KS, first:
Polarization effect occurs when voltage potential attracts oposite charges from the molecule,
and this way i disagree again with TGS, because ionization is at higher level and i believe that it was used only on gas processor and the water injector system.
KS this is what polarization is, by Meyer words:
(http://s19.postimg.org/kb9qqbo2b/polarization.png)
The L2 is amp inibithing effect
This is from Thech Brief PDF:
(http://s19.postimg.org/5imng0olv/8xa.png)
This is not LC RESONANT at resonant frequency, this is a "DC RESONANT CHARGING" :
http://www.richieburnett.co.uk/dcreschg.html
You really need to look up the word IONIZATION as this is describing that action perfectly.
Ionization is the process by which an atom or a molecule acquires a negative or positive charge by gaining or losing electrons to form ions, often in conjunction with other chemical changes.
a. the formation of ions as a result of a chemical reaction, high temperature, electrical discharge, particle collisions, or radiation
b. (as modifier): ionization temperature; ionization current.
Now what is not told in the books is the actual action of something when it gets ionized. Oxygen molecules get ionized and then let go of their bonds as a molecule and revert to lone oxygen gas atoms. These atoms are highly unstable and will go to stabilize with the oxygen molecules floating around in the air supply. All of these things already take place in nature all around us to include water molecules being broken down into hydrogen and oxygen gas atoms by way of ionization. These things I have already shown the world let alone the group.
You see I observe things very closely and ask and answer questions. I perform experiments I take much time in the observations of these experiments and I also look to nature to see if I can find these things taking place naturally. Find them I did but you don't seem to impressed by these wondrous findings. But I like the fact that you are listening to Ronnie and his team as we share a lot in common in how we view this technology. Our true difference is the formulas we choose to work with and that is it. We read we study we experiment and we try and understand the results as best we can. But one thing is clear, none of us can say a darn thing about Meyer's technology unless we reach 1kv or more per resonant cavity as not until it is reached do we have something to stand on concerning this technology. The first to reach these voltages will be the only one that can say Na or ya on this technology and they will be the first to see if Meyer was telling us the truth or not.
Now as for you Sebosfato I reject your claims of high voltage as you clearly didn't have the proper equipment to be able to see anything of what you were putting to your cell. I already went out of my way to prove you didn't do any such a thing with the crowdfunding campaign. You didn't have the tools necessary for the job at hand back then and you still don't have the needed tools to even take proper MMW measurements. I told you long ago of the problem with your false claims but you didn't head my warnings as you told us all that you surpassed Meyer's voltage 1kv per resonant cavity by close to 5 times as 50kv volts divided by 11 equals 4545 volts per resonant cavity. The problem with you is you tend to lie too much as you can't duplicate these false efforts of yours to this date and show them to us with a scope shot or video of you getting just 25kv to your cell which may I remind you is half of what you told us you had gotten to your cell. You have the tools to show 30kv being applied to your cell but to this date you have only shown us around 2.4kv if I remember correctly.
If you Sebosfato can remember what I talked about and analyzed those formulas you might be able to get this technology working as it is all there. I was very upfront with you and I won a bet in that I knew already that you would not open your ears to the truth about this technology from me as someone else thought you would. I will not repeat what I told you as for me that was your one chance to surpass me as my funds are very low and I have to wait very long times between experiments as that is truly my one big weakness for it forces me to move very slowly. I know what I am saying right now is very hard to hear let alone take but the truth is often the pill that is the most hardest to swallow. If you want to see a part of the formula I talked to you about then look up my writings on the Aetherforce site. I did what I could for you but like most that I talk to something freely given is treated like worthless trash.
Now about your question no, I don't think so, as the goal is to just place a high voltage potential difference on the water molecules trapped between the resonant cavities which is just the same thing that other guy, Eccles I believe, was doing. Remember, thunder storms do this, plants do this, and air ionizers do this all these things I have went over about the true science behind the patents I posted for all to learn from. As these resonant cavities are behaving like some very leaky capacitors in my point of view and are being used as resistors in the over all Voltage Intensifier Circuit. My goals wont change as I am so close to reaching them now, darn heat wave stopping me from getting things done right now as it is simply too hot for me to be working outside in the lab right now. But I will say this, if the math on paper shows to be correct then this will finally be it for me as I redesigned the needed changes into the VIC transformer based on further understanding of the formulas I am using.
