Author Topic: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC  (Read 21204 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4440
    • water structure and science
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #48 on: December 29, 2013, 19:12:33 pm »
Ady,

Another member of this forum used the same setup.
WATCH HIS VIDEO ON THIS

He shows you the meters!

Steve

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4440
    • water structure and science
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #49 on: December 29, 2013, 19:21:54 pm »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #50 on: December 29, 2013, 20:06:14 pm »
Thanks Steve!You said same power in same power out but you and the user showed more amps at the cell.When you measured  the amps at the variac after the bridge and cap the amps drawn was like at the cell?
I tried that skematic but ,nothing special hapened.I also tried the setup with a coil,a cap and 2tubes separated by 2diodes,i reached 180v on the ceramic cap but bo bubles from the tubes...

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4440
    • water structure and science
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #51 on: December 29, 2013, 23:57:42 pm »
Hi Adys,

Here is the setup drawing of PT.
Also attached is a video you do not see on youtube. You can see his bifilarcoil in there. Its a toroid.
My was what i send you by email.
Ill guess my email to you was not complete.
Hope you can replicate this.
Please share your results!

Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #52 on: December 30, 2013, 00:29:25 am »
Thanks very much Steve.I will give it a try.The problem is i  did not have a large toroid like that,only  1.5cm dia ferite rods.From what i saw in his setup its more power out than in, because of the colapsing magnetic field of the coil,but for this colapsing magnetic field to take place there must be amps flowing trough the setup to create it.Stan is also showing 5A consumption on the 8xa setup.
Cheers!

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4440
    • water structure and science
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #53 on: December 30, 2013, 00:45:36 am »
I tuned my 100 windings of 1mm wire bifilar coil into a situation similar to PT's.
I only used less voltage into the system.
Hydrocars as well succeeded.
You will see. You can do this, Ady.

Steve

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 241
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #54 on: December 30, 2013, 02:10:21 am »
Thanks for the encouragement Steve,i will keep you posted.
Cheers!

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 423
  • let the voltage do the work
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #55 on: December 30, 2013, 10:34:37 am »
I have an idea how he gets more power out.. he is using analog meters for pulsed signals..not showing the rms value..