Author Topic: Defining the word "opposite"  (Read 19379 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Defining the word "opposite"
« on: February 25, 2009, 18:46:46 pm »
Stan is always mentionning "opposite" ... "opposite this" ... opposite that ... As you know I believe this is the same force as two repulsive magnets north to north ... O voltage across the water gap @ some point AND a few normal but @ a different time  HV bursts across the gap . In what order I do not know , maybe the off time cause the coil 56 to collapse in reverse mode ... Or maybe  sequential order , alternating between high "non-voltage" and high voltage  with the gated signal . Cant say for sure .

In this thread I will simply lay out the information wich leads me to believe that this is not the typical sense of "opposite" , Stan really makes effort to always mention this word with the "         "   , as if it was something major , something wich IS NOT simply HV pulses wich "breaks down the water dielectric capacitor" ... But indeed some sort of water massager to "weaken" its link ...

I believe we are all taking the technique for granted , we have to really understand the water molecule , we must become Stan Meyers ...

Now I will ask you this question , what if we had 2 different signals , both exactly +20 000.000 and  -20,000.000 for a total of net zero across the cell , exactly lenght of wire to cell , what happens to the matter @ that specific location where the EMF meets and cancels out . Lets say this was a pulsed signal , and that sometimes there is just no EMF meeting at all , just normal +0 and - 0 ,  but then On time again +20,000 and -20,000 , we know there is no current flow in the circuit and no power and that it is viewed as pointless and illogical in normal electronics point of view  .But does this have an effect on the matter in that location where the EMF cancels out ? Some sort of "vacuum bubble" , some sort of "particle oscillation"  ??? Who knows ...

Here is all the info I have gathered throughout the year , info wich points in that direction . I know its extensive reading but plz read everything and judge for yourself what is the meaning of "opposite" .

There was recently an interresting article posted @ theorionproject web site , it is called precursor engineering and written by Tom Bearden , pdf is included here with the pics , it is a bit hidden .

http://www.theorionproject.org/en/01_20_09_mailing.html

http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,897.0.html (link to a thread I made recently regarding this subject )

« Last Edit: February 25, 2009, 19:13:48 pm by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2009, 00:33:57 am »
feature=dir

clues from the goverment ?? Or half-truths ?

A non-wave inexisting existing wave wich dissasociates molecules ??

« Last Edit: February 26, 2009, 01:08:34 am by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2009, 01:12:26 am »
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bearden/ferdelance/s18.htm

An artificial potential is deterministically patterned spacetime stress, made by opposing E-fields and/or B-fields so that they sum to vector zeros in a special pattern.

The resulting zero-summed envelope has no EM force field, to an external observer/detector.

However, the infolded E-field and B-field vector components still exist and act. They may dynamically vary, so long as their summation is always kept to zero.

The simplest variation is to vary all their magnitudes at once, by the same degree. In that case, each one comprises an "EM wave." However, the summation of this cluster or "locked group" of waves still exhibit a zero-E and zero-B field to any external observer/detector. In other-words, to an external observer, one now has a varying wave of pure spatiotemporal stress, but one which has a deterministic structure. This is a scalar EM wave, or electrogravitational wave. It is also an alternating current of specific scalar pattern.

Varying the stress of spacetime locally, curves it locally. This violates the conventional assumption of restricted general relativity that local spacetime is uncurved (is a Lorentz frame).

By use of scalar EM waves with deliberate substructures, one can engineer Bohm’s "hidden variables" so that quantum mechanics becomes deterministic rather than statistical. This is a drastic change to the common (Bohr) interpretation of quantum mechanics.

And Einstein’s intuition that God does not play dice with the universe turns out to be correct after all.

Since physicists haven’t seen where the real game was being played, it has all seemed bewilderingly statistical to them.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bearden/ferdelance/s23.htm

We now visualize the formation of waves of pure stress in the spacetime medium (in the vacuum). arThese we call scal EM waves, Tesla waves, electrogravitational waves, longitudinal EM waves, waves of pure potential, electrostatic/magnetostatic waves, and zero-vector EM waves. All these terms are synonymous. Each sheds its own particular light upon the nature of these waves or of their original discoverer, Nikola Tesla.

