Author Topic: Info  (Read 29413 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #56 on: March 29, 2009, 13:03:38 pm »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Info
« Reply #57 on: March 29, 2009, 20:50:13 pm »
analogy of the harrp.  imagine that whole square grid of antennas are like hairs..  you know how your hair stands up cause of static.. that forms of capacitance of electrons happening.  its a skin effect... now if you know how to  create vacuum and pressure, which is nothing more then displace electrons in a atomic structure. you know how to fluxuate atomic vacuum state and pressure and you can build potential... electrons are like air..   and we know air is a volume of lighter  expanded elements.  remember that the air is 1 subject.. but it can be put in difference.. if it didnt then we wouldnt be here because there would be no action. so the area of harrp allow for a big area of electrons to build.. in the skin effect until the do a reversed lightning strike.. using the ionispphere as the attraction for the pull the mass electrons up into the atmosphere.. that is causing strong shifts of potentials in the atmosphere. and can create turbulance. off balance turbulance can create more heat because they are amps..  thats how they alter the weather with it.. and they can send different resonance.. like different tidal waves and effect things in different manners.. they say it can sweep the brain and cause stress.. depression and so on.. it can throw you into unatural bipolar moments.  like we are inductor chokes and there flipping our pole orientation..

as for the chem trails that they relate the harrp to. i think its just water.. they are flying in the neutral point of difference when it comes to electron and light transfers trading off. right at the area of  fluent trading off at the switching point of 2 different resistive characteristics volumes.  it will make water want to go into higher state.. so its expanding into vapor.. it is white because when oxy goes into a expanded state it reflects all light.. so they are white. just like clouds.. what you should worry about is that commercial flights running on carbon fuels. its what really messes up the balance.. you shouldnt introduce large amounts of carbon by ozone.. it sucks into in like a sponge then you have dark neutral matter holding more heat and distorting the light coming to earth.. it heats up causing global warming issues.  because its distorting light to earth then the light that gets in it distorts from getting out. creating heat where there shouldnt be and that throws atospheric pressures off. everything works in vice versa.. the vice versa' s  have vice versa's..
in a since newtons law for every action can cause an equal and opposite reaction it should have one more line at the end for variability so it should go like this... for every action there is a equal and opposite reaction but in some cases duality vice versa can occur. thats what makes life so unpredictable.


cheers
outlawstc

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #58 on: March 31, 2009, 12:21:34 pm »
Could it be that meyer's system is based on exciting the dirac sea with sharp voltage gradients like Bearden and Dirac said:
as a result neutrino's get separated -> electrons appear out of no where and recombine with the water -> the water gets separated.

I doubt it, but maybe it is already proven that electrons can be  created this way.

electrons = matter
pulsing dirac energy sea = 'creation' of matter.

Meyer was saying this all along.
Maybe he really did know the secrets of nature.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2009, 14:18:29 pm by Alan »

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4443
    • water structure and science
Re: Info
« Reply #59 on: March 31, 2009, 16:30:49 pm »
Could it be that meyer's system is based on exciting the dirac sea with sharp voltage gradients like Bearden and Dirac said:
as a result neutrino's get separated -> electrons appear out of no where and recombine with the water -> the water gets separated.

I doubt it, but maybe it is already proven that electrons can be  created this way.

electrons = matter
pulsing dirac energy sea = 'creation' of matter.

Meyer was saying this all along.
Maybe he really did know the secrets of nature.

Alan,
Can you give us a link on that subject?

br
Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Info
« Reply #60 on: March 31, 2009, 19:53:45 pm »
i think light and electrons are the same thing.. they are just spinning in opposite directions..  when passing each other.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Info
« Reply #61 on: March 31, 2009, 21:21:59 pm »
that doesn't make sense?

light is photons, has no mass, electrons have mass
electrons can absorb and spit out photons
electrons can spin in both directions, paired or unpaired
photons are sometimes a wave and sometimes a particle

they are definitely related, but surely distinct

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #62 on: March 31, 2009, 22:27:11 pm »
Could it be that meyer's system is based on exciting the dirac sea with sharp voltage gradients like Bearden and Dirac said:
as a result neutrino's get separated -> electrons appear out of no where and recombine with the water -> the water gets separated.

I doubt it, but maybe it is already proven that electrons can be  created this way.

electrons = matter
pulsing dirac energy sea = 'creation' of matter.

Meyer was saying this all along.
Maybe he really did know the secrets of nature.

Alan,
Can you give us a link on that subject?

br
Steve
sure, this link talks about it: (precursor engineering from Bearden)
dern_Physics" class="bbc_link" target="_blank">http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:Precursor_Engineering_And_The_Falsification_of_Mo dern_Physics

"I think if one had to point to a single place where science went profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the emasculation of Dirac’s equation." [D. L. Hotson, "Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy," Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.] Available at http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf
See also D. L. Hotson, "Dirac’s Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy", Part II, New Energy, Issue 44, 2002, pp. 1-24. Available at
http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart2.pdf .

http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0703/0703257.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0611/0611091.pdf

you can also google for dirac-maxwell field


awesome website:
http://www.hyiq.org/
« Last Edit: March 31, 2009, 23:23:15 pm by Alan »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Re: Info
« Reply #63 on: April 05, 2009, 13:31:08 pm »
Beyond the Visible Universe by Stoyan Sarg
http://books.google.nl/books?id=mFXlq05n_Q0C

some of dr stiffler's papers, not free anymore, but saved it to pdf:
http://rapidshare.com/files/217321883/e.zip.htm

Springer - Hydrogen Bonding - New Insights - 2006.pdf
http://rapidshare.com/files/217419538/Springer_-_Hydrogen_Bonding_-_New_Insights_-_2006.pdf.html

Doing physics with quaternions (he converted physics to quaternions)
http://world.std.com/~sweetser/quaternions/qindex/qindex.html
free book
http://www.theworld.com/~sweetser/quaternions/ps/book.pdf
too bad the maxwell equations are symmetrized like bearden objected to.

Excitation of dielectric barrier discharges by unipolar submicrosecond square pulses
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0022-3727/34/11/312
(hmm, article not for free  ::) )