Author Topic: Is this what SM was doing?  (Read 6876 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Is this what SM was doing?
« on: January 26, 2010, 02:52:05 am »
I tripped over this page tonight

http://www.hho-generator.de/en/hho-power-supply.htm

I'd like to build an electrical crossover switching circuit to add to my mess.

any ideas and help would be welcomed   < even a light push in the right direction, I am a quick study.. 

see image from the page

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2010, 03:21:59 am »
nothing to do with SM at all. You want to learn about him, read his patents and tech brief, watch his lectures, and think

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2010, 03:22:19 am »
I did an post on what I thing Stan did . My opinion is that his designs were still in the works . Reading all this again I find it less and less conclusive as to how the charge exchange occured with the Steel . I think he was visualising and explaining his theories and ideas . It certainly follows a straight arrow logic .


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8665.msg224897#msg224897
« Last Edit: January 26, 2010, 03:46:48 am by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2010, 03:27:18 am »
SM used an electrical crossover switching circuit.  Can anyone point me in a direction to build one for my plate experiments?   

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2010, 03:29:48 am »
SM used an electrical crossover switching circuit.  Can anyone point me in a direction to build one for my plate experiments?

I believe an H bridge firts that definition .

Haithar made the same system .

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2010, 03:49:13 am »
THANKS Dankie, I'm learning about H-bridge circuits as I sit here, maybe Haithar has something workable to share

Are we all to bow to Meyer around here or suffer the condescention?  sheezzzz

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2010, 04:00:10 am »
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5132-1872-elihu-thomson-anyone-got-document-scientific-american-1872-a-2.html

The Meyers question is basicly that of , can an opposing bifilar actually split the molecule . Is this simple concept true at all ?

Forget about scalar , Can it split the molecule ? What is scalar ?

I have theorized on that long and hard , only to witness people telling me it didnt work . What they did wrong taht anybody would probably do wrong I do not know .

I never actually had my VIC . I would wish to identidy how the energy was dissipated and the so called unipolar . It is clear that Kinesis or John never had the skills to test it , they should have sent it to me . Kinesis basicly couldnt even pulse it right ,.

In fact , that thief John Bostik stole my Dynodon wire from me .
« Last Edit: January 26, 2010, 04:40:40 am by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Is this what SM was doing?
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2010, 04:25:07 am »
charged molecules bouncing between plates

caused by pulsed dc

my observations always have shown a momentary good blush of gas following plate polarity reversal and return to power..

I just want to do it faster and controllable, and see, see, that's what we do, we build and see