Author Topic: Info  (Read 29384 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Info
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2009, 22:58:19 pm »
yeah i just recently posted something under the vic photo discussion thread about stephen saying it and the link to his interview.......i can't remember where stan said xl >xc though.....but i remember it.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2009, 16:17:37 pm »
page 7-10
Quote
In terms of Component Reactance, Inductors (LIIL2) should always be larger than Capacitor
(ER) of Figure (7-2) in order to maximize amp restriction
I think he talks about the frequency at which Xl is max and Xc is min

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Info
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2009, 18:10:19 pm »
exactly but then recently stephen meyer mentioned impedance matching.......so we will see.......

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2009, 18:53:01 pm »
gonna look for the stephen interview

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_reflection
Impedance discontinuities cause attenuation, attenuation distortion, standing waves, and other effects because a portion of a transmitted signal will be reflected back to the transmitting device rather than continuing to the receiver, much like an echo.

but then again, meyer didn't talk about waves reflected/bounced back in the wfc itself.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2009, 12:09:02 pm »
« Last Edit: March 21, 2009, 14:46:47 pm by stevie1001 »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2009, 13:21:53 pm »
This one is more accessible

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Info
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2009, 17:37:20 pm »
but then again, meyer didn't talk about waves reflected/bounced back in the wfc itself.

you may be on to something here......remember the electron bounce phenomenon

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2009, 15:15:26 pm »
rubberbanding effect = stationary wave = scalar wave

The resultant ever increasing pulsating opposite electrical voltage fields (603/604a xxx
603/604n) of Figure (8-1) having superimposed thereon counter opposing Rippling Voltage-
Surfaces (64/B+a xxx 64/B-n) [Dynamic Electrica1 Charging Effect (612) of Figure (8-1B)], now,
set ups, causes, and applies ever increasing (rubberbanding effect) Pulsating Opposite Electrical
Stress (RU-RU' - ST-ST') across Water Gap (Cp) ... encouraging "Particle Oscillation" as a.
"Energy Generator"
 ;D ;D

(http://phoenix.phys.clemson.edu/labs/224/standwave/10.jpg)

what do ya think?
please comment
« Last Edit: March 22, 2009, 18:03:34 pm by Alan »