Author Topic: Bob Boyce  (Read 32470 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

hydro

  • Guest
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2008, 17:41:59 pm »
thank you kevin, i'll try and get up with bob asap, my energy for today has escaped me :/

Bob Boyce

  • Guest
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2008, 20:03:54 pm »
Hey Hydro,

Bob replied to me through yahoo water4fuel watercar group.  That group has gotten so huge and I get 70+ e-mails a day from them, so I'm thinking about leaving the group.  This is his yahoo e-mail: REMOVED

This was his reply to me:

It's not worth continuing.

Steven Harris goes overboard to obtain products of math for typical
poorly efficient Faraday style electrolysis, then tries to apply that
math to everything. He is so off base when it comes to boosting with
hydroxy gas.

Nothing in Stevens math accounts for the typically higher production
efficiency of common ducted hydroxy gas generation, nor does he
account for the much higher combustion energy obtained by adding
hydroxy gas to hydrocarbon fuels. It takes far less than 5% per BTU
to get a significant boost using hydroxy gas, unlike tank hydrogen.
All of Stevens data and experience (what little there is as compared
to the real expert, Roy McCallister) are with tank hydrogen, not
hydroxy gas. At least Roy McCallister is honest about it, and will
tell anyone that asks that he has no experience with hydroxy gas.
Steven Harris cops an attitude like you're pissing in his ear or
something if you bring up the subject.

Bob

Thanks a whole lot Kevin for posting my email address in the open in a public group. I have been deluged with spam since you did this, now I know why. Thanks to you I have to drop another perfectly good email address and obtain another one.  You can bet this next one will not be given out to anyone in the groups!

Bob

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 110
  • Look out for the M I B
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2008, 20:32:47 pm »
hehehe

i recon u got quite a few mails and just as many question, im shure he didnt intend for this tho
if ur the Bob im thinking of, i hope it was just releaving of some steam, and not that ur steping down from the HHO research
btw do u know if pulses hawe been used on PEM cells or hawe u tried it?


BR

Mr Browngass

hydro

  • Guest
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2008, 01:04:55 am »
i've taken the email down, even if it doesn't help.

from now on, any emails i find will be removed.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 01:08:03 am by hydrocars »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2008, 01:06:41 am »
to all, i have been studying bob boyce's work for some time as well as many others.  i have found a PDF file with detailed instructions about getting a car to run on water.  this has the full construction of a 61 plate cell, with the electronics and many other components that he uses.  I was wondering if anyone had experimented with his plate technology and have had any success?

Badnova

Kevin

  • Guest
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #21 on: March 10, 2008, 10:51:21 am »
Quote from: Login to see usernames
Thanks a whole lot Kevin for posting my email address in the open in a public group. I have been deluged with spam since you did this, now I know why. Thanks to you I have to drop another perfectly good email address and obtain another one.  You can bet this next one will not be given out to anyone in the groups!

Bob

This e-mail is already open to 7,000 people in the watercar forum so adding it to a forum of 114 members should not have done what you claim.  None the less I apologize for adding it to this forum.

-Kevin

PS:  We could sure use another good brain around here so don't run off to quickley.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2008, 04:02:35 am by Kevin »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2008, 17:38:39 pm »

hydro

  • Guest
Re: Bob Boyce
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2008, 06:59:12 am »
cars do run on water so does diesels! to run a diesel on water all you have to do is get the engine hot and switch over to water.. This has been tested and it worked. Even stanley meyer later own used a direct water injector to run his engine 125 psi directly into the cylinder chamber.  The problem is when you run directly off water your engine does not hold up. from what i've herd from a local source is a diesel engine will only last about 3 months.

i'm unsure of what hydrogen gas will do to an engine but it want be no where near as bad as using pure water. Bob boyce uses additives and he conditions his cells well.  it takes him many days to do this and Sometimes if you get a contaminated conditioning process you have to start all back over. bobs cell produces a crapload of hydrogen but his hydrogen is different than the hydrogen you would produce without using additives. it appears like there is a lack of oxygen when additives are used.

 i've herd that bob said at a certain frequency the hydrogen does change but i'm still unclear of what the change may be, it still cant compare to clean hydrogen. When you condition a cell like that and you apply the right wave forms like bob has applied then you do get a burst of hydroxy but this burst requires additives, our enemy. so therefor there is certain area's where bobs setup is very benifitable over normal electrolysis.

bobs setup also requires neutral plates, without additives his setup would not work period. The reason bobs cell is so energy efficient is because when he applies the pure Dc power to the plates the take a great charge made possible from the additives, there's something odd happening with his cell when he does this, and it works. bob then applies another wave on top of that pure dc wave to break the bonds of water. Why cant this be done without additives? it can, you havent found the proper cell setup yet.

for this to be true with out additives there must be a no additive cell, meaning, a cell that is in series that will conduct and take a charge without additives.. when you find this cell, you can do what bob does without additives and your hydroxy will be clean. but producing the hydrogen and knowing what to do with it is another story. with bobs setup you produce it and use it directly after its produced. bobs gas is great on demand. each way has their advantages. but bob is real and has spent much time in doing this gas from water stuff. its understandable that bob uses additives, this is his way of doing things.

there's more to stans technology than what i' have offered to the public, and  there's nothing wrong with mixing magic tricks into this technology like stan has done. my research is mostly done by me alone where my sidekicks gets lured away and sometimes i do get thrown but i always manage to pull things back together. it's like a weed that messes with your head but  the buzz can go away if you put the pipe down, and  the longer you let the pipe be the clearer things get.

it would be good for many of you to go back and learn how the atom was found and the history behind it. who and how the little atom was discovered anyways? how did they know electrons exist and who discovered that and how?

back to my hole lol.

« Last Edit: April 18, 2008, 07:08:13 am by hydrocars »