Author Topic: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors  (Read 19406 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
  • Yes I got Jolted,
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #48 on: June 11, 2009, 20:46:32 pm »
Very cool...but I bet NOT ONE OF YOU HAD AN EEC!  ???
Quote
Of course we seen hv and capacitance and resonance
If you have seen this...then the electrical stress MUST be translated across the water gap too (EEC works here)...
And as for the proof you speak of...I myself would also love to see some of your replication of Naudin ;)  (if it's on the forum somewhere I would love for you to show me)

Here you are:
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,467.0.html

The EEC Electrojolt and i made was not involved in these tests.
Steve
Yes Steve and I worked on testing Naudin's Setup and we did replicate the same effect. The effect is: you have a semi-insulated cell, that gives you higher resistance, allowing to measure higher voltage across the electrodes, as current leaks from the insulation gaps, you see bubbles (electrolysis) and makes you think: Yehhhh I'm using voltage potential, Yehhhh, but then you measure how much gas it is making and compare that to straight DC and you realize that straight DC is more efficient. or Same power used in DC with more gas output.

But if most of you blind believers did some real testing you would know this by now.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #49 on: June 11, 2009, 20:58:12 pm »
No offense Steve...but, I read nothing of any resonance, you said you needed a bigger tube because your circuit couldn't reach 300Khz. I see no successful replication at all. Maybe you have talked to others that have...but, I would like to see proof.
Here's the difference Steve, I try and decipher a rather mysterious patent...I use my reading comprehension coupled with my knowledge of physics and electrical effects to hypothesize how it's operating. We know voltage potential is suppose to do work...we know that there is suppose to be IONIZED GAS....we know that AMPS ARE INHIBITED...I know how electricity REALLY works...and the "Poynting Flow" or voltage phenomena is the driving force, and that it's energy manipulates electrons and anti-electrons (Or whatever the counter flow is)....so I put the equation together and see it working in my mind....I offer MY OPINION!

You on the other hand are trying to tell us all "As a matter of fact" that it's a myth and that Naudin failed and it was just amps leaking...you say
Quote
Of course we seen hv and capacitance and resonance
, yet when you show your replication you have no such thing. So, I ask you...why do you speak from authority, saying "it's a myth...it's amp leakage making bubbles"?...when clearly you are skipping the whole basis of my interpretation!

If you make a perfect capacitor (even a good yet slightly leaky one)...just charging it will only create minimal gas...once charged YOU MUST RE-ROUTE THE CHARGE...disconnected from load so you don't create an energy sink that would draw more amps on the primary wire (this is the gating time of Meyer's system)...the charge is on the plates...AND ACROSS THE WATER/DIELECTRIC...you should read up on HOW to make ionized gas if you think my mode of operation is a "The Myth of Meyer"

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #50 on: June 11, 2009, 21:23:27 pm »
@Electro

Quote
But if most of you blind believers did some real testing you would know this by now.

I'm not even gonna school you dude...keep on thinking you know what you're doin :D
I will say however, that comment is some ignorant shit!
It amazes me how people think their "replication" failure is somehow everyone's failure...too funny

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #51 on: June 11, 2009, 22:10:16 pm »
We will see if there is something to Meyers and then I will move on to better things .

Stevie , you  havent read anything , you cant understand the patents or the language of the subtilities of such a science , and you just dont know enough about electronics or physics enough , in fact , you have went from one panacea copy to another ( we know how those end) .

Your assumptions are based on your results , wich are lacking for the reasons above .

Who ever said breaking multi-trilion dollar techologies would be easy .


« Last Edit: June 11, 2009, 22:25:44 pm by Dankie »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
  • Yes I got Jolted,
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #52 on: June 11, 2009, 23:19:09 pm »
@Electro

Quote
But if most of you blind believers did some real testing you would know this by now.

I'm not even gonna school you dude...keep on thinking you know what you're doin :D
I will say however, that comment is some ignorant shit!
It amazes me how people think their "replication" failure is somehow everyone's failure...too funny

I'm going to chose to ignore you for calling me ignorant for now.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #53 on: June 11, 2009, 23:47:03 pm »
Jolt ,

nevermind the comments of radiant_1 , he is young and emotional .


