Author Topic: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........  (Read 16653 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
  • Build it. Power it. Use it.
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #40 on: May 04, 2018, 21:47:44 pm »
OK, I'll try using something which is higher than 13.4 V, rather than lower.

The static on the plates is what polarizes the molecules.  Producing this static takes some amount of current.  If the current going to the cell exceeds this amount, the molecules will start moving, which is not what we want.


After the molecules are polarized, the second stage is to jerk the electrons repeatedly, to move them further and further from their molecule, until they are pulled free and the molecule breaks apart.  Apparently, the applied pulses take care of both stages - charging the plates and jerking on the electrons.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #41 on: May 05, 2018, 00:22:09 am »
is it not like charging 1 plate and removing charge from the other one?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
  • Build it. Power it. Use it.
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #42 on: May 05, 2018, 04:26:59 am »
is it not like charging 1 plate and removing charge from the other one?

That's how it seems to me.  And this does require current.  But we don't want current going THROUGH the cell; that would result in normal electrolysis.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
  • Build it. Power it. Use it.

What your talking about. ( It does not matter if the water has electrolyte in it either, at resonance the capacitor that is hooked up to the cell will maintain its charge across the cell!. ) 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235171659_Pulsed_DC_and_Anode_Depolarization_in_Water_Electrolysis_for_Hydrogen_Generation

I didn't think I had a capacitor across the cell, but after thinking about what you said, I finally recognized that the relay's tuning cap is, in fact across the cell when the relay is off, due to the way the buzzer is wired up.  When I pulled the cap, I lost all the jitter and also the residual voltage.  All that was coming from the cap, not the cell.  Thanks for helping me sort it out.

And the meter wire picking up the signal proximately was a case of inductive coupling, not an electroradiant effect.  The inductive spikes are not "radiant spikes".

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #44 on: May 05, 2018, 11:25:46 am »
My 2 cents for part of the proces...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #45 on: May 05, 2018, 11:30:27 am »
Hardkrome, is your theory that you present again and again, by use of resonance a hv pulse, till the pulse dies?
Is it that?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2018, 08:19:34 am »
This is not theory. Its a DC resonant charging circuit. However, there are about a half dozen other things that are hidden. So, I do not have to be concerned about the gold diggers and companies trolling this thread for new ideas they can capitalize on.







Offline Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: 6watts and 8 liters HHO per minute...........
« Reply #47 on: May 07, 2018, 14:34:50 pm »
not sure if that is still the case.... ;)
I see just some lone crusaders hangen in... ;)

Ok. What is phase 3? How does that look like?
I think we can learn from Puharich s patents.
The Electron extraction trick.....
Its to remove to charged wall of electrons, see picture.
When removed, back to phase 1?