Fake
"Please come prove us wrong! New video being shot today should help ease your fears young man. Don't get me wrong: it took 6 months and thousands of dollars to get to this point. Thanks to Stan Myers's video on tube tuning and comments from a fellow youtuber about the lower? voltage happiness factoid, and a few tweaks we found on our own, we produce over 30.8 LPM @ 55amps with the new prototype @ 3.02 volts. So please come to Az for a test drive"----
DoomTracker FutureEnergyConcepts (http://www.youtube.com/user/FutureEnergyConcepts)
So who wants to go to Arizona? If you're going to call the man a complete liar, at least take him up on his in person challange to prove him wrong. You have a trip to Arizona to lose, but you save the world if it's true. Time to put up or shut up. His offer is on the table. I don't see anyone from this site offering anything like this, ever. The talking part is already through...
anyone who uses 55 amps and Stan Meyer in the same sentence is full of *
For a bike we calculated about 1000amps 5000 volts 5XL5 MW of power for a bike? what do you want to do with that? The IGBT for 5MW will be huge
Nah Im sure you will not get there , your idea is too crazy and expensive now that you mention 5MW and platinum and tanks . You cant pull off this huge build , I know you will choke .
It has taken me over a year to finish this 3 phase oscillator + 6 channel amplifier , and I have spent 1000 hours and 1000$ , I have restarted 2 times the amplifier when seeing the problematic at hand and understanding what was happening . You dont even have the rest of the $ . I really dont think you can pull this off .
I wont send you 25$ after all , I have my own mosfets to buy anyways .
You should work on something simpler and cheaper and proven like Kapanadze , I dont like the idea of competing with the mother frikkin army and relying on a inventor wich is in it for big contracts .
We have to be adult with ourselves , this concept does not respect the concept of KISS and cheap , you couldnt get this kind of power from your street.
I think you should start asking if you are making good decisions and advancing yoiurself in life with these kind of projects .
sorry at least i tried.
:-X
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8&NR=1&feature=fvwp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8&NR=1&feature=fvwp)
The Meyer Demo cell would run any car, If mixed with gasoline fumes. I was running my dune buggy on Gasoline fumes and My plate cell. I wasn't interested in the Mix So I never really spoke much on it., However I have posted this info here over a year ago.
I assume this is what the video is about, If so that's very old news.
Its all scam.
700 watts on tubes with a 10v on all tubes in parallel do max 5 litres.....The parallel tubes can be compared with parallel resistors. The more you have, the lower the resistance, the more amps it pull....
steve
Its all scam.
700 watts on tubes with a 10v on all tubes in parallel do max 5 litres.....The parallel tubes can be compared with parallel resistors. The more you have, the lower the resistance, the more amps it pull....
steve
Yes, but they have 9-10 tubes, that can only pull about 4 to 6 amps in tap water.
well i already told you all that i got up to 20 amps at 1,44 volts using only one tube and naoh...
Its all scam.
700 watts on tubes with a 10v on all tubes in parallel do max 5 litres.....The parallel tubes can be compared with parallel resistors. The more you have, the lower the resistance, the more amps it pull....
steve
Its all scam.
700 watts on tubes with a 10v on all tubes in parallel do max 5 litres.....The parallel tubes can be compared with parallel resistors. The more you have, the lower the resistance, the more amps it pull....
steve
@Steve:
I can understand why you would say this, Steve. There have been thousands upon thousands of similar scams pulled on unsuspecting everyday people and experimenters alike in the past. They all sound too good to be true.
Even Stanley Meyer’s dune buggy seemed like a scam and was treated as one by the mainstream public throughout the world. By the time many of us realized that Meyer was not a scammer, it was too late and the man was dead. It’s very unfortunate that he died before we could learn in greater detail exactly what he had done. I would even go so far as to call it a tragedy. His technology could have saved so many lives that were wasted in the name of war over oil fields. We may not have even had the BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico if Stan had succeeded in making it to market with his devices.
It’s easy for people to develop thick skin when it comes to new energy technology in light of past letdowns. In the realm of psychology, this is known as “Pike Syndrome”.
Here is a video which will be able to visually explain just what this syndrome is for those who have never heard of it before:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyHCOPe8qy0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyHCOPe8qy0)
I am requesting more information regarding this Future Energy Concepts technology in order to see if they will allow me to replicate their setup. They claim in their video that the prototype version you see demonstrated in their video is going to be “shareware” (or freely copied sort of the way Pantone gives away a free GEET system plans so long as you don’t make more than one) and they are allowing the public to see their system in person on the 21st which is tomorrow.
