Author Topic: New theory.....the real one?  (Read 10742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
this is why. read three times if you have to.
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2009, 19:16:14 pm »
Electrons can move rather easily from one atom to another in some materials. In
other substances, it is difficult to get electrons to move. But in any case, it is far easier
to move electrons than it is to move protons. Electricity almost always results, in some
way, from the motion of electrons in a material.

Electrons are much lighter than protons or neutrons. In fact, compared to the nucleus
of an atom, the electrons weigh practically nothing.

Generally, the number of electrons in an atom is the same as the number of protons.
The negative charges therefore exactly cancel out the positive ones, and the atom is
electrically neutral. But under some conditions, there can be an excess or shortage of
electrons. High levels of radiant energy, extreme heat, or the presence of an electric field
(discussed later) can “knock” or “throw” electrons loose from atoms, upsetting the balance

Ions
If an atom has more or less electrons than neutrons, that atom acquires an electrical
charge. A shortage of electrons results in positive charge; an excess of electrons gives a
negative charge. The element’s identity remains the same, no matter how great the excess
or shortage of electrons. In the extreme case, all the electrons might be removed

Conductors
In some materials, electrons move easily from atom to atom. In others, the electrons
move with difficulty. And in some materials, it is almost impossible to get them to move.
An electrical conductor is a substance in which the electrons are mobile.

An insulating material is sometimes called a dielectric. This term arises from the
fact that it keeps electrical charges apart, preventing the flow of electrons that would
equalize a charge difference between two places. Excellent insulating materials can be
used to advantage in certain electrical components such as capacitors, where it is important
that electrons not flow.

An EMF (electromotive force) of one volt, across a resistance of one ohm, will cause a current of one ampere
to flow. This is a classic relationship in electricity, and is stated generally as Ohm’s Law.
If the EMF is doubled, the current is doubled. If the resistance is doubled, the current
is cut in half.

It is possible to have an EMF without having any current. This is the case just
before a lightning bolt occurs, and before you touch that radiator after walking on the
carpet. It is also true between the two wires of an electric lamp when the switch is
turned off. It is true of a dry cell when there is nothing connected to it. There is no current,
but a current is possible given a conductive path between the two points. Voltage,
or EMF, is sometimes called potential or potential difference for this reason

i dont want to here any debates.. read lean understand..

***************notes***************

charges in a wire are caused by excess or shortage of electrons for copper atoms.

conductors allow more fluid transfer of electrons..
t
he stainless steel will create resistance less fluid like transfer

emf transformers put out higher current as frequency increases..

double the resistance current drops by half

10-20khz is a low frequency so lower current being forced by emf transformer primary to secondary
turns then take over for upping volts.. even more volts and resistance/ impeadance is added by chokes to restrict the low amp voltage.

positve choke gets super saturated with positve copper ions.. the capacitance of the choke means more volume for more positive copper ions to be stored.. they in return want electrons so bad there trying to steel waters electons.. it will go for waters before it will go for the negative excitor plate since the waters are closer.. any that try to jump in the form of current is choked of by resistance of neg choke.
when tuning negative choke to waters resistance you are mainly lowering its potential of neg to prevent it from being strong enough to cross.

hope this helps all


outlawstc


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2009, 20:36:22 pm »

WayTogo you are confused ... Thats bad for gas production



Dankie are not confused, and have a huge gas production  ;D

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #18 on: February 22, 2009, 21:35:15 pm »
i hate false statements from people who dont read but instead guess all day putting there mind in a non realistic reality..  waytogo if you were to make it to page 201 water fuel cell memo 430 you would have read this......

"The Voltage Flexing Process to deflect the water molecule under both physical and electrical stress to emit thermal heat energy from the atom (s) of the water molecule under control state, is, now, to be presented by the utilization of the WFC Steam Resonator technology which
incorporates the use of the Voltage Intensifier (VIC) Switchover Circuit to cause "Particle Oscillation" as a "Energy Generator:"


outlawstc

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #19 on: February 22, 2009, 23:09:36 pm »
the switch over circuit only moves the entire H2O molecule back and forth over and over creating nothing but kinetic energy which does what boys and girls......heats up the water.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SPLIT WATER WITH STANLEYS SWITCH OVER CIRCUIT......the steam resonator was used to keep water from freezing in certain climates.....

READ THE F-ING TECH BRIEF.....way to go waytogo.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2009, 00:10:34 am »
Yeah yeah, you know it all dont you...

Why can Steve can light up a bulb with the cell after the power is disconnected?..

Last year i had three separate cells connected together in a spesial way...

You cant believe what i dicovered.. There was close to no amp!!! and all you care for is getting somebody down.

Steve got a big point here, and it is not impossibe and nobody are stupid for believe in this.

You guys really need to see things in a new way insted of reading cryptic patents and believe word for word.

You cant go a new way and invent new things when your mind is blocked.

All i say is work on this. I have. This is a hint.



Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2009, 00:55:14 am »
its not a hint its disimformative.. you ask why can steve light a bulb when off?  that would be because the positve inductor is still holding positive charge..
when you place a light bulb between positve choke and cell it is buring off the electrons. that are still crossing over the cell at a slow pace.. notice stans fuel cell drawing.. all his ground rods are conected.. the positives are seperate. that allowed him to change  how many cells that can be on. only for the positve...  they would be considered parelell not series.. since series requires current to pass charge from cell to cell using current... by only haveing control of the switching on and off of the positve what do you think will happen.. nothin special but a pulse dwell time aka frequency that our vic is already doing it self..

waytogo im not downing you at all. its just i knowlonger wounder how it works i can see it in my head.. its all about deflection of electrons. once one understand that charge in a wire is nothin more then the change of  the actual copper atoms charge ..
by delfection of electrons in our positve choke.  the vic is a low current electron extracion circuit since it uses small wire it can only create so much current.. so since it can only produce very little curent lets take advantage of potential more winds more voltage..   remember the secondary has no connection with any other circuit that is producing curent.. the only driver for the circuit is emf(electromotive force) what determines the current in secondary is frequency.. higher freq higher current is created in toroid / vic/ rotary vic. this is why 10-20khz is preferable for this circuit.. it is a low frequency,. meaning less current is being produced.  i sugest staying away from frequencys above 30khz i think it might cause our secondarys to burn up due to current.


outlawstc

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2009, 01:19:06 am »
Yeah yeah, you know it all dont you...

no you just are completely confused.

the switch over circuit works like a pingpong match......the ball is the water molecule.......

if you play ping pong. then you certainly understand that the ball never turns into 3 balls just by hitting it back and forth.

it has nothing to do with reading cryptic stanley meyer writings......THEY ARE NOT CRYPTIC...

the words i read are clearly READABLE.

but if you want to fancy with imagination then by all means you have the secret and a hint towards your new found glory.

i think you don't even know what your setup is doing and want to attach things you can't understand in an attempt to explain them.

you need to formulate before you fantasize.

read and understand concepts.

in this case i do know what i am talking about.

now i have considered alternating the tube cells when i first started.......but THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SWITCH OVER CIRCUITTTTTT......

PLEASE READ THE TECH BRIEF BEFORE I AM FORCED TO USE SCREENGRABS TO PROVE IT.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: New theory.....the real one?
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2009, 01:20:55 am »
Well I believe Donald said something interresting , what if we we stopping that electron from moving , what of we then appiled high voltage while the molecule is in this weakened state