Author Topic: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!  (Read 31070 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4440
    • water structure and science
Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« on: June 23, 2008, 22:31:30 pm »
Finally!
Someone did it  and published his art!

http://jnaudin.free.fr/wfc/index.htm

Go all and replicate this. This man is a genius!
 :D :D :D :D

Br
Steve


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • http://dudleysbasement.blogspot.com/
    • dudleys basement
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2008, 00:04:52 am »
looks kinda close to  his but i didnt insulate my electrode   i wonder what his gas output is  i found that the only thing resonance did was drop the voltage and ampreage needed to produce the same amount of gas   it didnt give me any more gas just super efficiancy   my wave here was at 50hz to 60 hz

jared

  • Guest
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2008, 02:31:40 am »
guys how feasible will it be for laymen to build this setup

here is the thing as i have stated before we have to get this out to the common folks most people cant scrounge up all the electronics and parts needed for a build, myself included, however with a little help we can form an "alliance" to get this stuff out. i will give my resources to further the effort i:e: time and money

stevie and the rest of the jedi council i realize that it may take some time for u guys to assemble the unit and make a tutorial but please hurry i need the relief in my own tank and a lot of other folks do 2, i am spending $250-$300 a week onb gas right now and its goin up, both the prices and the amount of driving that i do, ive got about 6 coworkers in the same boat sooooo.....         we are dish installers.
 

btw i havent seen anymore on the leds and stuff to change the state of the gas is this still a needed component?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • http://dudleysbasement.blogspot.com/
    • dudleys basement
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2008, 03:04:22 am »
smack booster and a pond fogger would give you some instant relief  for a couple hundred dollars  you could build one and install it in less than a week  if your real motivated

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 342
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2008, 05:52:18 am »
This is not all of stan meyer and his work has yet to be fully "cracked"

I do have a question about JNaudin's insulated tube if he could describe it in more detail.
Does he come to this forum?

hydro

  • Guest
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2008, 06:58:33 am »
What the guy is saying is he cracked water with little or hardly any amps at all with high voltage, he says the gas does not look like much but when you measure its output for some reason its rediculusly high!

Steve is emailing him, i ask for him to find his production, and transformer type. The information on that page has been backed up and saved and if the guy seems to be legit it will be tested, "not by me", i have to much on my hands right now, and i dont have the money to test every device someone claims to be overunity.

My point of  view is if You, or That Guy made water resonate with high voltage and low amps then this is something stan didn't do, therfor your the one that deserves the pat on the back. But this is just my point of view. I have tested this technology Long enough to understand stan LOVED his amp flow to his cell, matter of fact he could get more amps to the cell than we can, how he does it? im still working on it. But high volts low amps, you gots to prove me wrong, i say it cant be done, and i say stan didn't do this but his way of distraction! Anyways, you guys have the rest of your life to prove me wrong with using high voltage low amps to crack water, if you succeed i wouldn't be suprised.

I will end this post by saying, Test Report of Evaulation Page 60... 12.5 Volts 40 Amps 500 Watts 7 liters a Min. Now thats 4.4 amps per tube, 55 watts per tube.

Can you make 1 tube consume 4.4 amps with olmost an 8th inch gap?
How was that high volts low amps?
« Last Edit: June 24, 2008, 10:40:03 am by hydrocars »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2008, 08:36:36 am »
i look forward to what you have to offer h2opower....no one ever seems to want to hear anything differnet then the general populous.....for some reason certain events have been hushing the people on the soapboxes.......and hydrocars, i do not know as to why your thought process has turned to a destructive path in stanley meyers work....lets not stomp our feet and declare sour grapes.

hydro

  • Guest
Re: Stan Meyer cracked by JNaudin!!!!
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2008, 08:57:28 am »
right on h20! yes it may be sad, but i have a path just like you do. I have been so far into stans work i cant even begin to explain to anyone the facts so i don't bother. I can understand why you would think that stan used high voltage low amps, for one this is a big problem, because if stan used high voltage low amps, and if he did find the resonate Freq of wator than he never would have had that big clunky alternator on his dune buggy to start with, nor the clunky driver motor or that clunky rotory converter.

i pointed out that stans "tube" consumes 4.4 amps per tube, 40 amps for all 9 tubes and it is also in his test of evaulation. I am currently working on "how to make them tubes consume that while others are busy on the chase for resonation", they dont yet realize how hard it is to make a tube with such a gap consume that,  and to be honest i've done a pretty damn good job at doing it... So far i have ran an engine on as little as 500 cc's a min by ionizing the gas just like stan did, and herman, converting good ol 1h to 2h.. so basicly stan and herman did the same thing when making isotop hydrogen, when you read the patents you have to kinda read between the lines, when herman refers to 2h hard water he is actually meaning hydrogen with neutrons in it, which is 2h, just what stan used. the problem is the 2H is not volitile like gasoline but like deisel, this is where herman used Xrays and stan lasers, they both altered the gas and stans methode was the vic, this is where you're seeing high voltage low amps with resonate frequencies, the gas charges, it dont cost anything to ionize the gas.

now i've pointed out the test on page 60, and there is enough information there "math" ,"definitions", how too's on that page for you to actually replicate The test of stans in which he is explaining by using a 1 liter cavity. in which where stan produced 7 liters a min using a 1 liter cavity where 1 psi is = to 1 liter of hydroxy is "impossible", how do i know? well i tested it and confirmed it was impossible, this means if stan would have told the truth in that test of evaluation then his work would have been easily cracked, this is why he hollared 7 liters a min, but sadly when you use the math and conduct the test it tells no lie. My ideals and road of direction is based on facts, what was left behind and what is as well as what is possible and what is not possible.

I respect the ones thats trying to find the resonate freq of wator, if they succeed then they will be the wator gods! But im sorry to hear you think stan broke water with resonance and at the same time im happy that you're working on breaking water with resonance.  anyhow, this is no longer my forum, i chose to step down while the destraction was at work. i'm already making ways to do the possible.

if i have come across harsh in any way then honestly i do not mean to, sometimes my way of wording is not that great, i am just getting across to you that i am not on the same road your on, eventually when people do start to realize what is what, i might not be around.

god bless your tubes man.