Author Topic: Stan's Resonant Frequency  (Read 36446 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #72 on: January 06, 2011, 21:32:10 pm »
Maybe reducing the turns on the primary of the input transformer and or the secondary too...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #73 on: January 07, 2011, 05:15:36 am »
If you are loosing resonance as voltage goes up maybe your paramaters are changing (ie resistance increases/decreases) this would change the required frequency to hit resonance, posibly change the rate of production also.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
    • Global Kast : Water Fuel Cell Research
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #74 on: January 07, 2011, 06:18:19 am »
Yea I'm sure this is why Stan included the PLL circuit into his setup for cuz as the voltage increases, so does the hho production and this changes the dielectric constant between the plates/tubes thus changing the resonant frequency.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #75 on: January 07, 2011, 08:55:13 am »
Yes ok the rate of production would be grater, however i think you are not getting more than 10v because the impedance of the input transformer, as you are pulsing at a rate of khz while the transformer works at 60hz...


Thats why i said that maybe if you reduce the primary turns and the secondary you will get less impedance so will allow a greater energy to be transmitted to the chokes and water...


Is about impedance matching. If you use a purer water would raise the impedance of  the resonance so you would get more volts for the same power consumption.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4463
    • water structure and science
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #76 on: January 07, 2011, 13:27:39 pm »
Crazy en Sebos: both of you are right here...
Good discussion, btw... :)

Steve

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4463
    • water structure and science
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #77 on: January 07, 2011, 14:59:18 pm »
Tony,

Maybe you can place a transformer after the Variac. Those have different values then the variac it self.
Still you can control the voltage on the output of the transformer with the variac........


Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 363
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #78 on: January 07, 2011, 16:27:35 pm »
Tony,your use of a microwave transformer for your choke,is no good.Stan used a EC52 core and wrapped it with 18 gauge wire.There was 56 turns for each choke wire,bifiller wound would work out to 14 turns per layer per wire,four layers total.The inductance was 760uH each.Each layer was seperated with a thin cardboard.Make one and try that,you should be able to get the voltage up better than you are now.
Don

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 460
    • Global Kast : Water Fuel Cell Research
Re: Stan's Resonant Frequency
« Reply #79 on: January 07, 2011, 17:00:08 pm »
Yea I have a coil wrapped to those specs but I the current usage was always 1.5A-3A depending on the spacing between plates. So this is why I decided to try a bigger choke setup to see if I could minimize current and boost voltage to the cell and thats what this did.