Author Topic: Error in Stans Gas production  (Read 25199 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #24 on: January 16, 2010, 21:40:39 pm »
Well I dont know , its all internet rumors from 15 year old thing . I dont believe anything from google regarding this .
Wsnt he dinning with NATO troops ? I dont think NATO would have financed that ...

If he really died that would be good ... Sorry Stan ...

In the event of Stan s death , what would of happened with that money anyways ?

Here is a report , it seems like he did die and vomitted in a parking lot ...  I would like to see that official certificate of death or get this confirmed by a witness .

I would be strange if he was never exumed and never had a burial for a christian ...

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg14099.html
« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 22:12:28 pm by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2010, 21:59:08 pm »
i see  that stan could have a misleading statement but if stans graph is tru 25 volts each  @4.4amps will produce 1000cc a min,,    50 volts will do 2,000cc a min @4.4 amps.. 100 volts will do 4000cc in a min,,, he shows that when u reach 12.6 @4.4 amps the climb in production becomes proportional with voltage compared to electrolysis.. 

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4441
    • water structure and science
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2010, 22:16:01 pm »
my 2 cents:

Stan deliverd the gas under a little bit of pressure.
If you look at the vid of the Idle buggy, or if you look at the pics of similar test, you always see that they keep the tubecell underpressure.
So, they release gas from a cavity under pressure.

That has 2 reasons.
1. the engine cannot suck all gas out of the cell. That is very import. I see that importance in my own tests.
2. As long as the cell is under pressure, you have less change for backfire.

The amount of gas coming out of such pressure system, is the same as from a non presure system...as far as i was able to see and measure.



Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 363
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2010, 22:35:31 pm »
when the buggy was idling in the driveway,he states 13.5 psi, 5 volts and 2 amps to the rotor.The gages are hooked to the rotor of the alternator,and has no refference to the volts on the cell.
Don

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2010, 23:30:01 pm »
Well I tried googling all of the deaths and funerals of past inventors like Henry Moray , EV gray , Puharich etc ...

All pretty much a big nothing about death or relatives information or funeral in the first 5 pages basicly ... Some conspiracies etc ...

Pretty much as you would expect , this is not found on google but in town records etc ...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • http://dudleysbasement.blogspot.com/
    • dudleys basement
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #29 on: January 17, 2010, 00:23:47 am »
even if you think that stan is still alive you should still be respectfull of his family and others and stop saying his cold dead lifeless body it just not polite


Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2010, 01:20:15 am »
even if you think that stan is still alive you should still be respectfull of his family and others and stop saying his cold dead lifeless body it just not polite

W/E ... Stan or Stephen wont be reading these posts .

I need to be sure that he died the way they say he did .




Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: Error in Stans Gas production
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2010, 10:18:34 am »
even if you think that stan is still alive you should still be respectfull of his family and others and stop saying his cold dead lifeless body it just not polite

W/E ... Stan or Stephen wont be reading these posts .

I need to be sure that he died the way they say he did .


@Dankie

Man, what is going to change for you, if you know it? You don't believe he was poisoned? I'm almost completely sure. Do you know why? Because i'm sure that his system works! And i can say, you should not find out about his death. Think about if he had a kind of life stile like trying to save the world, while people didn't helped him like he thought they should. And if he just said, oh boy i don't want to  have to continue living being the water car inventor and at the same time being a failure because of the  inability to release it, because also of the threats.  Maybe he still alive and have faked his death, to try to live a "normal" life. Big deal. What do you think, that you are going to find him? You wont. If he was able to invent the wfc, he is also able to disappear too, so forget about this and let his secretes to rest in peace. Living or not living, the important is that his ideas will remain alive forever.

So again, I can ask you a favor, Please don't touch the past! you will find very terrible surprises, and probably takes out an history that must remain secret. Respect Stan He really deserves.

check this movie is quite nice and source of inspiration.