Author Topic: New idea  (Read 13059 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: New idea
« Reply #24 on: May 08, 2009, 22:24:07 pm »
Did demartin say that in his video or wrote it somewhere?
He just dumps power in the wfc, or else the lightbulb wouldn't be lit, don't you think?
Later on he connects the other side of the second choke: no light and some bubbles, now what would happen when voltage rises? Maybe this is it instead.

Quote
VIC Coil Assembly (580) of Figure (6-1) as to (690) of  Figure (7-8) in reference to
Schematic Circuit (620) of Figure (7-1) is constructed in such a way as to rotate and position
Inductor Coils (26 - 52 - 56 - 62) to be of the same electromagnetic polarity orientation (as seen by the coil, or as induced by the current through coil??), indicator
mark  (e)
(???) ...  thus, allowing Inductance Fields (FL1 - FL2 - FL3 - FL4) to be aiding one another
during the same sequence of pulse-time (T1) ... thereby, allowing Inductance Charging Effect (660)
of Figure (7-5) and Resonant Voltage Effect (670) of Figure (7-6) to interact with  the dielectric
properties of water (Re) to cause and inhibit electron flow (IF) since "electrons" magnetic 
field (547) of Figure (5-9) locks onto the electromagnetic fields of each energized choke coils
(FL1/FL2) during Voltage Excitation (Vo -Vn) which, now, brings on and allows "Electron
Bounce Phenomenon" (700) of Figure (7-9) to take place.

« Last Edit: May 08, 2009, 22:41:41 pm by Alan »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: New idea
« Reply #25 on: May 08, 2009, 22:36:57 pm »

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: New idea
« Reply #26 on: May 08, 2009, 23:53:04 pm »
I agree, more watts always give more bubbles, perhaps the countering fields setup less bubbles, but more efficiently.
I have yet to see a single circuit by Meyer with fields aiding, have you experimented with countering fields, Steve?

Well, i tried with 2 positives fields. Meaning plus 5 volts and plus 30V...

br
Steve

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: New idea
« Reply #27 on: May 09, 2009, 00:00:54 am »
fields aiding.
Is it interpreted correctly?

Yes. Looks good to me.

Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: New idea
« Reply #28 on: May 09, 2009, 00:12:03 am »
The Rabbit Hole goes very very deep .

Hdemartin was a smat guy thats 4 sure , where he is now I dunno ...

Guy seems to have totally dissapeared .

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: New idea
« Reply #29 on: May 09, 2009, 01:53:35 am »
There is also a good post on page 67 of that thread .

where are these ppl nobody knows , 2curious4wfc also isnt posting anymore .

Smart ppl who made progress and are not posting their findings ?

Perhaps ...

Obviously these ppl knew what they were talking about .

That connection isnt working well with the s/s wire from what I hear .

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: New idea
« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2009, 05:04:25 am »
Hello everyone....My name is Joshua Williams, most of you know me as ZeroPointUnlimited  ;)
I believe I have cracked the Theory/missing pieces of Meyer's system.

I will call it "Reverse Electrolysis" so we can all begin to understand it....this is an attempt to explain it.

Remember these points...
1.Voltage does the work
2. Resonance is crucial
3. According to witnesses the temp. stays at room temp or lower
4. The gasses are IONIZED!! and subsequently MAGNETIC
These are the 4 most important KEYS to remember when trying to unlock this mystery.

Let me also start by saying it's important to understand these terms

MOLECULE="A sufficiently stable, electrically neutral group of at least two atoms in a definite arrangement held together by very strong chemical bonds"
DIELECTRIC= An Insulating material having as close to balanced or neutral charge across the MOLECULE as possible making it NON CONDUCTIVE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dielectric
POLARIZATION=The phenomena of an opposite charge being created when a voltage is brought "NEAR" something...NOT TOUCHING with a Dielectric between
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/182690/electric-polarization
ION=A Molecule or Atom having an imbalance in charge (either more or less electrons then protons) Which results in either a net + or - over all charge. ex...Copper is stable (non conducting) in its natural form of Copper Oxide/Sulfide, but, has a surplus of -electrons as pure copper......It's important to realize that only Ions conduct current.
 


