Steve, way to go with the efficiency you noted.
I have a feeling its even higher, the reason being how did you make the measurement (LPM)?
Guessing you have used water displacement method for the LPM measurement.
From tests done by another reliable source it shows that easily 35% to 50% more output with a mass flow measurement device like Coriolis.
Water displacement although good, you must overcome some grams of force up to many grams of opposing forces to make the displacement measurement.
For that reason if water displacement method was used your numbers are actually higher.
Anyways again real nice to hear good results.
Hi Komtek,
I measured indead with the magic 1.5 litre bottle and a bucket of water.
Its sounds nice when you say that the reality might be even better
What Sebos is telling about using 273 degree kelvin is i think also right.
But his calculation is not. The difference between 273 and 293K makes on the totall calc a change of max 7%.
So, accoording to Haithar i do here a 109% minus 7 % = still 2 % better......
I dont have time to show the totall calc but maybe later i will publish that one.
But at this moment i do measure like the whole HHO community does and compared to them and compared to what the Anton group does, i do good here.
Steve
