Author Topic: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC  (Read 23207 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

• Hero member
• Posts: 4530
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2009, 10:07:51 am »

http://www.futurlec.com/RelSS.shtml

They could handle big power, and wrap the inductor with heavier wire, mebbe?

Turtle

Hi preacher,

Those SRR's are nice toys to play with. I had some.
The trick is more to find a switch with as less resistance as possible and no sparks during switching.
The heavier wire is good. Less resistance too. Any bulky wrapped coil is killing.

Steve

« Last Edit: October 24, 2009, 07:13:42 am by Warp »

• 50+
• Posts: 84
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2009, 20:08:20 pm »
...Results are getting better when lower amps are used.
The sad thing is of course that with lower amps, production is going down as well.Steve

Do you drop the voltage to get the lower amps Steve?

• Hero member
• Posts: 2388
• Testing
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #26 on: September 18, 2009, 04:19:57 am »
Sounds like to me,,, You need High current,, and high voltage, Hrmmm..

Can Some one Please tell me what happens when you Put High Voltage and High Current together? Hint, Electric field, Magnetic Field

Why is there No Voltage fields when using Low voltage at high currents?
Why is there No Magnetic fields when using High Voltage at Low currents?

What happens if you put High voltage, with high current? You get a Load of Power consumption in the Giga Ga Lomba Major wattage, ;

Imagine, 100,000 Volts, 250 amps ~ ~ Thats 25,000,000 Watts! Would that Have Contain Both Magnetic and High voltage fields?

How can this system be tricked? I seriously do not know, However, I do know the best production of gas will come from either 120 volts, or 220 with a Meaty and Photatoy current flow, Say 7 amps.

Just what i feel about that. Fun to post for me, sadly i cant test anything.

• 50+
• Posts: 68
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #27 on: September 18, 2009, 04:32:04 am »
I think this is relatred to cavitation , water is being trashed around with those inductive kicks , back and forth back and forth ,,, There is a resonance point to any motion ... With a 3tubes setup with alternating polarity there is no bubble build up is what I have discovered ..

+ the electron phase ? We dont see that .

Also , DC offset , important ...

• Sr. member
• Posts: 457
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2009, 13:00:00 pm »
Why is there No Voltage fields when using Low voltage at high currents?
Why is there No Magnetic fields when using High Voltage at Low currents?
by looking at the energy equastions E = 1/2 * C * U²  for electric and E  = 1/2 * L * I²  you can see that when there is current or voltage, both fields will exist. They may be too small to be measured, but they exist.
Of course i'm refering to a capacitor and a coil connected together, otherwise C or L is nearly zero.

• Hero member
• Posts: 4530
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #29 on: September 18, 2009, 14:23:36 pm »
...Results are getting better when lower amps are used.
The sad thing is of course that with lower amps, production is going down as well.Steve

Do you drop the voltage to get the lower amps Steve?

When i tune the frequency of the circuit, i see a very clear amp dip, but voltage stays the same. (Stan Meyer: Voltage takes over!!!! Amp inhibiting!!!)
I also see amps dropping when the voltage is tuned down, but thats the natural behaviour of electrolysis.

Steve

• 50+
• Posts: 84
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #30 on: September 18, 2009, 15:15:45 pm »
Great stuff Steve!

Have you tried playing around with harmonics? of your frequency?

I'm still not sure if this frequency is cell specific, or electrolyte specific?
What changes it?

People I suggest clicking; File; Save As; for the pages of this thread.

Anyonee else testing this?

• Hero member
• Posts: 4530
Re: Pulsed signal 60% more effective then strait DC
« Reply #31 on: September 18, 2009, 16:19:30 pm »
Great stuff Steve!

Have you tried playing around with harmonics? of your frequency?

I'm still not sure if this frequency is cell specific, or electrolyte specific?
What changes it?

People I suggest clicking; File; Save As; for the pages of this thread.

Anyonee else testing this?

It seems that its just me having fun.

Steve