Something keep sdrawing me back to this. Its rolling around and around and i came to this theory,
Stans didn't say anything cryptic. Infact he tells you simply things that are already known but explains them in a way that i think misleads everyone. His whole setup is a large HV tank circuit. His inductors are used to "pump" (for lack of a better word) the voltage up to the KV point of dielectric breakdown. Yes yes we covered this, then you have 2 overcharging plates that, at worst case, arc over and ignite your generated gas, WRONG!!! if the High Voltage is only obtainable in the circuit at "circuit resonance" (
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_6/2.html) then as the capacitance changes in the cell the frequency also has to change to match the point of resonance. Thus the applied voltage goes down, down, down and no over arcing. FANTASTIC ITS CRACKED!!! nope sorry, his true genius is his bottom variable inductor, i am
guessing this is adjusted or is used to adjust the resonance point (the inductance could be used as a signal?!? to adjust the frequency up and down??? to match resonance) If figured out this could explain alot and make replication easy and adjustable to your own aplications. His frequency of 66khz would of been for his set up, matching the inductance to the capacitance to push the applied voltage on the cell acting as a capacitor, as the capacitance changes you need to adjust the frequency to match the new capacitance. His quote about letting the water "recover" could simply mean allowing the water to push the gas out to "reset" the capacitence. I put this forward as my theory on Stans meaning to his invention and how he explains it. All I need is a way to measure capacitance of my test cell. Find the value of used inductors, do the equation and blamo back to blowing up desktop power supplies.
Note to everyone wanting to know about the work electric fields do, listen to his lecture he points out some already known facts.
1. electric field increase the speed of moving electrons with-in the field.
2. electric fields have some magnetic properties (like fields repulse, opposites attract, fields can travel down some connected materials etc etc)
Now disect what i have said and tell me why i am wrong please!!!