Author Topic: oz injector goes public  (Read 18215 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 457
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #40 on: August 05, 2009, 21:52:37 pm »
Great numbers if they are legit , are they legit , are your extra sure ?
this.


also congrats! nice!
also with kwh's you mean Joule it can produce in an hour right?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #41 on: August 06, 2009, 02:30:36 am »
Hi Danki
                     look they may be a bit UNDERRATED,  I have used an engineering figs, the only ones that they will accept, until I can get some better data, hope fully the smaller unit will do this, now I know that I can make a smaller one, I was not sure before, it is all new stuff. I had a design, and stuck with it and built it. now I was only putting through 600cc per min (10cc per sec), but with the losses the best would have only been 8.3cc and I went as low as 6.6cc.  The btu value was converted to kj/sec, this is the same as kW. I use a special table used for gas turbines, it can give you all the gas mixes any way you like, and turn it into btu.
Now if the water has gone into a higher state then the temp of the flame will be over 2,800deg C the core plasma temp is over 5,000deg C closer to 10,000deg C and that is very conservative. That is why you see the 'red sparks' this is molten mild steel.
I hope that helps,  just think if I was at an industrial factory, and got it up to full power, it would be around 700litres a second coming out not 50cc a second.
aussepom

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #42 on: August 08, 2009, 15:44:17 pm »
Hi Guys
                     who of you is near Alexandria, Louisiana, there is a chance I may be coming there, well may be another place not sure yet.
 let you know more later.
aussepom

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #43 on: August 16, 2009, 15:59:08 pm »
Hi guys the latest one I played with in on the tube the pipe injector MKII

aussepom

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4462
    • water structure and science
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #44 on: August 16, 2009, 19:25:06 pm »
Thats looks like a lot of power, Aussepom!

Can you make some kind of tube with a Cork that you can blow away?
I am so curious about the power of that injector. ;)


Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #45 on: August 18, 2009, 16:20:39 pm »
    Hi Steve and to you all
  I have learnt so much over the last few weeks testing out both styles of the 'Injectors' we should really call them, as I have done to some parties, 'energy conversion units' if some one now asks what the unit is or does this is what I have been telling them,  so the 'Oz Injector' would then be a 'brand name'.
I have been repairing the main 'Oz Injector', and upgrading the 'pipe injector', since it blew a hole in the side. We have now a MKIII pipe injector, soon this will be upgraded again and will have similar workings to the main unit.
What this 'pipe injector is for, if I can get it into a stable running mode, is so I can run calorific tests, we have the set up now to do this.
How ever the main 'Oz Injector' may have a different output, and may completely burn though the whole thing if it was to run as it should.
What I will be also doing is finding out what would be the minimum power supply required, that I would need for the 'pipe injector'. This is not the correct supply, this is why it is an 'intermittent' in some of it's operation. It may look to you a continuous run, I do not mean where I edited it, this is a positive going square wave, or 'intermittent DC', 'chopped DC' depending how you look at it, it also a PWM supply.  I all ready have some idea what I need, and then I will have to tap into some rich supply of funds. That is now a possibility, if I can get some information that can be shown to the 'norm engineers', 'how can you get out more than you put in', they a crying at the moment, but they already know that water has a large energy that could be released, many will not admit to it. Water in another form has already sent us to the moon and is still sending up the space shuttle, 'Oh but that is different' is there cry.
So stuff them all lets keep thinking 'outside the box'.
So after the weekend, the MKIII pipe injector may be tested.
aussepom     

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #46 on: August 19, 2009, 03:20:20 am »
i decided to go for a stroll outside the box for a little while.. just got back...

my goal was to write an essay explaining my idea of how can you get out more then you put in..

to understand energy you must understand two divine motions/ or actions condensing (to compress) and expansion ( to expand)  one must also understand time and how a process of expansion and compression can be speed up or slowed down by acting external forces or mass in its local environment of space. 

there is allways a 2 way (bidirectional trade occurring while this expansion and contracting is in action.. for atoms such as hydrogen and oxygen  to create thermal explosive energy there is a implosion of energy occurring simultaneously the electron or electrons are imploding in search of closer unity with imbalanced protons giving the release of photon radiant energy..

 the more resistance there is to the recombination of electrons to create balance. the slower they rejoin and the lower the frequency output.... in our relative space we understand that lower frequency of output are the more powerful ones in our relative dimension for broadcasting power.. compared to the higher frequency's if I'm not mistaken stated by Tesla....

to slow down the covalent lock up of hydrogen and oxygen  can be done by adding non combustables to the fuel gas.. by allowing non combustables to be introduced in the fuel gas the hydrogens  will link up to them.. the more recirculated non combustables are available to link to the hydrogens of  the fuel gas the more retarded the flame will be due to resistance during ignition.. by providing non combustables to the mix is like introducing a resistor in a circuit..

the potential is still there but its path of hydrogen to rejoin oxygen during combustion just became harder since the non combustable resistively retards the timing for the rejoining during ignition.  this outputs a lower frequency which is beneficial as thermal energy in our dimension..

understanding this we can say we have slowed down time in the process of hydrogen and oxygen atoms recombining  and balancing. it was delayed due to the battle of the non combustables and oxygens for hydrogens during igniting.. the force that is driving this fight and delayed covalent link up is voltage(potential charge). 

now lets jump to the atomic dimension..  if we know that voltage is what drives the reaction  could it be possible to introduce your own voltage fields and alter the electrons motions.. maybe override the amplitude of potential present in the water molecule?.. is it possible to create such a high present potential to displace the electrons?

now what if our present potential  was able to build up and maintain a balance polarity across water.. meaning both plates having the vice versa charge..with balance opposite potentials 180 out from each other, would that give you a advantage of working both sides of the forces in the fight?.. pushing the electron and pulling resulting with a unidirectional double force?

the most important question is can the actions of voltage react with relative spacetime.. like for instance the polarization process is nothing more then a device that can speed up relative time in a capacitance....  it has nothing to do with trying to understand how your getting more energy from something then you had to use to get it.. it has to do with the advantage of being able to speed up reactions with balanced potentials allowing water to create its own oscillation as it fights to hold equilibrium. ......          in order to time travel or to create a increase excited state of space there is no book saying it requires amps to do it.  so all in all one must look at it like time was sped up in relative space where the separation process takes place while it was retarded and slowed down in the combustion process.. other advantages in waters output in a combustion process is that it supplies its own oxygen to catalyze its reaction rather then being dependent on the scarace 20 something percent present in our earths atmosphere that we rely on to breath

hope this can help you with your explanations.. just a different perspective of trying to under stand why its possible.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2009, 06:24:44 am by outlawstc »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 363
Re: oz injector goes public
« Reply #47 on: August 20, 2009, 00:27:01 am »
where are your carbons coming from that you say will link up with the hydrogen?If your only burning the hydrogen and oxygen from water,there isn't any carbon.And I don't think you'll find any in the air being used either.Thats the whole beauty of burning water,NO CARBON OUTPUT!!!.