Author Topic: Impedance Matching  (Read 27230 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #40 on: April 30, 2009, 19:55:26 pm »
So a single period of Pwf is the step charge from ground to peak voltage to ground again? Never seen it like this.
I considered T3 / gate as relaxation like Dankie pointed out, to discharge the cap unto itself.

Does (or should) energy from the battery get stored in or go to the wfc?
I believe not: no energy from the circuit should enter the wfc from the circuit.
But if voltage steps up, energy enters the wfc. From the water perhaps?

hmmmm

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #41 on: May 01, 2009, 08:38:37 am »
So a single period of Pwf is the step charge from ground to peak voltage to ground again? Never seen it like this.
I considered T3 / gate as relaxation like Dankie pointed out, to discharge the cap unto itself.

Does (or should) energy from the battery get stored in or go to the wfc?
I believe not: no energy from the circuit should enter the wfc from the circuit.
But if voltage steps up, energy enters the wfc. From the water perhaps?


alan by far this is the worst thing i have heard......the vic and cell draw 40 watts clearly stated in THE TECH BRIEF and will use up a battery as stated at the end of the tech brief.....it draws energy from the battery.....god damnit.....this forum is falling to kooks.

the energy doesn't magically come from water......the batteries energy is stored in the capacitor as the water takes on the energy....the energy itself begins to split the water apart....a dielectric breakdown.....IE gas production.....really i would love it if more people are hands on......this will stop all the wondering and magic energy vortex spiraling ether potential nonwave water life force drawing capacitor cell.

YES HALF OF THAT SHIT DOES EXIST......BUT.....MEYERS TECHNOLOGY IS K.I.S.S.......neutrinos???? next will be radiation spiraling of neutrinos which activate the water molecules magical bonds to alleviate there shackles of existence......


PLEASE ALAN IF YOU ARE TO MAKE SUCH POORLY BOLD STATEMENTS AS THE ABOVE STATE YOUR EVIDENCE....SHOW ME WHERE IN THE PATENT IT SAYS:

"Does (or should) energy from the battery get stored in or go to the wfc?
I believe not: no energy from the circuit should enter the wfc from the circuit."

PLEASE MAKE ME SMILE.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 457
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #42 on: May 01, 2009, 12:13:02 pm »
Ideally current should be 0ma?
well yeah the concept of infinity is only a mathematical one and not working in the real world. there's always a little bit of current left if there is voltage.
theoretically even with open clamps there is some little current, but we can only measure it to 10^6A so we see it as nothing.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #43 on: May 01, 2009, 12:22:29 pm »
The open clamp current is or should be equal to the current when the wfc is connected, there, that is what I meant :)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%A9venin_theorem

If the open clamp current is close to zero - no matter what the properties of the cell are, no more than this current will flow to the cell.
This exact current is limited by the VIC.
Or am I making a huge mistake here?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #44 on: May 01, 2009, 14:53:10 pm »
Kinesis , why dont you brg us some coherent test results of something . Alot of confusion and incoherence and shorted coils is what you achieved .

And I am not appreciating your moronic tone ... Neutrinos duhhhh Meyers says K.I.S.S ...








Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #45 on: May 02, 2009, 17:07:11 pm »
lol
I think you get me wrong: my suggestion was that none of the 40 watts reaches the WFC to charge it (amp inhibitor), it only gets dissipated in the VIC, creating 'lightning' seen by the WFC, where "voltage takes over".

the techbrief states 40.000V @ 1ma, 40kv after the chokes, meaning 40W indeed goes 'into' the wfc.
Ideally current should be 0ma?

so, ideally, no current should flow into the wfc, right?
If so, ideally, no energy to the wfc.

Don't forget driving a car using only 40W is magic in itself.

alan i see where you are mistaken but 40 watts still does reach the vic as you have said.....40,000 volts at .001 amps is 40 watts as you've noticed......it works the same way powerlines do (they step up voltage to incredibly large amounts of KV and very low current so there is no heat loss when transferring to homes and buildings then right before entering hte building they re-step it down to 120 volts very very efficient compared to dc current and edisons model).....very little is dissipated......it is all converted magnetically.....just like a transformer would do in it's magnetic field and coil windings.....ENERGY IS ENERGY.....40 watts of ENERGY IS STILL going into the cell just at 99 percent potential and 1 percent kinetic.....now that 40,000 volts of potential energy DOES CHARGE THE CAPACITOR......the charge builds up in the water molecule itself until it reaches a high enough point where the water molecules charge is larger then the covalent bonding and the molecule breaks......then that gas would continue to hold a charge......the dialetric just changes mediums but always holds a charge.....so in fact since energy is energy be it potential or kinetic energy is still stored and thus charges the capacitor.....in the earliest of patents you had to dissipate the power via a resistor causing heat in the resistor at a certain power dissipation......but in the vic nothing is dissipated but rather far more efficient by the use of conversion and a bouncing of the energy.....the energy never leaves the system since it begins to collided amongst itself charging the water to higher and higher levels until the dialetric breakdown of water equals the energy input.....and since energy is never leaving the system there is no dissipation.....the only way the energy CAN leave the system is via the seperated oxygen and hydrogen molecules.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #46 on: May 02, 2009, 17:14:14 pm »
Kinesis , why dont you brg us some coherent test results of something . Alot of confusion and incoherence and shorted coils is what you achieved .

And I am not appreciating your moronic tone ... Neutrinos duhhhh Meyers says K.I.S.S ...

i'm sorry if my moronic tone offends you, but your lack of simple understandings and outrageous claims is far too obtrusive for someone with lack of elementary understandings.

when your done with physics 2, and chem 2, and have actually used electricity to split water then come talk with me.

coherent test results???

im constantly on the grind.....you are always on the internet doing god knows what......i am working on this atleast once a day for an hour or more HANDS ON...and reading things over and over for a better understanding each time atleast another hour a day.....then i come on here and post what has been happening and you want to tell me that the secret to meyers is f-cking neutrinos......quit jacking off and reading topics which do not apply to this system at this current point in developement.

READ MEYERS WORK IF YOU WANT TO SOLVE MEYERS.....everytiem you propose the "real" theory it is 180 degrees from meyers.

we are working on MEYERS.

everything i do IS COHERENT.

you are the fool who brings a baseball bat to a football game.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Impedance Matching
« Reply #47 on: May 02, 2009, 18:40:29 pm »
Its ok Kinesis , we dont have to listen to you anymore . We know you were wrong .

http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,1027.msg10259/topicseen.html#msg10259