Recent Posts

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »
81
fastimports3 / Re: Has anyone played with using 3phase ESC for brushless motors???
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 29, 2021, 06:07:56 am »
Seems this set up is really touchy and only works with this wiring set up.
2 outside leads add a positive flowing to one and negative flowing to the other.
Center tap is neutral.
Hook up Cathode to center tube and
Anode to the water bath
(Near future I’m attaching a cylindrical piece of Titanium foil around the outside of the tubes to the water bath lead this will be oxygen collecting)
82
fastimports3 / Re: Has anyone played with using 3phase ESC for brushless motors???
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 29, 2021, 01:16:56 am »
Just purchased some good old KHCO3 and some titanium foil to experiment with. Going to try hooking it around inside around fuel cell where I have a lead going to just the water bath.
83
J. Miller / Stanley Meyer Art
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 29, 2021, 00:43:38 am »
thanks anon
kul pix
84
The fightingboard / Re: Plasma Ignition Dispute Energetic Forum calling out Aaron and Luc
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 28, 2021, 22:10:49 pm »
Just saw Steve’s posting above. Walter did use fuel. Ok… I have also wondered if you can replace with HHO and cause fracturing of the fog.

This is the Walter Jenkins video I watched where he talks about mixing water with fuel.
Walter Jenkins knew Stanley Meyer?
Is he helping where did he go?

85
General Discussion / Re: Right hand rule, please comment.
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 28, 2021, 13:23:14 pm »
I get all 3 fields from the right hand rule and relativity.

You can get magnetism, static electric field, and inductive field (EM wave field) from the right hand rule, it's a polarization of gravitational waves, the gravitational waves make up every elementary particle and produce interference and this is the polarization that is the magnetic field, from the magnetic field you can get all the other fields, I haven't bothered with weak force and nuclear force because these fields are still not detailed  but since there is a gravity field, magnetic field, electric field, electromagnetic wave field a.k.a induction explained with this a unified field theory is possible. Superluminal magnetic field is also possible and it present everyday but it cannot be measured, it is true that magnetic flux lines are imaginary but these are the most real at the same time as the other two field static electric field and inductive electric field depends only on the relative movement of particles but the polarization is the same. In this model every particle has two QM states which describe the gravitational wave from the schrodinger equation instead of probability waves. you just replace probability with energy, the problem is that particles are said to have one qm state not two qm states, it's like combining every damn section of physics together, I ain't getting no money to do it so this hasn't been utilized, I'm sure no one will understand what I'm talking about , this demands an enormous amount of visualization and I still haven't finished with the proofs for everything. Motherfuckers are getting paid to do phds for more useless shit, I can't even get funding for some chemicals I'm developing in this corrupt shithole country, this has nothing to do with free energy, there's no such thing as free energy, you can only convert between energy, you cant get 1 from 0! I only made this post because I've already posted some shit here about this but I was wrong about the Y component for the lorrentz contraction, it was really a simple mechanism which can only be realized when observing how the interference patterns move. You can however make an advanced magnetic bottle with this so yay fusion reactors! 

Imagine rotating dots on a circle, the dots are the polarization points, when a particle moves on the X axis because of relativity the dots on one side expand due to lorrentz tranformation and the dots on the other side contract, because the dots move to the top Y side the dots gain a Y component velocity, so there is a) rotation of the dots (STATIC ELECTRIC FIELD)  b)when the particle moves the dots expand so the polarization is either more intense or less intense on one side (MOTIONAL MAGNETIC FIELD) c) when the particle accelerates the dots keep contracting or expanding and the dots move to the Y sides there is a Y component velocity (EM waves/induction)  this relativistic effect  happens for every speed v of the particle small or big

The electron spin model is entirely correct, they say the electron cant spin at speed c because the field must exceed the speed of light c but this model is correct for the energy of the electron and the energy of the gravitational waves which comprise the electron, the flux lines are the polarizations of positive and negative components of gravitational waves , can exceed speed of light c but can never be measured in our universe. The flux line is the only thing that can move higher than speed c without violating any physics law! There are no static fields as the waves keep moving , we cannot measure them as outside observers so they are only static to us until the particles start moving, this is also a relativistic phenomenon, the matter is either condensed or expanded and other matter wants to either fill or remove itself from the region so it moves to cancel everything out and reach equilibrium, the moment the last elementary particle stops moving it will be the death of our universe.


Ampere correctly assumed the flux lines as the prime mover of all fields, the solutions for the paradoxes of electromagnetism are ill-conceived only to agree with the current fashion so uni teachers can keep their fat pockets filling with cash, it's corruption everywhere.

86
The fightingboard / Re: Plasma Ignition Dispute Energetic Forum calling out Aaron and Luc
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 28, 2021, 10:17:53 am »
5% petrol , waterfog, and a high voltage spark....

Thats almost everything on water.
I wonder if he just cannot make hho or H to replace the 5% petrol...
87
The fightingboard / Re: Plasma Ignition Dispute Energetic Forum calling out Aaron and Luc
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 28, 2021, 10:14:04 am »
Walter Jenkins car:


88
fastimports3 / Re: Has anyone played with using 3phase ESC for brushless motors???
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 28, 2021, 09:05:49 am »
Not sure about power consumption. Here is max power used so far.
11.1v Lipo battery and highest measurement of current 1.5amp

Also it does not just fire up you have to add so far absurd amounts of electrolytes so far I’ve tried KOH and Baking Soda. It’s all I have at the moment. My choice electrolyte is potassium bicarbonate but I do not have any right now.
I think the ESC needs caps and inductors to possibly tune it further. Still the cell produces fog off of it like fogger and changes torch flame just like fogger.

To control ESC I use a servo tester.
89
The fightingboard / Re: Plasma Ignition Dispute Energetic Forum calling out Aaron and Luc
« Last post by Login to see usernames on September 28, 2021, 08:53:33 am »
Who is Walter Jenkins????
He is suppose to be the  creator of the water fogged. He is supposed to have paired the fogger and plasma to have run a motor. I can’t find him, his site, and even though I suck making vids his channel was horrible. If I over stand what he did the he is also a fraud. He put gas in fogger til it would burn when atomized with water. That is not running your car on water. He suspended fuel particles giving the appearance he was running a car on water.
Check out this book I received while away.

I claim open source on the plasma ignition and fogger. I didn’t see anyone doing it when I started. Can anyone prove an earlier date of posting.

Doesn’t this bottom pic of Aquapulser look like my prototype?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »