Results from some tests...

[Login to see usernames]

I threw away my stupid measurement equipment and restarted everything...

I tried with one metal side on the rubber spacers, results are very interesting.

Next I will try to use a SS container. Then longer and thinner pipes.

[Login to see usernames]

that was this patent, all from the same patent, in the order taken out

you can see the slot refers to a different drawing

The whole resonant cavity and effects can be summarized by C

The patent talks about very low voltage and much lower current, this is before the discovery of a resistor or choke at the negative, or does it? havent read the whole patent.

Gauss, try a [choking] coil on the negative plate only. Or, if you find resonance with vibration, play with the dutycycle, I have a feeling the wavelength of the gap is also or more related to the duty cycle than to the frequency. Perhaps vibration disappears without a decrease in gas production.

[Login to see usernames]

@Alan, I will try it in due time... Now I am disappointed with my pipes.... I want to get them thinner and longer.

Just had a very interesting finding, if you hang one cylinder from the top and one from the bottom so one pipe is free for vibration in the top and one in the bottom, you get NO GAS. That shows this works like a transmitter and a receiver. Both pipes must be free to get any gas, they are communicating. Over to the next test...

[Login to see usernames]

longer and thinner does sound good, i've tested by tubes trying to get them to ring and they just dont, too thick, it's just a clank, stainless is very dense... compared to aluminum. if i had an aluminum tube of the same dimensions it would ring, but since the stainless is heavy it takes more to get it to vibrate, i think i might machine my tubes down on the lathe and see if making them thinner will help the tone.

stans demo cell says 35/40 thousands, outside/inside, 39.37 thousands is a mm. note the inside is thicker which makes sense if you want to design them match tone.

anyone buying new tubes, get them thin!

[Login to see usernames]

Gauss ,

I would like to see a video so I can  listen the sound see this effect for myself and say " Now this is the way to go " .

I believe in this theory and Keely but I wanna see your video first so I can start working on this the Dankie way , not the imaginary way like some ppl .

[Login to see usernames]

Ok Dankie, but to make bubbles and hang the cylinders in the cables, anyone can do that. After you have gotten the bubbles you want to go further. I have never made a video and do not even know how to do it, surely I will need to do it but first I want to experiment a bit more.

As you have the picture of how tyo hang the cell you can get a quick start. Otherwise just wait for the video, no stress.

[Login to see usernames]

@Donaldwfc

I don't see the problem with the tube thickness, as the patent p7 line22 said...

"If the distance between the inner and outer sphere is of a wavelength related to the frequency of the pulsating direct current applied to the water, the water molecule will be set in motion and thereafter enhanced in motion in the resonant cavity 3 and exceed the impediment of water"

I want to know what SM means with the signal generated in FIG2.b.

Looks like we have one option missing. We use mostly PULSE / GATING and NOT aperiodically gating ?

br
Webmug

[Login to see usernames]

Ok Dankie, but to make bubbles and hang the cylinders in the cables, anyone can do that. After you have gotten the bubbles you want to go further. I have never made a video and do not even know how to do it, surely I will need to do it but first I want to experiment a bit more.

As you have the picture of how tyo hang the cell you can get a quick start. Otherwise just wait for the video, no stress.

Ok  Gauss I will be waiting on that video .

Once I am sure I will go full speed ahead .