Author Topic: Resonance WFC measurements  (Read 36843 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 223
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #80 on: March 14, 2012, 09:58:58 am »
Hi webmug

thanks for the guide. I noticed that chokes are not exacty the same. Did you do that on perpose?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #81 on: March 14, 2012, 11:28:01 am »
Hi webmug

thanks for the guide. I noticed that chokes are not exacty the same. Did you do that on perpose?
Check the VIC coil pack readings from Dynodon, that is what my VIC coils are based on.

Why the chokes are not exactly the same? Check the Dynodon readings.
Matching voltage amplitude when WFC is connected on a resonance frequency I think.
(choke 1 self-capacitance is altered when wfc is connected, so voltage at resonance is not equal and opposite as choke 2, so choke 2 self-capacitance should be adjusted)

I have to wait for my 3 inch WFC to be machined and connect it to the VIC coil pack.

Br,
Webmug

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #82 on: March 14, 2012, 17:00:59 pm »
Is not the electricity, not the signals, not the configuration, not the lucky, not the good intent, nor the coincidence will split the water, only the physical principle can. Or you guys go look what meyer was really doing or you wont get it to work, cause without an idea of what you are doing, copying is worthless. Tip go look his citations and referenced by. HE was not really dumb, there are several methods to obtain the result, one better than others as much as complicated.


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #83 on: March 14, 2012, 17:31:25 pm »
Is not the electricity, not the signals, not the configuration, not the lucky, not the good intent, nor the coincidence will split the water, only the physical principle can. Or you guys go look what meyer was really doing or you wont get it to work, cause without an idea of what you are doing, copying is worthless. Tip go look his citations and referenced by. HE was not really dumb, there are several methods to obtain the result, one better than others as much as complicated.
Hi sebosfato,

How is your progress to split water SM KISS style?

Yes, SM was not dumb, I agree!  8)

Br,
Webmug

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #84 on: March 15, 2012, 02:46:45 am »
Hello webmug,

I'm working a different approach to try prove the EPP working principle. I'm using yet chokes and the cell, and pulsing with the pll. But the point is to understand what he was doing at molecular level inside the cell, this will preset the parameters needed to design the all thing. I developed a theory of the simplest possible method to accomplish over unity, is all thru the calculations inside the techbrief and any physicist or electronics engineer can understand. To understand a bit better what he was doing you need learn all about a fuel cell, all about electrolysis, all about high frequency and all about electronics. Yet you need to know well chemistry, a bit of engineering design, physics, math and have a great deal of lucky and money. His principle is really KISS but you got to have a bit knowledge to replicate it from nothing but puzzles.   
Than how the vic doubles the frequency, how to restrict the amps and make voltage to take over and do work in a dead short condition. 
He wrote his tech brief knowing that he was going to die and would not finish his work. So in the tech brief he left some info exclusively to let someone later on to understand what he was doing. He was really generous. He left the principle for the chosen one to find, hide in the engineering design principles of operation. He was completely crazy as well, the one, will conclude this when understand it and re-read the tech brief.   
Than his later work is about collision, it was developed to get over a big problem in the simplest design which limits the over unity and size.
I can't give a clue to anyone, but will give you the sure that it will exist soon as technology, and at least i told you all i studied to get closer to it. And tell you that i'm not the one cause i didn't arrived to this only by my own legs.

The big deal is not even to put it to work, but to spread out to the world in a safe manner, so after all you should also be a sociologist to avoid making the world a worst place because of the technology goods.
:-X

br
sebs
« Last Edit: March 15, 2012, 03:09:55 am by sebosfato »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #85 on: March 15, 2012, 10:42:52 am »
Seb,you say that Stan was leaving clues in the techbrief,i don't think so,look at the '93 colorado movie when he say you can buy his book(the brief) with 20$.So that was in 93 and he was not have lunched the wfc on the market,so the point is :he would not leave clues in a 20$ book that anyone could buy,you said he knowed that he will die and for that publish that book...but what if in the time of lets say 1year before he launches the wfc on the market,someone figures the puzzle from his book,what happens???Firstily I read the techbrief too,and it was so complex and tangeled that blow my head off,because when he explain a process he loose you in another details from another process and not finish what it started to explain...and when he is refering to a FIG,or a given number on the FIG,the fig or numbers arrent there,maybe the brief was hacked,choped off...Then when I read the patents cronologicaly I UNDERSTANT 90% of what he was saying,so the final poin is :he would not sale you his tech for 20$ for anyone to figure it out and replicate.
And i want to ask you something:i was reading your theories about the wfc here on this forum and other when you asked for donations to buy capacitors diodes etc...i think you saw the estate photos and the info that Don provided so my question is where to you see big capacitor connected to wfc and where do you see thick wire chokes on the vic coil...all wire was cooper 29AWG,so i think you figured something and you are close but not quite on the right track.
Good luck on your experiments!!

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #86 on: March 15, 2012, 14:03:18 pm »
Yes that was my first attempts, I learned a lot from it...I'm glad you went there and looked, thats way to learn. Principally what is resonance, choke... Meyer told us that he could do it in many ways, ss wire or copper... I was trying to check high Q coils and recirculating current and stored energy. Now i have a bit different approach.

Of course he was not going to give it out for 20 bucks but it is right there in front of us, thats why i call him completely crazy. I'm saying that if you have the knowledge of the prior art and you believe, you can find the solution. Of course is almost impossible.. it took me 6 years and lot of help, to arrive there. Is a big puzzle. But its there.

I think he was not worry that someone replicate it, cause he knew it was impossible for him to make this come out to the market at that time would be worst to who replicated.

The secret if i'm really right, is so simple that it can be explained in less than 1 min. I'm not willing to share it now, first i need to prove what i'm saying and do what i need to do to take it to the market, and is not my patent so i can't give out details for now...  However the hho community is being considered, as source of people highly interested in the subject, and i would like to invite soon most of you to work with us if desired.
The reason why i can't share it is that there are sharks ready to replicopyit and say is their merit in understanding SM tech. I tell you is not my merit to understood it, i simply put it together... I could never say well i'm a genius, its all mine. The people working here with me that really deserves the merit, 1° to have wait 50 years to even patent it, 2° to trust me and in a better world.

Wish you luck too
Br
sebs

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Resonance WFC measurements
« Reply #87 on: March 16, 2012, 13:06:20 pm »
Great, another wannabe who is the only one who has the 'solution'.
This is what hinders research. Egos get in the way.
How many times have we been down this road?
You guys can do what you like, but if I discover a way to make water from fuel I guarantee you guys on this forum will be the first I give full disclosure to - no if's and's or buts!
I don't think I am God's gift to the world, nor am I greedy