Author Topic: Stanley Meyer said to  (Read 4915 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2387
  • Testing
Stanley Meyer said to
« on: December 27, 2012, 22:40:20 pm »
HOW many times did meyer say to add CO2 and none combustible gases to the mix?

Hydrogen + Carbon = Fuel!

Let me break ti down for you. Carbon injection of the 2:1 doesn't = hho. Injection of C02 into cold Pressurized water creates a Carbonated drink. The same Co2 used when welding on a mig welder. See youtube Carbonated drinks Diy.

Electrolysis of CO2 = A new synthetic gas not called hydroxy but more of an hydrocarbon contaminated gas in that form. A vacuum of your fuel cell just beore C02 injection is introduced before electrolysis process and results the missing carbon atom needed.

Have fun, See how to make a Carbonated drink on youtube, then do this to your water before electrolysis.

Stan clearly stated that he intoduced Co2 into the fuel cell, under a pressure. He injected Carbon and electrolysis extracts the Hydrogen and Carbon atoms from CO2 and H20 for a synthetic burn.

« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 23:08:35 pm by Hydrocars »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2387
  • Testing
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2012, 23:08:12 pm »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 423
  • let the voltage do the work
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2012, 00:01:40 am »
Maybe when you put nitrogen to the mix you get to a more propable mix that meyer maybe was after.. hydrocarbon reformation is another term you can look into: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalytic_reforming engine oil from lubrication inside cylinder walls has enough carbon elements to aid in the ignition of oxygen. What you say meyer was after is magnegas? mixing true HHO from HV with other elements inside gas processor will make new fuel.  Water is a very unique substance for it adapts to the environment.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2012, 00:17:41 am by geon »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 609
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2012, 00:17:41 am »
Stans brother even said no way out of carbon yet.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 423
  • let the voltage do the work
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2012, 00:19:19 am »
he probably used carbon and nitrogen to make nitromethane. air is 78% N2, 21% O2 .

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 609
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2012, 00:24:28 am »
he probably used carbon and nitrogen to make nitromethane. air is 78% N2, 21% O2 .

Stans generator did however produce an invisable flame, i'd like to not see one of those :0)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 423
  • let the voltage do the work
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2012, 00:27:41 am »
do you mean hydrazine?  gas analyzer is our friend. ;D but very expensive one :( be careful with such experiments.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2387
  • Testing
Re: Stanley Meyer said to
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2012, 01:07:07 am »
There is a hydrocarbon gas list somewhere showing hydrogen and carbon bonds and what gas they produce. My capslock is STicking on my keyboard. She ruins my keyboard everytime, Arg!!!!!!!!!!!!

there is steps  http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wo_zmmodH_g/TO50G-alJrI/AAAAAAAAAbA/0mkaIoj2N9s/s1600/hydrocarbon.JPG