I refuse to call their technology a scam until they refuse my request for exact schematics and component details.
Regards,
mina
If gasoline fumes were injected it would still get great mileage per hour and this would maybe explain the pressure of 20-60psi.
The unit sitting there started, really showed 5psi. But when motor started the pressure rose slowly to 60psi.
Also he mentioned HC maybe in the write up, whats he talking about? maybe Hydrogen Chloride???
Then why hide the information?
These guys have been up to this before.
I emailed a real easy question and still have no answer, but then again they may have stirred too much email up.
We'll see if if he keeps it shareware or open source.
Future Energy Concepts is moving forward to produce a commercial product. At the same time, they are giving away the plans for free to their prototype that powered the V-8 engine. The plans can be found at:second onehttp://groups.futureenergyconceptsinc.com/documentation/node/9
first onehttp://groups.futureenergyconceptsinc.com/documentation/node/46The following video is an example in real time (proof of concept) of how this system performs:third onehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaAAdeqSMFEThe above video was released by the same company that powered the 2004 Dodge eight cylinder pickup truck.
Yes its hard to believe that a small amount of gas can go so far.
I originally thought maybe he had just a liter per min.
But this is no ordinary hydroxy or BG.
I'm not absolutely sure but think he said 2H2O2i that came up in a conversation somewhere. But he is also working on Proto7, its completely different.
Anyways the strength in his HHO alignment has substancially more impact than the norm.
They call it ionized.
He pointed out just the rise of the tube over its pair creates an ionization. (1 tube taller than the other). A very good point.
Because of the ionization of the gases, they become heavy so this may easily relate to more density.
Put this gas in a balloon and if the balloon does not float and falls to the earth then this ionized gas can be compressed substancially beyond 60psi.
If the balloon floats its not the right gas and you cannot compress it too far before it implodes/explodes, its been suggested be carefull at 15psi.
I tried to tell you guys before that this is the real deal but I was butchered. I have been studying this HHO approach ever since which is why I had to temporarily abandon my own project here. It’s the bird in the hand reasoning/logic.
I am lacking certain details to complete my prototype “6” series replication which is why I can not offer or announce a successful replication at this time.
“...and the truth shall set you free.”
Most of the parts will be somewhere here and if there is anything else missing I could help and it would be good to speak about certain methods of build.
May I suggest its probably quicker and cheaper to make a basic test as Freddy did in one of the video's linked.
What I wrote about in the post that got lost was I stressed the tubes tuning. This is something that has been missed by us. There are mathematic computations in the design to make a cell-system work the way it should as Freddy is putting out in front of us as a gift.
This stuff is totally relateable to Meyer whether you see it or not.
The frequency of the tubes are selected not just on the chime/ring fundamentals but the harmonics. Some harmonics are actually more promenant than the fundamentals.
It was devised in such a fashion as to create the acousto-mechanical resonant effect.
Another strong point is the tubes are 180 degree's out of phase of each other, which aids in the vibrational effect.
So much work was put into the mathematics, included I believe the doppler effect among much more vibrational/sound computations.
Also pay attention to the carriage bolt in the center tube as its obvious this may slightly aid to the effect, somewhat as a slight deflection.
Seamless has the chime/ring to it thats needed to allow the signals/frequencys to propogate.
Testing pipes here seamless verses seamed and its a huge difference in acoustic quality.
The system won't work unless you pay attention to these details.
Seamless 316L 6"x1"x.035"wall.
Seamless 316L 7"x3/4"x.065"wall.
Carriage bolt for center of 3/4" tube has domed top.
Yes you would think that annealing may be a plus.I think Freddy himself says it’s necessary in the following video at 7:50:
I was told that it was not neccessary.
It is an added expense.
I was just informed that the rod holding the cell in the video of Freddy's test was also connected to a steel chair and was explained as funneling energy from the outside environment into the cell.@Komtek:
Also that another chemical was being used as a catalyst.
These informations and descriptions will become available in an upcoming PDF file from Freddy.
Either way I look at it it is apparent that there is some interesting reactions happening with Freddy's cell.
It appears that the full information disclosure will be available when the PDF is published.
This PDF will have a cost of $100 when its available.
I don't think it wise to perform a full replication build just yet.
Although testing of a single tube cell sounds interesting to see what result may be acheived.
What other catalyst in the bucket can produce his result?
What other catalyst in the bucket can produce his result?gasoline