I analysed this patent 1983 Stanley Meyer...
At first notice how the output can be feedback to the input...
It consists of two concentric magnetic rings with electromagnets arranged facing each others. In the middle a toroidal coil with a brass core rotate.
He states that an automotive alternator is a very ineffective way to generate voltage with restricted current, and that the EPG don't have adverse effects like opposing magnetic fields.
references of discussions about it..
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,976.0.htmlhttp://www.rexresearch.com/meyerhy/meyerhy.htmElectrical Power Generation:
Electrical Particle Generator (EPG) ~ Using a magnetized gas or slurry to produce electrical energy without any air-gap
EPG Mechanical Drive System ~ To propel said magnetized gas/slurry by mechanical displacement
EPG Electromagnetic Drive System ~ To propel said magnetized gas/slurry by EM deflection
EPG Laser Drive System ~ To propel said magnetized gas/slurry by photon or particle injection
Magnetic Spin Generator ~ Reorient dyne-axis of said magnetized gas/slurry by variable pulse voltage
Spiral Transformer Configuration ~ Pass electrical energy at high pulse voltage frequencies
Electrical Pulsing Generator ~ EM amplifier that produces a variable voltage frequencyElectrical Feedback Network:
Gas Activated Electrical Generator ~ Using a thermal pump to move said magnetized gas/slurry to produce electricity
Internal Combustion Electrical Generator ~ Using IC engine power by processed H gas to move magnetized gas/slurry to produce electricity
Fluid Drive Electrical Generator ~ Using H gas pressure to move magnetized gas/slurry to produce electricity
Electrical Polarization Generator ~ Using electrically charged gas to produce electrical energy