Author Topic: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work  (Read 15349 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2009, 20:35:14 pm »
the last few days i haven been going back and reading over everything

as far as the current limiting goes, first he tried using resistors, then then he moved over to chokes, like jolt says, the resistors make it less efficient, because resistors consume amps, but when you use a coil of wire (choke) you are using the electromagnetic field to restrict the amps

basic stuff i know, but stan says it all over the place, and it's important to wrap your head around...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2009, 20:57:13 pm »
So it seems there is a relation with amp flow . Kinesis , your observation is meaningless , it was brute force electrolysys but with less amps and higher voltage . So this is not it ... Your claim of voltage doing work .

More amps= more production

less amps = less production .


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2009, 00:36:06 am »
well then if that is the case then stan has another meaning for voltage performing work........i did it exactly as stated......

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/whatidid.jpg)


so if my experiment proves nothing then what is the purpose of this patent?....i did not come up with this.....i simply followed the steps.

and to electrojolt there will almost never be ZERO current flow in stan's system.....there will always be some electron leak.

BUT still stan achieved HIGH gas output with MINIMAL CURRENT.....so this does exist regardless of what you adn i have seen.....there is just something that we are still not doing right......and what better place to try and figure it out then from the beginning.

regardless IT HAS BEEN DONE.

and by using a resistor one can prove that by holding back electrons you can raise the voltage to a higher amplitude then before....this is the purpose of this post.

stan always talks about votlage amplitude and voltage potential.....this is the first patent where he posts his understandings.

ONCE AGAIN IF YOU HAVE NOT READ THIS PATENT PLEASE READ IT BEFORE YOU REPLY.

also notice that V13 is hte level where water disassociates......as stan and stephen have said many times.
(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/readthepatent.jpg)

VOTLAGE AMPLITUDE IS THE KEY.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2009, 00:45:16 am »
It never works like you think it does , never .

More voltage never = more production . And a 50kv gradient across cell doesnt do anything either .

I'm looking @ thus from a new perspective , I am interrested in knowing what is happening with the hutschison effect , how is that metal breaking apart and floating .




Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #12 on: April 21, 2009, 00:56:41 am »
honestly......you are a nut.

what i find INCREDIBLY interesting is how positive voltage potential and negative electrical potential are 2 seperate things on the graph.

i will think on this more.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
  • Yes I got Jolted,
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #13 on: April 21, 2009, 01:05:33 am »

what i find INCREDIBLY interesting is how positive voltage potential and negative electrical potential are 2 seperate things on the graph.

i will think on this more.

I agree, if Stan's stuff really worked, then there is something missing. It is useless to try to increase voltage potential across the cell, that just does not work.
We need to think how can we make the H to O bond weaker. maybe combining RF with DC pulsing?



Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #14 on: April 21, 2009, 01:49:30 am »
honestly......you are a nut.

what i find INCREDIBLY interesting is how positive voltage potential and negative electrical potential are 2 seperate things on the graph.

i will think on this more.

The only thing thats different is their direction , they are bidirectionnal .


Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Voltage Potentials Ability to Perform Work
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2009, 02:22:10 am »
listen up this is what im seeing tell me what you think..  imagine with the unipolar set up.. stan says the water acts like a resistor.. does he mean from earth ground?   if you hook positive stainless choke to secondary with the diode.. then hook the negative choke to the cell and to the negative side of the vic PRIMARY.. then put the the 50% duty cycle pulse frequency gate right after hooking negative choke to pri neg.. with a analog pulse going in at  the same 50% duty as the pulse gate.. wouldnt the fuel cell act like a gate itself?  stan says the negative choke superimposes its charge onto primarys opposite end. so think of current being there and if you left the door open it will trip the breaker but stan has the 50 percent duty gate and the 50 percent duty frequency... hes not allowing it to get the chance to build current he keeps closing the door before it has a chance.. but its allowing a gated dwell time in the cell which he also uses to tune into waters resonance.