Ionizationx: a clean environment is a human right!

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: tektrical on December 26, 2019, 20:06:45 pm

Title: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 26, 2019, 20:06:45 pm
At one point in my life, when I was younger and still influenced by the rock and roll music which was prevalent in that era, I witnessed an unusual meteorological phenomenon: dark rain clouds were directly overhead, but the sky off to the side was clear and blue, with bright sunshine coming at me.  Remembering the song about seeing the rain on a sunshiny day, I looked straight up at the big drops of rain falling down through the sunshine.  And every now and then, I saw a drop suddenly jump straight out to the side a few inches, then resume falling downwards.  Every time this happened, the raindrop always moved in the same direction: towards the sun, which was southwest of my position.

I speculated that a charged drop of water was directly hitting a magnetic flux line, and the interaction threw the water drop to the side.  So I concluded that a flux line has an actual, discreet existence.

But, was light also part of the interaction, causing the charges to move towards the light source?
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 26, 2019, 22:13:28 pm
that can happen with radiation pressure from the sun although the surface area is very small for it to affect it that much in the earth's atmosphere and if it attracts towards the sun it can happen with evaporation of water from the sun and turbulent flow of the water vapor, I think the flux lines are more real than what other people believe, of course then flux lines can exceed the speed of light so it's true that they can't be real real but almost real , they are actually part of waves the phase velocity can exceed the speed of light so the flux lines are real in a sense, no the photon can't produce it's own flux line or interact with it
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 27, 2019, 02:57:29 am
Can a charge carrying mass impacting a flux line produce an off center rotation of the magnetic phase angle?  If so, would that suggest that light is not involved with the observed effect?
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 27, 2019, 07:49:53 am
Can a charge carrying mass impacting a flux line produce an off center rotation of the magnetic phase angle?  If so, would that suggest that light is not involved with the observed effect?

what do you mean, the magnetic phase is 90 or zero degrees to the electric phase, the phase is just a time convection it means something is delayed with respect to something else, an off axis phase angle would mean that the phases of E and B are not synchronized but that can't be true since one comes from the other , no in the case of the water drop it's most probably due to light from the sun, the magnetic field of the earth is very weak and you could observe such motion in vacuum exactly analogous to how a compass works, a charged water drop can point to one direction and interact with the field of the earth

for the flux lines put this is slow motion

youtu.be/V-M07N4a6-Y?t=362

these are condensed to the center because the coil is a circle
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 27, 2019, 10:35:44 am
Considering the strength of a magnetic interaction requires a relative perspective.  The strength of a field depends on the number of flux lines per unit area.  The field close to the earth consists of one flux line per roughly every two square cm.  What we're dealing with is a raindrop interacting with a single flux line, as it falls through the two cm area.  The strength, or stiffness, of this flux line may be related to its length, which is considerably greater than that of a single line produced by a 'stronger' toy magnet.  Magnetism is considered to be a force.  Since force equals mass times acceleration, it would appear that a flux line consists of a rotating tube of luminoferous ether.  (This is the 'chemical ether', a phase of matter distinguished from the 'super etheric flux' of the quantum foam Aether).   Since a flux line is rotating, it has a phase angle at any given point.
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 27, 2019, 15:13:49 pm
Considering the strength of a magnetic interaction requires a relative perspective.  The strength of a field depends on the number of flux lines per unit area.  The field close to the earth consists of one flux line per roughly every two square cm.  What we're dealing with is a raindrop interacting with a single flux line, as it falls through the two cm area.  The strength, or stiffness, of this flux line may be related to its length, which is considerably greater than that of a single line produced by a 'stronger' toy magnet.  Magnetism is considered to be a force.  Since force equals mass times acceleration, it would appear that a flux line consists of a rotating tube of luminoferous ether.  (This is the 'chemical ether', a phase of matter distinguished from the 'super etheric flux' of the quantum foam Aether).   Since a flux line is rotating, it has a phase angle at any given point.

if the aether rotates then it must have a center somewhere and the speed of it would increase with increasing distance from the center so the aether can't rotate and the aether is just spacetime which is relativistic
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 27, 2019, 20:44:16 pm
The states of matter are: solid, liquid, gas, plasma, atomic, sub atomic, ether, and super ether.  The super etheric state, referred to as Aether, is relativistic, deriving from fluctuations in the background stress of space time.  On the other hand, the etheric state isn't virtual.  The etheric flux is comprised of all elements, chemicals, and substances.  It has a paramagnetic nature and a dull red color.  This flux can curl, and extend.  A rotating flux tube has a rotational phase angle which varies with distance.  This is old school.

Some might consider an electron vortex beam as a source of magnetic flux.  Even so, the electron's angular momentum still has a varying phase angle.