Now we must understand what work voltage can, and, in fact does. I have found that the work voltage does in all circuits is polarization. Think static electricity or lightning. If you bring a voltage potential (+ or -) near a piece of matter w/o touching it, it will polarize an opposite charge on the object's surface molecules near the voltage. This action is the primary cause of electricity. For example;  Lightning happens because there is a large -electron charge in the outer IONosphere, this charge is relayed across the insulating air gap (clouds etc) to polarize the ground positive. This Action orientates the airs molecules too, and, once the charge build up is high enough it breaks the air down and conducts the huge charge....et viola LIGHTNING!
SO USING THIS EXAMPLE VOLTAGE DOES WORK BY ALIGNING/POLARIZING MOLECULAR CHARGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


We must now understand WHY Resonance is crucial, and, resonance can be explained as simple as pushing someone in a swing. Lets say the pusher is an input current pulsing a transformer primary, the transformer is the swing, and the swinger is the output of the transformer secondary. When I push the event starts...the person swings out, then back in, and back out. This is called an oscillation, if I were to stop at one push it would continue, but, slowly die down, the same as a pulse in a transformer. If I push at the right time as the person is going back out, then they would go higher. If I were to to do it every time the output would reach it's highest level, and you can think back to ur childhood....it is the easiest (least effort) way to push someone.
SO RESONANCE IS TO ACHIEVE THE HIGHEST ENERGY LEVEL OUTPUT FOR THE LEAST INPUT ENERGY!!!! (correct timing)

Now I will apply this to Meyer's system and explain the significance of the last two points.

If you have done much research into Meyer's system you will have undoubtedly read/heard the term "Water Capacitor" and heard him say the phrase "Water as part of the dielectric"....and like wise you must know about the EEC or Electron Extraction Circuit.
It may be obvious to you by now, it may not...here it is.
The WFC applies a huge voltage potential across the water, the resonant pulse is the charging pulse, to bring the voltage across the WFC to maximum. The gating pulse disconnects the input, while turning on the EEC to bleed off the charge....BUT...TO BLEED IT OFF THE WATER!!!!!! IN A SEPARATE CIRCUIT!!
So you charge the water capacitor up, then REROUTE THE IMPLIED CHARGE OF THE WATER (ELECTRONS) THROUGH A CIRCUIT! This reroutes some of the water's electrons and releases gasses. But, most importantly, IONIC GASSES

 It's the only way the gasses could be ions like Meyer's text/images say....because if the water were allowed to touch the electrodes (electrolysis) they give up their charge and become neutral as they hit the opposite electrodes. This explains much, like how Naudin got bubbles all though he says an electrode is insulated. This is why Meyer's said the water was PART of the di-electric. One terminal (+) must be insulated, this allows water to charge negatively, you must then open a path to the positive through a separate circuit (EEC)...rerouting electrons from the water...w/o closing the input circuit, so energy cost is only the cost to pulse the coil...not flow current through the WFC!!!

I hope I explained it well enough....and if not please ask questions
« Last Edit: May 09, 2009, 05:29:50 am by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: New idea
« Reply #31 on: May 09, 2009, 05:37:37 am »
Welcome to ioniuzationx.com Joshua .

I'll go straight to the point . O and I didnt modify your post , for some reason it says I did ...

#1 , was that little choke in your video a 1:1 ration , how was it connected , how should the bifilar be connected ?  Should they even be a bifilar ??

#2 You are saying a coating is necessary ? I have Dynodon is telling me he saw nothing but maybe there was an invisilble layer of something ?

#3 You said something in one of your videos , that when you "connected the positive and negative of the primary" and this created neutrinos ? How was your primary connected and how was it getting pulsed ? Plz go deeper with this