Ionizationx: a clean environment is a human right!

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Steve on June 07, 2009, 12:42:37 pm

Title: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 07, 2009, 12:42:37 pm
Ever asked yourself: Plus on the inside or on the outside tube? Even Stan switched in his carrier from tubes...

In an electrolytic cell, the cathode is where the negative polarity is applied to drive the cell. Common results of reduction at the cathode are hydrogen gas or pure metal from metal ions. When discussing the relative reducing power of two redox agents, the couple for generating the more reducing species is said to be more "cathodic" with respect to the more easily reduced reagent.

In a galvanic cell, the cathode is where the positive pole is connected to allow the circuit to be completed: as the anode of the galvanic cell gives off electrons, they return from the circuit into the cell through the cathode.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathode

In physics or electronics, a cathode is an electrode that emits electrons into the device.


Steve
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 13, 2009, 21:49:01 pm
hi Steve

  yes in a galvanic cell, it is better to use the 'electron flow'
aussepom
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 02:17:00 am
Stan doesn't use a cathode then, neither emit electrons  ;)
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 09:10:41 am
can people stop trying to relate this to standard electronics and TRY  top relate it as 180 OUT //////////////////////////////ALSO WITH the logics and past RULES that have been set????can we start off with a clean slate with non existant  things that involve new IDEAS  ???? the unkonown that hasnt been read or said to main population stream???? lets really step out side the box AS A GROUP INSTEAD OF THE FEW because if we dont the only one who will suceeed  are the ones who care about politics and personal gains>? ant thats the truth




outlawstc
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 10:46:08 am
Cool article here .

http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17880329




Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 11:52:06 am
Stan doesn't use a cathode then, neither emit electrons  ;)

Hi Donald,

I know that there are 2 camps fighting to prove that they know what Stan did.. ;)
The non amps and the amps researchers.
Can you explain then to me the follow testresults?

Steve
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 14:05:57 pm
Amp restriction isn't non-amps.

The graph doesnt state if 12.5V is applied to the cell or to the transformer.

 :-\ 0 khz is steady DC
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 18:25:33 pm
i agree.
0khz = DC
Hahahahahahaha , good find!
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 14, 2009, 19:18:58 pm
The crowd that thinks Stan used high amps should read his patents and watch his videos, if that doesn't change their mind, nothing will.

When i said Stan doesn't use a cathode, because it doesn't emit electrons, i meant by purpose. If the system was perfect then zero electrons would be emitted, and therefore it wouldn't be a cathode by the above definition, the fact that there is electron leakage doesn't change the purpose of the system.
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 15, 2009, 13:59:08 pm
lol yeah, it is written in patent 4936961, somewhere else was written "the secondary _MAY_ include 2 chokes" - something like that.
if you're done with the jackhammer approach and/or believe meyer is invalid, try looking into avramenko plug and what frolov and stiffler said, it's a totally different and a more subtle approach to electrolysis.
I wonder what would happen if a primary of a transformer is placed on an avramenkoplug and the freq is tuned.
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 15, 2009, 14:55:56 pm
lol yeah, it is written in patent 4936961, somewhere else was written "the secondary _MAY_ include 2 chokes" - something like that.
if you're done with the jackhammer approach and/or believe meyer is invalid, try looking into avramenko plug and what frolov and stiffler said, it's a totally different and a more subtle approach to electrolysis.
I wonder what would happen if a primary of a transformer is placed on an avramenkoplug and the freq is tuned.

I am hoping and waiting for the day that i can put the jackhammer approach in the closet.
But nobody ever showed another way for HHO production. Lots of theory. As long as nobody showed 5 litres HHO / minute that is done not the jackhammer way, then that is the only realistic way.
Keep on trying to do it otherwise, Please! That is the holy Grail.

Steve
Title: Re: Kathode or Anode
Post by: Login to see usernames on June 15, 2009, 15:30:18 pm
If you know the efficiency, you can make as much liters as wished, efficiency of electrolysis is known and won't give surprising results when trying to reinvent it, how much l/h would nasa generate for their rockets ;
perhaps with pulsing it wont heat up so much - it won't give you more than faraday's limit of, what was it, 60 percents?

this is a demonstration of a different approach.
feature=channel_page
based on drstiffler's work, he is known for his practical approach and without too much theory.
i posted some articles captured to pdf, which are not available anymore on his site. the rapidshare link has expired, if you don't have the files anymore i'll fetch em from my other hdd. [e.zip]