Author Topic: Info  (Read 29383 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #64 on: April 09, 2009, 16:57:57 pm »
"The Muon-process":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion

To create this effect, a stream of negative muons, most often created by decaying pions, is sent to a block that may be made up of all three hydrogen isotopes (protium, deuterium, and/or tritium), where the block is usually frozen, and the block may be at temperatures of about 3 Kelvin (?270 degrees Celsius) or so. As said previously, the muon may bump the electron from one of the hydrogen isotopes. The muon, 207 times more massive than the electron, effectively shields and reduces the electromagnetic resistance between two nuclei and draws them much closer into a covalent bond than an electron can. Because the nuclei are so close, the strong nuclear force is able to kick in and bind both nuclei together. They fuse, release the catalytic muon (most of the time), and part of the original mass of both nuclei is released as energetic particles, as with any other type of nuclear fusion (see nuclear fusion to understand how this energy is released). The release of the catalytic muon is critical to continue the reactions. The majority of the muons continue to bond with other hydrogen isotopes and continue fusing nuclei together. However, there is a major drawback with muon-catalyzed fusion: not all of the muons are recycled, and too many bond with other debris emitted following the fusion of the nuclei (such as alpha particles and helions), removing the muons from the catalytic process. This gradually and ultimately chokes off the reactions, as there are fewer and fewer muons with which the nuclei may bond. The highest success rate achieved in the lab has been on the order of about 100 reactions or so per muon.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Info
« Reply #65 on: April 09, 2009, 17:18:57 pm »
Stupid muon processes...


Fuck that modafukkin "scientific community" ...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #66 on: April 26, 2009, 13:27:50 pm »
Outlawstc will like this one:
Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe.
http://www.ctmu.org/
Interesting theories by Christopher Michael Langan.
He's got an IQ of 200+, so it could be close to the truth.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #67 on: May 06, 2009, 11:29:25 am »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_electricity

if you have access to a library, look up the references:
1) Kouropoulos, C. P., Classically Bound Electrons; EVs, Chemistry & Cold Electricity, 2005
3) Loeb, Leonard B. and Meek, John M., The Mechanism of the Electric Spark Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 1941
4) Shoulders, Ken and Shoulders, Steve, Charge Clusters in Action Bodega, CA, 1999

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #69 on: May 06, 2009, 17:21:21 pm »
compare:
Quote
now,
set ups, causes, and applies ever increasing (rubberbanding effect) Pulsating Opposite Electrical
Stress (RU-RU' - ST-ST') across Water Gap (Cp) ... encouraging "Particle Oscillation" as a.
"Energy Generator" by way of pulsating "Electrical Stress" as the combustible gas atom particles of
the water molecule undergo "Particle Deflection" farthest from the point of "State of Equilibrium"
and returning back to "Stable State of Equilibrium" during-pulse off-time (T2) for repeated
"Snapping Action" (Rubberbanding effect) in accordance with bi-polar Voltage Rippling Effect
(1010) of Figure (10-5), as so illustrated in (280) of Figure (3-35).
and
Quote
Exposing the hydrogen atoms to applied Static Voltage Stimulation (770) of Figure (8-1) causes
the Static Electrical Charging Effect (585) to set up "Voltage Tickling of State Space" which takes the
hydrogen atom (s) from "Quiescent State"(Qs) to "Active State"(As) and then back again to "Quiescent
State (Qs) once applied unipolar pulse-wave (583/602) goes through Voltage Pulsing Cycle (Vpwf) from
"Ground State"(Gs) to Voltage Peak potential (Vpp) (780) of Figure (8-2A) and then returns to "Ground
State" (Gs) for continued repetitive Voltage-Pulsing (583/602a xxx 583/602n) ... forming Pulse Wave
Frequency (Pwf), as so illustrated in (780) of Figure (8-2) as to (770) of Figure (8-1). 
and, most important
Quote
A Technique Called "Easer" 
Energy Priming Stage (500) of Figure (5-1) is, now, activated and performed when the hydrogen atom
(s) is exposed to applied Voltage-Sync Gate Pulse (V gp) by which Electrical Voltage Attraction Forces
(Electrical Stress) (RU-RU' - ST-ST') causes "Particle Oscillation" of the hydrogen atom (s) to emit
radiant energy (Ers) (919), as so illustrated in (980) of Figure (10-2) as to (500) of Figure (5-1). The
applied unipolar Positive Voltage Pulse (B+) (ST -ST') electrically attracts the negative charged atom
electron; while, simultaneously, applied unipolar Negative Voltage Pulse (B-) (RU-RU') electrically
attracts the positive charged Proton\,(3) that forms the nucleus of the hydrogen atom ... causing the
hydrogen atom to elongate under Atomic Electrical Stress (Aes)(?AA'-?ZZ') ... whereby,
atomicelectrica1 attraction force (4) that exists between the deflected orbital negative charged electron-
(1) and the pivotal positive charged Proton (3) is attenuated (?4a xxx ?4n-?5axxx. ?5n) ... which, in
turns, attenuates the spin-velocity of the "Gyroscopic Regulator" of the hydrogen nucleus to cause
Energy Aperture (7) to emit/transmit more or greater amount of Universal Energy (9) into, through, and
beyond the energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom for "Energy Propagation" (atoms being an "Energy
Generator" in our physical universe) by way of "Particle Oscillation" of the hydrogen atom (or any other
atom), as so illustrated in (570) of Figure (5-10) as to (550) of Figure (5-8).

