Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors

[Login to see usernames]

No offense Steve...but, I read nothing of any resonance, you said you needed a bigger tube because your circuit couldn't reach 300Khz. I see no successful replication at all. Maybe you have talked to others that have...but, I would like to see proof.
Here's the difference Steve, I try and decipher a rather mysterious patent...I use my reading comprehension coupled with my knowledge of physics and electrical effects to hypothesize how it's operating. We know voltage potential is suppose to do work...we know that there is suppose to be IONIZED GAS....we know that AMPS ARE INHIBITED...I know how electricity REALLY works...and the "Poynting Flow" or voltage phenomena is the driving force, and that it's energy manipulates electrons and anti-electrons (Or whatever the counter flow is)....so I put the equation together and see it working in my mind....I offer MY OPINION!

You on the other hand are trying to tell us all "As a matter of fact" that it's a myth and that Naudin failed and it was just amps leaking...you say

Of course we seen hv and capacitance and resonance

, yet when you show your replication you have no such thing. So, I ask you...why do you speak from authority, saying "it's a myth...it's amp leakage making bubbles"?...when clearly you are skipping the whole basis of my interpretation!

If you make a perfect capacitor (even a good yet slightly leaky one)...just charging it will only create minimal gas...once charged YOU MUST RE-ROUTE THE CHARGE...disconnected from load so you don't create an energy sink that would draw more amps on the primary wire (this is the gating time of Meyer's system)...the charge is on the plates...AND ACROSS THE WATER/DIELECTRIC...you should read up on HOW to make ionized gas if you think my mode of operation is a "The Myth of Meyer"

Radiant,

I promised you to show my NAudin tests. Later on, i tried other ideas.
What you suggest, is to use an EEC circuit to discharge the charge of the cap. Is that the trick accoording to your knowledge?
Please show us some of yr Naudin testsetup.

Steve

[Login to see usernames]

What you suggest, is to use an EEC circuit to discharge the charge of the cap. Is that the trick accoording to your knowledge?
Please show us some of yr Naudin testsetup.

sorry i know this was addressed to radiant but i would like to put my 2 cents in..

i dont see the capacitor taking on the charge you are thinking of.. the charge you speak of, "discharge" that would require current flow to happen...

it is a simple physical process  meaning the skin effect fields and potential in the plates are drumming on the water... no charge is going in or out the water through the plates... the charge build up in the cell is done by using the physical force to up the orbital spin of the electrons..  the drumming creates the scalor waves i beleive.. stan says the cell pumps itself.. well if there is any movement of water with NO moving parts i would say that is like antigravity of a fluid..

there are so many uses for this tech alot havent even came across yet.. like for instance this tech can be used to propulse underwater.. it can also be used to make a vehicle such as a figher jet be able to go from submarine (underwater) to flight..
if i can suggest anything to study in full other then water tech.. i would look into the electron particle generator...

stan said he would use the E.P.G. (electron particle gen) and the water fuel tech.. to power homes... he said it would be no bigger then a 4 foot tall hot water heater in design.. really listen to these next word because they are gold..

stan learned how to make a magnetic gas that would exist at room temp... gases of such do not exist at the moment in acedemia..  but i have noticed some speak of acknolegement such as i think radiant when we were talking about back emf and the bright spark when disonecting power source.. someone mentioned how the copper ions and what nots could bond which ambient air gases..

ok this magnetic gas is made from argon and metal.. stan built a sealed container that had electrodes in it with argon being fed into it.. using the vic to produce these magnetic gases.. so understand this vic and voltage is able to restructure atomicaly and makes the perodic table obsolete in  alot of ways when it comes to what can bond to what.

the secret to this is that when you put a magnetic gas in a closed loop tube.. that is being mirrored on the inside..  you can pump the gas with a primary wound on a ferrite that couples the glass tube.. (i think its glass, it hasnt been clears said what the material is.. but it is non conductive..  you can then wind secondarys right to the glass tube (no ferrite) this can produce power more effecient then todays conventional..

the ultimate secret.. is that stan figured out he could send light into the mirrored close looped core that has magnetic gas in it.. listen real carefully to the major point being made here..   when stan sends frequencyed coherent light into the tube, it doesnt create current!!!! (pumping gases through the tube.. the light alone makes the volt fields jump in the magnetic gases.).

in conclusion.. stan would use the vic to power a hydrogen laser to power the closed loop core..

all this i just posted is a gift from me to you.. just as g.o.d. would want it to see a gain as a whole. (no greed)
stan would have done the same except he knew in those days you couldnt just throw it out there.. since greed would take it away in a heart beat.. he has helped out in many ways and has stood up for the whole like no other.. well i cant say that.. tesla tried as well, so did victor schauberger.

viktor schauberger made a antigravity craft.. he made living water somthing we dont drink much these days since the water has turned bitter.. living water is charged water.. it could help heal in many ways.. i would say it is the REAL holy water..  he was screwed over and over again. then some americans went to him and offered him unlimited funds to develop stuff for the good.. for the people.. well guess where he was brought in the u.s.  TEXAS out in the middle of no where.. he was tricked into signing away all his work.. when he returned to i think austria he said they have taken EVERYTHING  from me they even own me.. he died like 3 days later.
ask your self who the ballers were in texas that did this to him? there were no names said but i could make a few guesses.

[Login to see usernames]

P.S. i would say the raising and lowering amplitude.. is causing manefistation in the cell... electons move toward the pos and protons move toward neg..    the discharge you are thinking of is not a discharge really your just pausing the pulse to let the water stableize then hitting it again upping its potential even further... your alowing it to fully take on one wave set, before hitting with another..

[Login to see usernames]

Stanley Meyer are just smiling in videos and pictures knowing that this time no one can take the idea from him..
Nobody took his ideas from him, for they couldn't understand what he did, but sadly his life was somehow taken from him.

feature=channel_page

He used volt for splitting water... Potential energy.... But we cant restrict the amps and at the same time have energy to use?... or can we?  for example if i am welding some steel parts together and connect the ground cable for my MIG welding apparatus to a wooden table with the parts i am welding on... no ground...but that dosent mean i can weld for free for ever does it?... NO i cant... no amp! and no HEAT... Hello i said NO AMP = NO HEAT

Stanleys WFC was COLD and he claimes close to NO AMP.... HE DID NOT USE AMPS (or current)

What did he do?.. WHAT DID HE DO?..  hmm the opposite of electrolysis......

Maybe the answer will come if we wish on a star :  

[Login to see usernames]

you ever wounder why stan says you need more heneries then capacitance?..  answer anyone?

[Login to see usernames]

you ever wounder why stan says you need more heneries then capacitance?..  answer anyone?

Dude , go put ur ideas to work  .

[Login to see usernames]

you ever wounder why stan says you need more heneries then capacitance?..  answer anyone?

Sure, basics.

The higher the inductance and the lower the capacitance, the narrower the bandwidth.

Steve

[Login to see usernames]

Dude , go put ur ideas to work

dude. . you need to stop trying to regulate peoples thought and when they should be posting and not posting..

Sure, basics.

The higher the inductance and the lower the capacitance, the narrower the bandwidth.

Steve

what if i said i saw it another way... i see  the more winds over the capacitance means the charge will be more magnetically attracted to the core for capacitance rather then the water to exchange and balance out...