For the sake of this discussion, we might also consider the effect of flux line vibration, caused by charge carrier impact, and the interaction between this vibration and the incoming light.
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 28, 2019, 21:30:20 pm
That just gave me an idea:  if we take a water cell, having some charged particle containing bubbles rising upwards with a longitudinal movement and subject them to some vibrating flux, perpendicular to the movement, will the presence of electrons traveling backwards in time (making them positrons) effect the outcome of the experiment?

(See following quote)
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 28, 2019, 21:33:01 pm
I think maybe the QM equations are not describing probability but matter waves my nickname is actually how this is called I didn't know what it meant when I used it though I just recently discovered it, the vortex not only describes B field but all 5 fields this is a unified field theory now the question is how does the internal clock of a particle changes and since the charges are either positive or negative there should be some synchronization between adjacent particles the photon is made from the same stuff as the electron and other  particles, the amount of information is pretty big it's very hard to correlate everything otherwise somebody would have already done it, also it means you need a 5D spacetime to do this an electron and positron is exactly the same particle but only has opposite charge , this doesn't even need synchronization since the polarization gradient allows the positive and negative charge to exist by taking the mean values of polarization, I told you search for podkletov's experiment reminds me the work of tesla this goes back to 1900 EM at least this is what led me where I am now, I have designed a coil less motor using a small part of this theory but the most important application would be nuclear fusion since you can create a central field, the magnetic cusp designs they use are very complex, from what I remember a reactor can be made the size of a room and not a city block as the current designs although this is all theory , in podkletov experiment he made cement to crack that's because of internal stress on the atoms if you make a vortex you can transfer it's angular momentum to an atom e.x. a random paper of this is https://www.academia.edu/896157/Transfer_of_Orbital_Angular_Momentum_from_an_Optical_Vortex_Beam_to_a_Nanoparticle
 if you destabilize the particle enough you can turn it into something else take thhttps://groups.yahoo.com/neo/getmydatae electron-positron annihilation and the electron-positron creation
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 28, 2019, 22:05:53 pm
The correct answer is if we substitute an incoming longitudinal beam of light for the movement of the bubbles, the bubbles will still move anyway, TOWARDS the light, based on the recently discovered Acoustic Tractor Beam.
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on December 29, 2019, 16:02:49 pm
I pretty much mentioned all the points I intended to discuss in this thread.  All but maybe one little thing.  So here's a final thought, before I move on to something else.

paraphrased quote by from geon:
Quote
I told YOU to watch this video.

A newly formed positron, for instance from the breakup of a gauge boson, is, by definition, traveling backwards in time.  The fact that a newly formed positron, traveling backwards in time, continues to exist into the future proves conclusively that directivity and sequenciality are two entirely different dimensions of time.  Not space-time.  Different dimensions of time itself.  Sometimes, fancy mathematical equations don't accurately describe the real world.
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 01, 2020, 23:56:13 pm
I pretty much mentioned all the points I intended to discuss in this thread.  All but maybe one little thing.  So here's a final thought, before I move on to something else.

paraphrased quote by from geon:
Quote
I told YOU to watch this video.

A newly formed positron, for instance from the breakup of a gauge boson, is, by definition, traveling backwards in time.  The fact that a newly formed positron, traveling backwards in time, continues to exist into the future proves conclusively that directivity and sequenciality are two entirely different dimensions of time.  Not space-time.  Different dimensions of time itself.  Sometimes, fancy mathematical equations don't accurately describe the real world.

the positron doesn't travel backwards in time , it is just a mirrored electron
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 02, 2020, 10:50:54 am
Aren't you the guy pulling tiny little 600 Watt batteries from the future to power your cooler?

If you mirror an electron, does that change the third dimension of time, which is it's density?

Why does quantum mechanics say that the universe doesn't care which way time flows, at the smallest scale?

Why are you blasting my thread, refusing to discuss anything relevant or on topic?

Why should everyone give YOU their attention, when someone else reports an observation?
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 02, 2020, 13:08:18 pm
Aren't you the guy pulling tiny little 600 Watt batteries from the future to power your cooler?

If you mirror an electron, does that change the third dimension of time, which is it's density?

Why does quantum mechanics say that the universe doesn't care which way time flows, at the smallest scale?

Why are you blasting my thread, refusing to discuss anything relevant or on topic?

Why should everyone give YOU their attention, when someone else reports an observation?
is this some kind of encrypted message?  :P
 ;D who cares why don't you prove time going backwards for a change?
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 02, 2020, 15:02:32 pm
I'm putting you on my 'don't feed the Troll' list.  I'm completely willing to let you have the last word, should you decide to post anything else to this thread.
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 02, 2020, 15:55:19 pm
how about you delete my quoted message since it does have real information in there which I knew beforehand were going to waste given the kind of forum this is but I just put it up here because I was of the same mindset as you before I knew what the f I was dealing with about 10 years ago
Title: Re: Moving Towards The Light
Post by: Login to see usernames on January 02, 2020, 18:48:37 pm
Your red letter quote is a response to your demand for proof of reverse time.