Author Topic: unipolar pulse trains  (Read 77029 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #280 on: April 13, 2009, 21:16:06 pm »
to hydrogen mask and stevie......

it seems that he also uses a gating circuit in the same way.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/gated.jpg)

but the weird thing is with this circuit is that i am unsure of how the resonant charging chokes will act in this manner.....since there is no second pulse to be created.

Online Login to see usernames

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4461
    • water structure and science
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #281 on: April 13, 2009, 21:41:12 pm »
Hi Kinesis,

Those 2 schematics are the only 2 real schematics of Stan, in my eyes.... They are very realistic.
Not sure how much production it would deliver, but if i remember well, Puharich did almost 100% Faraday. Puharich used KOH.

I did this evening a re-run of the experiments of 2 years ago. Now with 2 years more experience, nothing new came out.
I used a variac. Followed by a bridge rectifier. A switching FET on a 50% duty cycle. A diode and a Bifilair coil and 1 tubeset of 3 inches.

I seen again the AM look like signal on my scope. I playd with voltage levels and frequency's.
I proved again that the bifcoil limits current. I seen very high spike of hundreds of volts across the tube.
Sofar nothing....

I limite amps till 0.15amps. Voltage base from 12 till 75volts in test. Spikes of hundreds of volts.
NOTHING special in production.

If you have that double pulse and if you can deliver that into a tube or platecell, then you might be very efficient.
But please do always the strait DC test in watts to compare results.

br
Steve




Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #282 on: April 14, 2009, 00:23:29 am »
that schematic figure 7 is for the gas resonant cavity.

hmmm i am still working on this voltage amplitude.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #283 on: May 04, 2009, 23:08:08 pm »
i have tried the other 2 bifilar windings one with orientation N to S to Cell and the other orientation S to N to cell with no success.

i am considering that there may have been a mistake in the direction of the windings in the secondary of john's coil......right hand rule  ;)

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #284 on: May 05, 2009, 08:35:45 am »
so come to find out the magnetic field orientation was not connnected correctly in the coil......this may have been the problem for many things......will test tomorrow.

see here

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #285 on: September 17, 2010, 21:18:08 pm »
coming back to life


a way to apply unipolar pulses is have a transformer pulsed by a mosfet than rectify its output with full wave bridge rectifier... than feed to the next transformer...

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #286 on: September 17, 2010, 23:29:34 pm »
its aliveee its aliveee lol

nice way of putting seb

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3607
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #287 on: September 22, 2010, 22:03:49 pm »


or




$ 1 5.0E-6 0.27182818284590454 39 5.0 43
c 384 208 384 368 0 1.0E-8 50.192365082338185
w 256 208 256 368 0
v 128 96 128 208 0 1 800.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
w 176 208 128 208 0
r 336 208 336 368 0 10000.0
w 336 368 384 368 0
w 336 368 256 368 0
w 336 208 384 208 0
w 304 96 384 96 0
w 384 192 384 208 0
169 176 96 256 96 0 0.01 10.0 -0.37549774322331675 5.898059818321144E-17
d 256 160 384 96 1 0.805904783
w 256 128 256 208 0
w 176 160 176 208 0
w 128 96 176 96 0
d 256 96 304 96 1 0.805904783
T 416 96 480 192 0 1.0E-4 1.0 0.003908857085979323 -3.5822762511865803E-22
w 384 96 416 96 0
w 384 192 416 192 0
d 384 368 512 240 1 0.805904783
w 480 96 512 96 0
w 512 96 512 240 0
w 480 192 480 208 0
w 480 208 384 208 0
o 0 2 0 35 80.0 0.0125 0 -1




or this


$ 1 5.0E-6 0.42987889063095264 58 5.0 43
w 144 128 192 128 0
T 192 128 272 240 0 0.0010 30.0 -0.33022461378201595 -2.42861286636753E-17
T 400 128 496 240 0 2.5E-4 1.0 -3.555489236362064E-14 3.5712210098848285E-14
c 400 240 400 400 0 5.0E-8 193.6205233702931
w 272 240 272 400 0
w 496 400 400 400 0
v 144 128 144 240 0 1 1000.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
w 192 240 144 240 0
w 320 128 400 128 0
w 496 240 496 400 0
w 496 128 496 64 0
d 496 64 400 64 1 0.805904783
d 272 128 320 128 1 0.805904783
r 352 240 352 400 0 10000.0
w 352 400 400 400 0
w 352 400 272 400 0
w 352 240 400 240 0
w 400 64 400 240 0
o 3 2 0 35 640.0 0.4 0 -1




Note that if the rate of capacitance to resistance change, the effect disappear. .