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #54 on: June 12, 2009, 00:43:24 am »
Quote
.I know how electricity REALLY works...and the "Poynting Flow" or voltage phenomena is the driving force, and that it's energy manipulates electrons and anti-electrons (Or whatever the counter flow is)....so I put the equation together and see it working in my mind....I offer MY OPINION!

@ radiant_1


i see it exactly the same way.. thanks for sharing the words "Poynting Flow" ... so tell me this radiant, would you say that we are copying natures natural driving force (eaths driving forces) ?... the primary is sending a signal that is driving a core and resembles the same flow of earths atmosphere's   energy flow that makes it possible to read a compass?   a compass acting like a wind vein in these forces of flow?    


while the chokes energy flow resembles wind flow/ and TRADE winds?   occuring in seperate chokes??  postive flowing toward the south while negtive electrons travel north at the same time on the POLARIZED core?

remember how hurricanes spins 180 out from each other dependant upon which side of the equator they are on...   think on hurricanes learn there flows and what causes them to occur.. try to enlighten your self with what create's  turbulance in TRADE..  turbulance flow in a circuit can cause destruction and heat.. timing even trades of opposite pressure will create balance..  what is it trading? pressure for vacuum or vacuum for pressure, its vice versa.. Bi directional flow of energy..  

now relate this to the trade we are speaking of.. it will hopefully widen your perspective.. i know it sounds confusing but it holds many truths that explain the path of G.O.D and the path to overunity i think.. (i would say you can relate it like this question = vacuum/ positive volts and answer equals pressure/ - volts)       

For every question there’s an answer, for every answer there’s a question there the same in relation but there are two differences involved to get action (GAIN) , distortion and clarity. When you are born, distortion of our reality is at its highest. Its simple times of life, the beginning... the mind is not full of mixed signals created from experience that happens in time... its blind. As we go through life we find clarity in many things and it gives us a sense of enlightenment and or a sense of troubles... distortions and clarity can create gain working in opposition to each other. The gain is wisdom and the truth. One step forward towards the question will in return, bring you one step closer to the truth. Hey it may be a bumpy road but its builds character. What shows the truth? Reflection. They make us walk in circles now days(alternating current), surrounded by nothing but distortion (turbulance). Some of us have intuition gods people (postive direction of flow)... some have ignorance (neutral) the devils infantry. There is so much truth in this .if you don’t understand it read it again and again (PRACTICE/ CYCLES). Since each time you read it, it shall bring you one step closer to clarity and one step away from distortion (GAINS), at the same relative time it will bring you one step closer to intuitive instincts and one step away from ignorance at the same time hey its duality vice versa (DUAL GAINS ) !! Life has too many variables and complexities to predict and prepare ahead of the time in most cases... so the only thing you can do is BE prepare for the ride 24/7... And in the present time of relativity it seems like it might get ruff. So hold on tight and don’t shit yourself.


 i cant believe why you cant type g.o.d. on this site without it bleeping it out you used to be able to..  i guess some people got upset with me talking about g.o.d. on this site? one day you might understand why stan related this tech to g.o.d aka voltage (the main  force that we know of driving our universe.... maybe one day people will stop fearing stuff that is said and getting offended and just take it for whats its worth to you. until then i guess fear and dis belief  is the main drive for suppresion..  such as bleeping out g.o.d. lol
 
« Last Edit: June 12, 2009, 00:58:48 am by outlawstc »

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Re: Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors
« Reply #55 on: June 12, 2009, 03:05:25 am »
@Dankie
Do not talk for me...do not excuse me...and do not attempt to minimize my words. I am only 24 but, have much life experience...I say what I mean and mean what I say.

@Jolt
I did not call you ignorant, I however, stand by my statement that what you said was ignorant because you have no idea (definition of ignorance)
I have no hard feelings, I just don't appreciate such patronizing assertions.