Author Topic: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS  (Read 3004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« on: April 10, 2009, 02:11:44 am »
NEW DRAWING

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2009, 02:23:08 am »
So a bifilar is key (question mark)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2009, 02:32:18 am »
notice all the tanks are 500 gallons having equal capacitance for potentials.. if one were smaller it would loose pressure quicker if one were bigger it would maintain pressure longer therefore could never be in sync when discharging simotaniouslty into each other .. pretend the pipe between is the water gap in the cell..  its all about balance of displaced states..  the first one has a turbulent roll from pressure side toward the vacuum side.. the middle is a balanced potential on each side. which  i think will create a horizontal high speed cyclone instead of a bunch of turbulent rolls toward the point  closes to equilibrium.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2009, 02:39:23 am »
Quote
So a bifilar is key (question mark)

thats what im seeing.. they have to be of exact length and same resistance like the tanks (wire)  to match..  same length (capacitcane) gives the tability to build up equal oppositions in relative time from the puming source.. if one side has less winds and isnt balanced then it will gain pressure(volts) faster then the other side will.. get my drift..

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2009, 02:46:10 am »
Not really .

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2009, 02:55:31 am »
when it turbulently rolls  from high pressure to low pressure due to unbalenced opposing states.. it is like a wave comming toward the beach.. the force of the water toward the shore is much stronger then the force of the water trying to flow back into the ocean therefore the stronger side starts to tower the weak side and roll into it turbulently.. if you had 2 swells of equal size hit each other at the same speed what will happen? 

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2009, 03:12:37 am »
So what happens , somekind of collision , and that does what ...


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: TURBULENT AND NON TURBULENT DISPLACEMENTS
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2009, 03:33:59 am »
well two waves hitting each other of the same magbatude will make one big wave in the collision  and should mushroom both ways.. that would be in comparison to negative hitting negative.. stans two waves are vacuum and pressure in volts..  so there not really hitting and causing turbulence.. i think they make 1 long cyclone from tank to tank when balanced..  stephen meyers said he was facinated the way it made ribbons during production in one of his radio blogs.. he was talking about stans adjustable plate setup.