Author Topic: Bob Boyce  (Read 32464 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #80 on: March 08, 2009, 05:38:38 am »
As expensive as THE CELL is, how many people can afford it? How about maintenance and getting rid of the brown stuff?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #81 on: March 08, 2009, 06:42:16 am »
Hi guys
                Oh dear he is not going to play the game any more, what would make him a much more respected man he has admitted the mistake, let him explain the outcome of what happens, if the bord is corrected to the schismatics. When he looked at it, as an electronics engineer, he would know what would happen, he has not posted any scope pics, that one was from some one else.
He chose to take his bat and ball and go home and close the site.
Have you read the last few posts, it is likely to be wiped off, but I will use controller , HEX controller, the make of the chip all I like. How ever I will be looking into using a PIC, wouter is as well. I will be testing three boards now, the unaltered one, that we made, the one that I have and will Modify, and the  Les Banki one.

yaro
   ASK BOB BUT i DO NOT THINK  HE WILL TELL YOU. AND OUR GROUPS  SMALL CELL IS BETTER THAN HIS ANY HOW, MORE OUTPUT AND VERY CLEAN.
YES STEVE THERE IS NOT ONE THAT I CAN FIND EITHER. 

CowboyRX how you doing with yours ?
 

That’s all for now.
aussepom   

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4443
    • water structure and science
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #82 on: March 08, 2009, 22:11:30 pm »
I like your view on things, Aussepom!

br
steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #83 on: May 03, 2009, 05:27:51 am »
 hi Steve then check this out

Here is the link to the Utube clip, there was an splat there but that was the scope earth lead touching something that it shouldn't, always clip it back if you are not using it.

     well there is not much more going to happen with this unit.

         
   ??? ??? ???
 dankie what do you think?

aussepom

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #84 on: May 03, 2009, 18:02:18 pm »
Aussepom,

I know that the brute force method works very well in a large series cell and works exactly as described by Bob. The efficiencies i those cells are 150-200% Faraday. So, I was surprised by the brute force output of your 101 plate cell. If built properly, it should produce 33-50LPM @ 3300watts  (220v and 15A) with 1/8" spaced 6x6" 316L plates, ~25% KOH by weight @ ~50 deg C.

Everyone is still waiting to see 'resonance'

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #85 on: May 03, 2009, 21:02:07 pm »
Hi
well we did not take it past 204v that got 14lts per min at 10amps, it was getting hot quickly, and at the time we did not want to destroy it before trying the PWM3F on it.
If the pwm was going to work then the high voltage is no good. Bob states it has to be at 1.5v per cell, 150v, and that is what we did, also he states at this voltage the current would  be in the in the order of several hundred mA it was mentioned some where  200mA is what he had, and yes we got the same result.
we know that the output of the toroid was working ok, as seen in the photobucket vid with the test circuit.
Now all were looking for was a large increase in the output, this would have certainly been noticed with the few bubbles that we had.
This then would have shown that there was 'something else' there but it did not.
 so we put out the challenge to Bob.  I do not expect him to, if he does show us all how it is done with all the relevant details then I will take my hat off to him.  however I will not hold my breath for it to happen.
aussepom

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #86 on: May 03, 2009, 21:18:48 pm »
Just too difficult to replicate like Bob Says ...

I'm sorry , this is a real heartbreaker ... But somewhere along some tiny bit of evidence , an obervation or w/e has to pull you in a certain direction and narrow it down evr more closely ... It seems you never had that moment , I am sure you were really looking hard .

But this Bob Boyce story smelled fishy right from the start ... What kind of guy gets to understand this science but cant properly release a pulsing circuit that doesnt have this "ghost" in the circuit that makes things 100 times more complicated. And also , things like this dont just "happen" , he basicly lucked out on that boat because of some diode ?? Give be a break ... Impossible... If its so hard to tune then how can "gods luck" make it work with some "broken diode" lol ... Thats one a 99999999 chance

 Bad shit again from panacea who always find themselves releasing absolute bogus .

Too bad you were not around here when I said this

http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,726.0.html



Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4443
    • water structure and science
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #87 on: May 03, 2009, 22:59:31 pm »
Hi Aussepom,

I seen your video message to Bob. I totally agree with you on this. Me too didnt have any sign of something mysterious, or big trick.
Its all bogus of the first degree.

Maybe, if Bob has balls, he tell you what to do, but he probably will not. He just wants BIG money.

Steve