Author Topic: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.  (Read 17496 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
MOLECULAR DISSOCIATION OF WATER  A PROJECT FOR THE EXPERIMENTER BY DAN DANFORTH 

In. the original setup that Stan Meyer showed us, he used 36 volts as the basic potential applied to the reaction chamber. He also commented that stainless steel ( 410 not 403 ) was the only metal that could be used as oxides formed with all others. His original chamber used 18 inch long by 0.375 inch diameter (o.d.) rod surrounded by 1 inch diameter (i.d.) 16 inch long pipe. The reason for the difference in length is for mechanical ease of construction. My prototype used 14 inch long rod and 12 inch long pipe of similar diameters as the drawing indicates.   Having a severe lack of parts diversity here in Sri-Lanka, I was only able to obtain a 24 volt. 8 amp transformer and built my circuitry around that. The final output is 20 volts with Ml reading 10 amps to the pulsing circuit which generates a symetricel squarewave ( 50% duty cycle ) to the flyback inductor connected in series with the chamber as the schematic shows. The flyback high voltage spike is directed across the chamber via c* end d*. The use of a high voltage spike alone, without the current being delivered through the liquid, will not cause the disassociation to take place. This I verified using an ignition coil in place of the inductor and applied the secondary with halfwave rectification and blocking capacitor to prevent burn out to the chamber with no results. Apparently the current in the water aligns the molecules approprately to allow the high voltege spike to do its workr which in my opinion is the stimulation of molecular resonance. Once Stan's unit was made to begin breakdown (which takes 6 to 8 seconds) he was able to reduce both current and voltage to miniscule proportions. I attribute this to sympathetic oscillation of the aligned molecules, requiring very little in the way of additional excitation. A phenomena akin to Tesla `s super resonance... resulting in Stan discovering that he only had to supply three pulses in ten to satisfy the requirement of the chamber. I have not yet had the opportunity to duplicate this portion of the experiment but, in time I vill.   Duplication of the device described in these pages, however, will produce the phenomena and hopefully launch other enterprising end inventive souls on to designing their own refined models. It would be nice to have feedback so that we can all collectively work to bring about the transition to non-pollution energy.   P.S.- Tho electrical circuit is by no means optinised, but represents instead the result of parts availability here. Any good technician could improve on it quite readily.   There are two primary frequencies that produce the best results. They are. 14372 Hz and 43430 Hz. The former is about 50% more efficient, but it seems that just about any frequency between 9 KHz and 143762 KHz works quite well. 1) This is because the nature of the wave form ( a spike ) is rich in harmonics and one of them is bound to be close to one of the two primary frequencies.   Use of permanent magnets may also increase efficiency. I'll give you the outcome of that attempt in my next letter along with the plans for what I hope to be a much improved version.   Note: Sub-harmonics of the two primary frequencies at which dissociation will occur:
43430 Hz             143762 HZ  SUBHARMONIC          SUBHABMONIC  1st 21715    HZ      1st 71881    HZ  2nd 14476.67 HZ      2nd 47920.67 HZ  3rd 15517.5  HZ      3rd 35840.1  HZ  4th 8686     Hz      4th 28752.4  HZ    *1500 VOLTS IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR MOLECULAR RINGING TO BEGIN.   The ball is now in your court.   Let's get the game started and have as many players as possible.   From the legal stand point it can be argued in an international court of law that the vital need of this technology by every nation to aleviate the critical threat to our environment globally is so greet as to justify nullification of proprietry rights if those rights are used to delay or prevent distribution of the technology and if such delay or prevention - including measured and / or levied distribution so as to restrict or limit its use, or for the purposes of financial profit isolate significent economic groups from its use and if such acts previously mentioned can be shown to cause an increased danger to life, persons involved in such acts can be convicted of intent to do bodily harm by crime of omission.   (ANY MATERIAL SENT TO `TUNING IN' WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE ABOVE WRITER.)   Back to the Mad Scientist's Lair   
 
 
    Source publication: Unknown
Scanned from very bad photocopy.   
 
 
« Last Edit: September 14, 2010, 21:31:16 pm by Steve »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 457
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2010, 13:30:28 pm »
I have not yet had the opportunity to duplicate this portion of the experiment but, in time I vill. 
I'll wait for that ;)

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2010, 15:35:17 pm »
I have not yet had the opportunity to duplicate this portion of the experiment but, in time I vill. 
I'll wait for that ;)

 ;D
« Last Edit: September 14, 2010, 16:04:32 pm by Steve »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2010, 21:07:55 pm »
How has everyone been? I saw Dankie over on the other forums and I thought I'd check in and see what was cooking. Been working on solid state systems over the past year or two. Found some interesting things with high voltage driving coils. Anyone duplicated the JLN tests? They looked pretty simple and promising.

Tad

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2010, 21:30:23 pm »
How has everyone been? I saw Dankie over on the other forums and I thought I'd check in and see what was cooking. Been working on solid state systems over the past year or two. Found some interesting things with high voltage driving coils. Anyone duplicated the JLN tests? They looked pretty simple and promising.

Tad

Hi Tad,
 
No, nobody did a succesfull replication of JNL. Neither we could replicate your succes as well.
Have you ever found the details of your succesful tests of the resonance setup?
 
Give Dankie our regards, btw... ;D
 
Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 52
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2010, 21:36:52 pm »
Hi Steve.

Interesting replication, my question is; Is Dan's replication based upon the Rotary Pulse Voltage Frequency unit (alternator sett up)?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2010, 21:48:28 pm »
No. My system was as a stated in other threads, similar to JLN's but not as simple. My data was for my cell only anyways, there are no secrets. As you have seen on the JLN site, the circuit needs to be tuned to each new cell that is built. I can build another system once I have these two projects done, but honestly this type of system requires so much time in tuning and such that it is not much fun.

My biggest problem was in scaling it up. I never got the system to run in larger sizes, so it was useless to me. My investors did go see the truck in Arizona that is running on straight water though. I didn't think it could work because of the low voltage and high current but apparently it does, they checked the whole truck out and found no gasoline anywhere, and they also drove the car.

Wells (the inventor) has cancer but it looks like he is making sure others know how he built the system so it wont be lost if he dies. The inside story is that he is mixing two or more frequencies in order to create large volumes of gas. The truck ran 3000 miles or more on water, using 1 gallon of water for every 350 miles or so, which is what Stan said as well.

Tad

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Dan Danforth replication of Stan Meyer's work, after a meeting with Stan.
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2010, 22:36:25 pm »
Steve,

I sent you a PM for my skype contact. I have to get back to work, but if you have any questions or need help hit me up on Skype or email.

Tad