instead of secondary alone.
the article I posted here applies to this
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 20:17:49 pm
Do Not Get the wrong ideal about the perpetual magnet holder. The unit Traps electromagnetic energy In its core when an iron is placed ontop. When power is removed the, "Core" remains magnetized. You would think that because the core remained magnetized that there would be current flowing threw the coils. This is not true based on the knowledge i have got.

Based on my learnings, it is the E core thats amazing, it can loop magnetics. My first thought was to put a amp meter between the coils after you removed power, i later learned the amp meter would have read 0 which is why i never constructed this unit. I was under the impresion that each coil was exchaning a resonant current, i was wrong.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 20:17:59 pm
Yeah I was amazed when I saw it long time ago.
If I remember correctly, the simplest circuit consists only of a microwave transformer and an adp printer adapter,
only the secondary is used on which the adp is connected. A diode across the adp was necessary to prevent blowing up the adapter.
The sparking wires are 1 from the adp and 1 from the transformer.

Resonance, when the spark is most intense, is achieved by adjusting the characteristics of the circuit instead of a pwm:
by playing around with the connector to find the hotspot.

draw me a drawing of how his primary was connected , draw me as most as you can .

What does he mean when he say "connect negative and positive together" ... and it creates neutrinos ? ...

Oh... and , how the hell are those diodes working ??

So theoretically a unipolar direction could be possible ?

I need a drawing for the cause of OU , you saw the videos ...

Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 21:14:41 pm
Do Not Get the wrong ideal about the perpetual magnet holder. The unit Traps electromagnetic energy In its core when an iron is placed ontop. When power is removed the, "Core" remains magnetized. You would think that because the core remained magnetized that there would be current flowing threw the coils. This is not true based on the knowledge i have got.

Based on my learnings, it is the E core thats amazing, it can loop magnetics. My first thought was to put a amp meter between the coils after you removed power, i later learned the amp meter would have read 0 which is why i never constructed this unit. I was under the impresion that each coil was exchaning a resonant current, i was wrong.
http://keelynet.com/energy/emery.htm
Ampere meter shows 6 amps continuously.

I think it works like a normal 1:1 transformer:
The load on the secondary being the primary.
As per lenz law, when secondary is loaded, primary needs to deliver more power to secondary as magnetic energy.
At the same time, secondary feeds the primary the required power as current, so the electrical current remains circulating. Like a feed forward loop.

@dankie
ok wait I make a schematic drawing of the first vid.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 21:52:02 pm
something like this
555 pulser is schematically drawn.

too bad he doesnt show input power usage, perhaps the same story applies:
voltage pulses separating neutrinos into positrons and electrons in the cap.

Btw, it looks exactly like meyer's vic, without the bridge rectifier and 1 core instead of 2 separate.
Maybe it is important only that the 2 chokes share a single core.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 26, 2009, 23:56:31 pm
nonono , what was that thing with the primary ... What did he say again ... Specified someting about that primary .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 00:00:31 am
Here are the video's.

The person here is telling us that he uses only volts and charges a capacitor for MINUTES.
If you would calculate the time times the milli amps he is using, then you still use amps.....
At least, that are my 2 cents.

We would need , lets say, more then 120 of those circuits to get a 2hz amp blasts, when we are able to switch the wfc between the charging capacitors.....

br
Steve
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 00:48:04 am
Do Not Get the wrong ideal about the perpetual magnet holder. The unit Traps electromagnetic energy In its core when an iron is placed ontop. When power is removed the, "Core" remains magnetized. You would think that because the core remained magnetized that there would be current flowing threw the coils. This is not true based on the knowledge i have got.

Based on my learnings, it is the E core thats amazing, it can loop magnetics. My first thought was to put a amp meter between the coils after you removed power, i later learned the amp meter would have read 0 which is why i never constructed this unit. I was under the impresion that each coil was exchaning a resonant current, i was wrong.
http://keelynet.com/energy/emery.htm
Ampere meter shows 6 amps continuously.

I think it works like a normal 1:1 transformer:
The load on the secondary being the primary.
As per lenz law, when secondary is loaded, primary needs to deliver more power to secondary as magnetic energy.
At the same time, secondary feeds the primary the required power as current, so the electrical current remains circulating. Like a feed forward loop.

@dankie
ok wait I make a schematic drawing of the first vid.

