# Ionizationx: a clean environment is a human right!

## General => General Discussion => Topic started by: geon on November 13, 2019, 01:35:20 am

Title: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on November 13, 2019, 01:35:20 am
Hey guys, I want to share with you my findings that in essence there is no electric field but only the magnetic field, I can explain it like this the electric force is actually a magnetomotive force so the fundamental field in EM is the magnetic field, I haven't published anything yet because I'm working out if there is an easy way to correlate this to gravity because it's very probable that all fields are one and since the magnetic field is the electric field then maybe this can explain it all but I don't know how to approach it yet, the other strange part is that a closed line integral for the work of the B field becomes a straight line integral meaning that the B field while commonly doesn't do work can actually do work, in essence creating a magnetic monopole but this can't be created by humans it's the symmetry of the proton that allows this,  the energy - mass conservation theorems are very useful and can't be broken so this post doesn't have to do with free energy just to be clear
Title: Re: Magnetic field
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 10, 2019, 10:09:38 am
it's polarization of matter waves
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on March 09, 2020, 20:33:37 pm
All fields are polarizations of vortex components of particles
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on March 14, 2020, 06:34:25 am
I use the magnetic flux lines as real lines and the lorrentz law F=q v x B to derive all of electromagnetism
the magnetic flux can be superluminal because it's not a physical quantity

this is how EM waves propagate for small accelerations, for larger accelerations it's a different equation

http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/empulse.html

what can you build with this technology? I have designed a motor which can surpass state of the art motors power density by orders of magnitude, others have designed a pump motor which use the superposition principle and are a one wire motor which uses it's own magnetic field but these guys wrongly assume it's the electric field which is the primary mover, motors in 1900 used my principle as well but are not used anymore , you can also build cloaking technology and most importantly nuclear fusion because you can create a centric field with magnetic fields all these can't be built using maxwell's equations although if put in a FEMM program which uses maxwell equation in the solver algorithm the results are the ones which agree with my principle
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on March 15, 2020, 09:22:02 am
Can you share a video of your motor tests?
That would be inspiring  :)
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on March 16, 2020, 10:38:03 am
Can you share a video of your motor tests?
That would be inspiring  :)

Hmm I should have said I only have computer simulations of it because I need a constant current power supply instead of constant voltage power supply , there are some power supplies which use voltage shaping to reduce torque ripple but for me to build a power supply for that kind of power is way too expensive, I'm not an EE I can get away with building simple circuits and programs let's say for lab equipment tools but not this , the IEGBTs alone cost close to 1000\$

Now on to the EM theory, I have proven that the lorrentz law gives the coulomb force for constant speed, the experimental force for acceleration and it follows the wave equations just like the equations of maxwell , so the most basic law in all EM is the F= q v x B equation

does the magnetic or electric flux moves with speed c since this is the radiating speed for EM waves?
not really

if an electron goes on a circle then the flux has angular speed larger than the speed of light how is this possible if it violates relativity?
relativity only applies for objects with energy density

but don't EM waves carry energy density?
not themselves

Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on March 18, 2020, 10:04:41 am
here is one of the pics showing motor simulation
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 09, 2020, 21:29:19 pm
Oh about the motor it's a  motor around 10000 Nm , YASA made a 700 Nm motor in the same dimensions and weight and has got a shit load of money in grants and investments, the downside of my motor design is A) needs a  custom controller B) there aren't big enough batteries to utilize such a powerful motor like in trains, trucks e.t.c. C) needs a parallel motor to cancel torque ripple D) I don't know how to make custom controllers F) there may be deviation from simulation to real application it's 99% efficiency

Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 09, 2020, 21:34:39 pm
:P
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 12, 2020, 01:12:40 am
Hey did you checked John Quincy st Clair patents? He claim that is possible to create space time curvature using a combination of field.. perhaps with your knowledge reading it could bring some insights.
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 14, 2020, 07:35:17 am
what knowledge mang, I don't even understand tensor calculus  , my knowledge is getting reversed now
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 14, 2020, 07:37:25 am
Hey did you checked John Quincy st Clair patents? He claim that is possible to create space time curvature using a combination of field.. perhaps with your knowledge reading it could bring some insights.

from what I remember it didn't make any sense to me, more like science fiction rather than actual data
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 14, 2020, 07:49:11 am
about the motor I told you it works by the back emf but I must put a sinusoidal current shape not sinusoidal voltage shape like all driver circuits give , this concept has been done for torque ripple reduction, they store a data map with the voltage waveform for every RPM and reduce torque ripple, the voltage waveform is really messed up nothing like sinusoidal waveform but that's how you use all back emf for work and not have opposite forces acting on a motor like all modern motors have.

I will release a paper sometime about this, I use a modified lorrentz law F=qv x B(stationary) + B(motional) x vq
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 19, 2020, 08:46:35 am
who wants to build a fusion reactor?
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 20, 2020, 14:28:57 pm
What do u mean?
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 20, 2020, 22:25:24 pm
who wants to build a fusion reactor?

I am one big ear!
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on August 22, 2020, 23:29:38 pm
Search for hooper's electrogravity research   , ofcourse he mistaken this force for gravity because this force cannot be shielded but the experiments he did on the motional electric field were true , this was cambridge 1940 little bit after relativity theory, what he measured was that when the magnetic flux moves it produces a lorrentz force, the lorrentz force is the relative speed of the magnetic flux to the charge so it's not only F = q v x B but F = q v x B + B v x q , by using this equation you can solve the faraday disk paradox properly, there are two magnetic flux forces for a charge on the disk . you can only get measurable voltage on the disk when you cancel the second term of the modified lorrentz law because that's when the force vectors (directions) are constant. The speed of charges in a conductor is very slow that's why the resulting motional electric field force is very low to be easily measurable but the speed of a free charge is higher so the force resulting from a spark will be higher.

http://www.rexresearch.com/hooper/horizon.html
Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on September 13, 2020, 23:00:31 pm
here is a scribble to understand this very basic "hidden" force , it translates to all electric phenomena and because the speed of electrons inside metal conductors is close to zero this force is tiny due to wires but it's big when talking about sparks because the speed of electrons is very large in sparks , it also coincide with the way sparks evolve, after some kilovolts sparks behave differently because of this force getting bigger than coulomb force so the total force changes signs , ofcourse you have to put relative speeds in, this is a relativity phenomena and the second term needs to account for a stationary observer on the stationary electron

https://imgur.com/a/js57EnW

Title: Re: Poor man's unified field theory
Post by: Login to see usernames on September 16, 2020, 01:40:35 am
This force is actually the electric field, just take the magnetic flux to be rotating in an electron and you get the coulomb force from the modified lorentz law. But how does the magnetic flux exceeds the speed of light when it's rotating? ( No a magnet doesn't rotate the magnetic flux because the dipoles which create the flux are set in place by neighboring dipoles ) It's because the magnetic flux isn't real, it's interference from the matter waves which make up the particles, you only need to use the superposition of two quantum states and expand the schroedingers equations to matter waves instead of probability waves, the probability is because of the energy content of the matter waves so there's is no conflict with current theory the probability current still exists as a function of energy. Any two quantum states can make up a particle, the  magnetic field manifests itself in the interference pattern because of relativity theory, the waves contract or expand according to relative velocity. if there was one particle in the universe no EM forces would exist. Gravity, magnetism , electricity are because of spatial deformations of the spacetime continuum .