Meyers may have pulsed with 2 transistors

[Login to see usernames]

@Waytogo
Yes...electrolysis is "HOT" because electrons are being crammed into the water creating friction...which creates heat. Meyer's process doesn't allow electrons in....instead he "POTENTIALIZES" the water's electrons and then provides an energy "sink" for them. So it's cool because electrons are leaving!!!

[Login to see usernames]

I found this link at panaceauniversity.org:

http://www.powerlabs.org/flybackdriver.htm

I've seen patents of stan's where there's a center tap on the secondary with a diode and another coil perhaps where the pickup and feedback is taking place.

Regards,
Andy

[Login to see usernames]

@Waytogo
Yes...electrolysis is "HOT" because electrons are being crammed into the water creating friction...which creates heat. Meyer's process doesn't allow electrons in....instead he "POTENTIALIZES" the water's electrons and then provides an energy "sink" for them. So it's cool because electrons are leaving!!!

Well, thats the myth of Stan.........
My 10 tube cell stayd cool too when it ran on the alternator.

Steve

[Login to see usernames]

@Steve
It's no myth, and, is clearly laid out for all to read and understand...even Naudin notes the adiabatic flow of charge...see also adiabatic ionization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_ionization

[Login to see usernames]

Steve , stop being so negative in my threads .

Here is a cool video .

feature=channel_page

[Login to see usernames]

Steve , stop being so negative in my threads .

Here is a cool video .

feature=channel_page

Dankie, there is a difference between negative and realistic.
As long as nobody show otherwise, then maybe you must give it a thought that my advise, based on tests, is right.....
As what you concern, I didnt seen any test experience advice coming from your part.
You  sell wire and a PWM. No indication that you run a wfc or engine from your part.
I love thinking out of the box. Theory is nice. Now make the next step in the proces and that is make it practical, make it, prove it, tell everybody about it.
Some of us are doing that. You can name them all here. Thats why many came to this forum, because Brian and I showed the world what we where doing. Many followed. And i appriciate them all. They spend time and money, like i did/do.
I hope you start building a wfc......add the coil you like. If you can prove your right, then you will get it. No problemo.

Steve

[Login to see usernames]

@Steve
It's no myth, and, is clearly laid out for all to read and understand...even Naudin notes the adiabatic flow of charge...see also adiabatic ionization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_ionization

Hi radiant,

I had email contact with Naudin at the time that he published that wfc test.
He was convinced that he was right and that he wanted to go for a fully insulated tube.
As you can see at his video and drawing, he used tape to cover his tube.
I tried that too and it became clear to me that there where amps leaking.
That would also be the reason why he didnt publishe his promised new setup.
He should have found out what happend.
His theory is nice, btw. It would be great if someone was able to prove its working.

Steve

[Login to see usernames]

Here is a cool video .

feature=channel_page

nice video, btw