That's an old photo, i've seen it already. There isn't any wires going to the amp meter, its like "They guy thinks if you set the meter ontop the magentics will give reading."

go to Hiyaq and download the video, "This time watch it all the way threw."

You can unhook the coils, and still, "Still the magnetic field "Remains" ."
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 01:49:14 am
something like this
555 pulser is schematically drawn.

too bad he doesnt show input power usage, perhaps the same story applies:
voltage pulses separating neutrinos into positrons and electrons in the cap.

Btw, it looks exactly like meyer's vic, without the bridge rectifier and 1 core instead of 2 separate.
Maybe it is important only that the 2 chokes share a single core.

So I see that the transformer is conncted to 1 wire of coil A and to 1 wire of coil B , load is connected to other wires of A and B .

I have zoomed in and it seems to me like the coil is 1:1 from what I can see , seems like same wire size and same width/thickness

This is what I can see .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 03:23:32 am
Quote
So what is he doing with that primary ?

Hooking both negative and positive of his primary ??

Everybody must analyse this video ... What is he pulsing ,with what ? ... I'm confused , and how is he hooking up that primary .

dankie what do you think the positve is connecting to in figure 10-3...  49axxx49n  is a signal being created in primary winding.. that signal itself will not transfer itself by induction i dont think.. the signal in the cell is being created by its interaction with primary winding.. the primary is getting a analog pulse on the positive side of the vic while there is a transistor gating the frequency (cycles) on the negative gound side... the analog positve signal also has a gate occuring matching the negative sides..  together they form the ramp positve pulse and the frequency gate.. the ramp pulse us one solid pulse that can ramp up to 12 volts max...  while the ramping pulse is steady the frequency keeps isolating ground from the transformer.. while the analog doesnt gate off until the peak of its pulse.. the positive choke is either before or after the negative frequency gate.. i think the choke hooked to the primary will superimpose onto primary during frequency gate off time when gate is open i think the choke is gating current into the water. at about .001 amps... since the stainless helps to restrict amp flow as well as the water.. so i think he managed to make the cell like a transistor.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 04:02:51 am
Quote
So what is he doing with that primary ?

Hooking both negative and positive of his primary ??

Everybody must analyse this video ... What is he pulsing ,with what ? ... I'm confused , and how is he hooking up that primary .

dankie what do you think the positve is connecting to in figure 10-3...  49axxx49n  is a signal being created in primary winding.. that signal itself will not transfer itself by induction i dont think.. the signal in the cell is being created by its interaction with primary winding.. the primary is getting a analog pulse on the positive side of the vic while there is a transistor gating the frequency (cycles) on the negative gound side... the analog positve signal also has a gate occuring matching the negative sides..  together they form the ramp positve pulse and the frequency gate.. the ramp pulse us one solid pulse that can ramp up to 12 volts max...  while the ramping pulse is steady the frequency keeps isolating ground from the transformer.. while the analog doesnt gate off until the peak of its pulse.. the positive choke is either before or after the negative frequency gate.. i think the choke hooked to the primary will superimpose onto primary during frequency gate off time when gate is open i think the choke is gating current into the water. at about .001 amps... since the stainless helps to restrict amp flow as well as the water.. so i think he managed to make the cell like a transistor.

Make a diagram of what you mean .

Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 12:37:51 pm
im seeing somthin like this..
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 27, 2009, 19:42:23 pm
I`m sorry outlaw but that doesnt make any sense to me .

You need to communicate your ideas better .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 28, 2009, 00:06:37 am
the chokes are going to maintain there voltage threw inductance but during off time the negative side and positve side primary become isolated.. during on time every time it gates on on the negative side it is allowing current flow in the primary and in the chokes.. the chokes are resistive to amp flow since curent has to cross the water and the primary lags by 90 degress by gating chokes on and off to ground it is allowing voltage from chokes to supierimpose across primary during gate off ...  the primary and choke is being controlled by the same gate that is isolating them...  can you explain signal 49axxx49n from your perspective? what makes that signal.. everytime i read it im comprehending a variable voltage amplitude being applied to  one side of primary in analog form while the other side has a gate and a duty cycle matching the analog creating  the freqency occuring during analog pulse.. so the combination of them in that formation across the primary he defines as 49axxx49n.. that signal has no afilation with copper secondary and on every example  of bifilar choke it shows the positive choke being connected to 49axxx49n and ground.. if someone could please give me there perspective on that signal that contradicts what i see please share?
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 28, 2009, 14:16:17 pm
So I see that the transformer is conncted to 1 wire of coil A and to 1 wire of coil B , load is connected to other wires of A and B .

