Author Topic: stevie1001 tubecell  (Read 26641 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4547
    • water structure and science
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #48 on: February 03, 2008, 17:28:51 pm »
Thanks Keith, Wouter,
I am a happy person after this big step!

I ran a test today with destilled water....
Man, that was a dissapointment
That water is soo clean, almost no current would flow. We always need some currentflow!
With tapwater on strait DC the WFC pulls almost 20 amps
With destilled water its no more then 2.5 amps. Bad production too.
Ok, it stayd clean in my wfc... :-\

I dont wanna make you crazy out there, but i havent seen this setup anywhere on any forum... ;)
I must take some time to let this kick in before I publish this schematic
Oh, and you need earplugs. The coil is making a lot of noice.. ;D ;D ;D


Br
Steve
« Last Edit: February 03, 2008, 18:34:02 pm by stevie1001 »

hydro

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #49 on: February 03, 2008, 20:11:18 pm »
hurry up master stevie, i cant wait!

keithturtle

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #50 on: February 04, 2008, 06:13:33 am »
I'm at odds with hydrocars on this one, bro- tal=ke all the time ye need, and document yer failures [or minimal succeses] so's you can articulate them to us, so we won't need to repeat yer mistakes.

Sounds kinda coarse on the surface, but think about it- how many folks have done the exact same thing, gotten the exact same results, and are sittin' there with little to show fer their time, just anutha thang that don't work.

If we use this methology, (and be patient in the process, hydro) we will go forward.   Patience.

But then again, I'm old.

Mebbe too old.

Turtle

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 51
    • WaterfuelForAll
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #51 on: February 04, 2008, 08:29:57 am »

I ran a test today with destilled water....
Man, that was a dissapointment
That water is soo clean, almost no current would flow. We always need some currentflow!
With tapwater on strait DC the WFC pulls almost 20 amps
With destilled water its no more then 2.5 amps. Bad production too.
Ok, it stayd clean in my wfc... :-\
......
Oh, and you need earplugs. The coil is making a lot of noice.. ;D ;D ;D
Steve

I'm happy to use tap water and I have already bought some earplugs!  ;)
Thanks for sharing and take your time.....

Wouter

hydro

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #52 on: February 04, 2008, 14:21:29 pm »
Thanks Turtle, i just follow the turtle tracks lol, im not far behind you...

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4547
    • water structure and science
good day bad day
« Reply #53 on: February 04, 2008, 21:56:07 pm »
 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(


Sorry dudes! No new invention from my part. After some testing I discoverd a mistake in my setup.
I can cry my eyes out.....



I quit. I am not worth living this live....


brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
steve

kumaran

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #54 on: February 05, 2008, 02:58:38 am »
Relax buddy. Never loose your interest. It happens many many times to me. Short exitement due to wrong measurement. At the end when we find out our mistakes, the pain is tremendous and we will feel ourself really stupid.

The most important thing is that you admit the mistake and announce to public. I'm sure lots of people were looking forward to your results. No problem. Put the experiment a side and go out for a walk. Relax your mind and come back after a day or two to continue.

hydro

  • Guest
Re: stevie1001 attemp to create the Stanley Meyer WFC
« Reply #55 on: February 05, 2008, 03:34:15 am »
well, if you really want to know my opinion, i think id rather hear your mistakes rather than what someone thinks might work, at least your trying and not talking about how it could work, i highly admire that!