to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent_lamp

Quote
"principles of operation"
The fundamental means for conversion of electrical energy into radiant energy in a fluorescent lamp relies on inelastic scattering of electrons. An incident electron collides with an atom in the gas. If the free electron has enough kinetic energy, it transfers energy to the atom's outer electron, causing that electron to temporarily jump up to a higher energy level. The collision is 'inelastic' because a loss of energy occurs.

This higher energy state is unstable, and the atom will emit an ultraviolet photon as the atom's electron reverts to a lower, more stable, energy level. Most of the photons that are released from the mercury atoms have wavelengths in the ultraviolet (UV) region of the spectrum predominantly at wavelengths of 253.7 nm and 185 nm.

"A technique called Easer", which is nothing more than a hydrogen lamp - also the demonstrations with these tubes on scalar potentials, function exactly the same as a regular gas lamp, except the for the mechanics of transfering the atom into a higher energy state (bold above):
electron collision vs voltage field mechanics.
 ;D

where does the energy come from?
I believe the attached pdf explains it:
forcing an atom to a high energy state without adding the needed energy
(sucking in energy from the vacuum because of the entropy / energy potential difference, like meyer said, universal energy being of higher potential) .

Quote
Energy Aperture (7) of Figure (5-8) exists in all atomic structures (individual atoms) and functions as a
one-way energy valve when the Incoming Energy Vortex transfers a given or discrete amount of
"Universal Energy" (having higher energy potential) into the Energy Spectrum of the Atom to
compensate for and maintain "Atomic Energy Equilibrium"

Now vortex makes sense, it is just natures way of energy transfer.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2009, 17:42:18 pm by Alan »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 121
Re: Info
« Reply #70 on: May 06, 2009, 18:10:09 pm »
Alan,
I hardly ever comment because like a few others here I know very little about this science but this is good stuff.  Even though it’s over my head it makes me want to learn more.
John

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Info
« Reply #71 on: May 06, 2009, 20:08:57 pm »
No No No , all this is wrong ...

Stan says voltage does work , thats the voltage across the plates that "breaks the dielectric bond" .

All this vortex stuff is nonsense , KISS ... The Neutrino stuff is also not happening , lets not get into this , KISS ...

*this is a parody*
« Last Edit: May 06, 2009, 20:57:43 pm by Dankie »