I have zoomed in and it seems to me like the coil is 1:1 from what I can see , seems like same wire size and same width/thickness

This is what I can see .
Exactly, the small coil has 2 coils wound 1:1 on a toroidal core; load being the cap.
It seems to be exactly what Meyer has.

If someone has the components, try this simple setup:
a 555 timer or any other variable timer, a mosfet/transistor to pulse power through to the mot, a mot (microwave transformer) and two separate (instead of a single core) audio chokes (have seen 10H), and of course a water cell.
Can't get any simpler.

"Do it yourself  >:("
I agree, but I can't.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 28, 2009, 23:20:48 pm
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 29, 2009, 11:30:15 am
cool vid
I don't believe in the inward wave, doesn't make sense, it is just a convenience. Where is it supposed to be coming from?
With nuclear fusion, matter is converted to energy by overlapping the matter waves:
the overlapping points add up in magnitude, unstable state is reached, and the summed waves ripple outward to infinity as traveling waves.
The overlapped points now have the same equal magnitude being shared, like a covalent bonding.
This should occur during the transition.
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 29, 2009, 11:50:59 am
(http://www.hyiq.org/Library/Images/SQM.jpg)
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 29, 2009, 16:38:18 pm
I also have been interesting in these so called Scalar waves that no one can prove.

So the most common explanation is that scalar waves are 2 waves same freq but 180 degrees out of phase.

If this is true, then it is very easy to make, by default any transformer generates this signal when generating a sinewave. (resonance).

The RF transmiter also generates this same signal, but one of waves is grounded and since the power is low, the grounded wave is faded out.

I think Tesla discovered Scalar waves because he was using so much power to driver his Tesla Coil (RF transmitter) that the wave going to ground was so strong that earth it self became an antenna.

Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 29, 2009, 19:04:35 pm
I also have been interesting in these so called Scalar waves that no one can prove.

So the most common explanation is that scalar waves are 2 waves same freq but 180 degrees out of phase.

If this is true, then it is very easy to make, by default any transformer generates this signal when generating a sinewave. (resonance).

The RF transmiter also generates this same signal, but one of waves is grounded and since the power is low, the grounded wave is faded out.

I think Tesla discovered Scalar waves because he was using so much power to driver his Tesla Coil (RF transmitter) that the wave going to ground was so strong that earth it self became an antenna.

It would indeed be easy to create such a wave , But to have this anti vortex happening  in your cell , you would need to  connect your positive to the upper part of the inner tube , and connect your negative to the bottom of the outer tube .

We need this counter rotating effect happening kinda like the searl effect .
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on April 29, 2009, 21:54:51 pm
Quote
It would indeed be easy to create such a wave , But to have this anti vortex happening  in your cell , you would need to  connect your positive to the upper part of the inner tube , and connect your negative to the bottom of the outer tube .

We need this counter rotating effect happening kinda like the searl effect .

i dont know about that man..  you got to think three demensional. a wire is a line in out relative space and in quantum aspects.. so lets say you have a choke wire wound... it is technicaly i line that is wound in one direction so  try to pretend in that wire all the protons mass is aligning for universal pumping are dipoleing.. i would say at one end of the wire is the top of the hurricane and at the other end its the bottom of the hurricane.. really think hard on the 2 perspectives of a hurricane top and bottom from the top perspective it looks like its spinning clockwise while the bottom appears to be spinning counter clockwise vice versa depending on which side of the equator.... it all depends on perspective in a quantum space which way it appears to be spinning..
Title: Re: Scalar wave study
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 17, 2011, 01:58:22 am
I use a scalar device know as a Hexbeamer.It creates a scalar wave using an assembly of magnets that are forced together at their opposing face. The resultant wave of this assembly is then passed through a pressurized inert gas (Xe). The final wave has amazing healing properties, the strength of the beam can be increased using magnetic coil methods and ionization of the inert gas. Higher phase beams have huge untapped potential and manifest in a physical push. One such assembly is when the Hexbeamer is configured in a tetrahedron configuration.

Enough theory, this is a real assembly that works and is used for healing and creating scalar energy.

Who else can say they have an actual working scalar mechanism?

When everyone stops talking you can finally listen.