We use a gedankenexperiment, or thought experiment, in which we can be "perfect."

Thus we have two single-frequency EM sine waves whose E-field components are shown on the slide. The two waves are of the same frequency, traveling together in the same direction, and superposed 180 degrees out of phase with each other.

In this case, at any spatial point, the summation E and B fields are vector zeros.

However, if we plot the spatiotemporal (vacuum) stress induced by the wave, we see that it constitutes a sine wave, with compressive stress in one half cycle and tensile stress in the second half cycle.

Rigorously this defines a "longitudinal" EM wave -- or what Tesla called a "sound wave in the nonmaterial ether.’’

Also, rigorously it is a gravitational wave, for it is a wave of the curvature of spacetime (nonlinearity of vacuum) itself. That is, what is changing in the wave is the vacuum stress, or intensity of the virtual particle flux of vacuum. That is identical to changing the curvature of spacetime. In one half-cycle, spacetime is curved positively. In the second half-cycle, spacetime is curved negatively.

Since the increase or decrease of the intensity of virtual particle flux (vis-a-vis the ambient vacuum’s virtual flux intensity) represents electrical charge, then in one half-cycle negative charge is represented, and in the other half-cycle positive charge is represented. This directly explains the "positron-electron pair" representation of an electromagnetic photon -- the "photon" being one wavelength.

In one half-cycle, time moves slower. In the second half-cycle, time moves faster. Thus scalar waves can also be considered to be "tempic" waves (to use Wilbur Smith’s term), or oscillations of the rate of flow of time itself, about the ambient rate of time flow. Since these oscillations are variations in the curvature of spacetime, then they represent gravitational or force-generating waves, when coupled to a mass.

Variations in the rate of flow of time produce force, just as any other type of curvature in space time does

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2009, 01:40:06 am »
This is a science explanation from the movie "The Watchman"

I saw this on the main page and clicked on it just 4 fun , I was stunned ... coincidence ? I think not ...

from 1:00 to 2:05 .... This is the effect I want happening with my water , I think we all want this ...

feature=dir

clues from the goverment ?? Or half-truths ?

A non-wave inexisting existing wave wich dissasociates molecules ??

« Last Edit: February 26, 2009, 01:57:00 am by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2009, 19:33:46 pm »
HELLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2009, 19:41:14 pm »
yeah they do that in mercedes and lexus cars.....and in some headphones.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2009, 19:48:44 pm »
Yes, Interesting, except he says the wave cancels out, well, net effect yes, but what he is not talking about what we (you) are talking about, because it's not the net effect we are looking for, its the combined effect.

I've heard of this before, devices used to cancel out sound waves, they can put them up between a highway or industrial area and a residential area and they will cancel out the noise so people can live in peace.

Maybe that is something to look into?

 Donald

I dont understand what you mean , yes he is talking about what I am talking about , exactly what I am talking about  .

Yes the super powers of watchmen  were created by this out in phase wave , the ''non-wave'' .

I find it interesting because I believe this is  what Stan meant by ''particle oscillation''

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Defining the word "opposite"
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2009, 22:00:27 pm »
dankie in the watchmen youtube video they are saying that the waves out of phase cancel each other out equaling zero......when i try to make acapellas from songs and sintrumentals i just invert the wave form so it cancels out the music and leaves just the audio......if we were to do this
+20kv and -20kv would cancel each other out.........i see what your trying to go for but that video is not what you are understanding......in that video it EQUALS ZERO.....completely out of phase.......now let's setup a potential difference......THIS IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT......if we set up a potential difference of +20kv we will have an equal -20kv.......that is just how positive and negative charges work think about lighting!!!!!!

the negative particles are at one end and the positive particles are at the other......they create a potential difference which then creates lightning......THIS IS WHAT YOU MEAN.....think about the capacitor plates and their charges.....if you apply 20kv to one plate....the other plate doesn't just sit there like a duck......a negative charge gathers and forms on the other plate naturally to meet the charge of the positive......

DANKIE HAVE YOU TAKEN PHYSICS 2 YET?
they will show you this with rubbing plastic and rubber rods and touching metals balls......(all of that seems sexual)....but seriously.

http://thunder.msfc.nasa.gov/images/primer/thundercloud.gif