Author Topic: unipolar pulse trains  (Read 77284 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #240 on: April 13, 2009, 00:16:44 am »
well dankie the way johns coil is made craetes unipolar pulses......the way you SAY IT SHOULD be connected is completely wrong and just produces another square wave but with a higher amplitude.

stan's actually doubles the pulse on the off pulses when the magnetic field collapses.....boy have you ever play with an inductor before?

you are wrong wrong wrong.

you show me a 50 percent duty cycle pulse that turns into a unipolar double pulse with an inductor and a single diode.....please.

regardless of your skewed logic the evidence shows that tesla, meyers, crux, aaron m, and john's windings are correct.

they are correct simple as that.

you are completely wrong.....clear your head and try again later.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 121
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #241 on: April 13, 2009, 00:25:58 am »
Troy,
Thank you so much for testing this coil the way you are.  Seeing the signal on your scope makes me think we have hit a small breakthrough in this project.  I think we have alot more to do but we are surely headed in the right direction.  Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.  John

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #242 on: April 13, 2009, 00:34:15 am »
i deleted my last post because it was pointless. it will just cause more bickering which is somthin i dont want. it just upsets me to see anger on a thread. and no manners.. bu were only human as well right?

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #243 on: April 13, 2009, 00:39:18 am »
yes john this is a break through.....the unipolar pulses are finally solved.....

and it works exactly as stan states.
(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/yesnoshit.jpg)

we will work out every knook and cranny until it works exactly as he states......

this is amazing.....this used to plague me forever......i am familiar with resonance and step charging very well from past experiences......i can do this now.....i just need a real signal amplifier.....one that amplifies the amplitude and not just the power or force in the signal.....a mosfet is good for power.....but does nothing to step up voltage amplitude......remeber voltage amplitude is completely seperate from resoanance.....so you can adjust it higher or lower and you will get more or less gas bubbles while maintaining resonance......this is it.....i just need to get a power amplifier tomorrow.

so cross your fingers.

this could be it.

and if it is......this shit needs to go global......a pdf file should start to be created for how to construct the vic coil......

if i do get it with my function generator and power amplifier then afterwards we can design a working signal generator......not a pulse width modulator......a real controlable circuit.......

i hope electrojolt reads this.

and i read your post outlawstc before you deleted it......this section is under projects section.....it is for my developements and my track record.....you and dankie start going off on theories...and hold your own conversation completely off topic from this thread......that was my point.....i appreciate thinking......but there are places for that.....your own projects section or a completely new thread.....i want this thread to be the entire process it took for me to get to the damn unipolar pulses.....and finally this thread is completed.


AND STEVIE WHAT WAS THE RESULT WITH THAT CIRCUIT YOU CREATED?......IS IT JUST USED TO CREATE THE GATING EFFECT.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #244 on: April 13, 2009, 00:45:30 am »
That scopeshot you show is no way doubled , the inner/winding capacitance is simply opposing the voltage drop ... In no way is this a doubled frequency , it shows nothing significant whatsoever .

The John connection and my connection work in total opposite way , that specific connection by John is never *physically* shown , all you have to base yourself on is the dots ... Well your connection leaves out MY connection , the bifilar shown by Meyers will never be like the John VIC coil since they have totally different effects on water ...

What I am saying is that the coil shown in the independant report and tech brienf and the John VIC will never be even remotly similar in the way they operate ... its not 1= another ... they will never be = ...

There is a contradiction here . But plz , this is not a debate wich is troublesome , this will be decided by what works since its just a simple matter of switching connections .






Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #245 on: April 13, 2009, 00:59:13 am »
Quote
i want this thread to be the entire process it took for me to get to the damn unipolar pulses..
.  dude you are the type of person that gets me in trouble...  its like that last word thing .. its got to be snotty.. like a 1 up.. the one word damn turns your whole paragraph negative in my mind. the tampon between the leg theory..  and to be so mad to use gods name invane.. to show your anger?   im sure stan wouldn't care for that anger towards the lord. in the production of one of gods greatest gifts.

Quote
stan's actually doubles the pulse on the off pulses when the magnetic field collapses.....boy have you ever play with an inductor before?

you are wrong wrong wrong.

you have around 4 days now playing with the vic and you say you know how it works and wrong wrong wrong.. boy have you ever played with a inductor before??? dankie has been very helpful and yet you degrade him?  wake up man settle down.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #246 on: April 13, 2009, 01:05:19 am »
i have tried dankies connection.

i have tried john's connection.

dankies did not work.

johns worked.

dankies did not create a double pulse

john's did.

dankie tells me it's still wrong.

when i am the one actually working on it here.

yes dankie has done alot.

but he is wrong in this case.

he can talk all he wants until i see him prove me wrong.

and never once was i angry.

too many assumptions are made here.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: unipolar pulse trains
« Reply #247 on: April 13, 2009, 01:06:53 am »
i have tried dankies connection.

i have tried john's connection.

dankies did not work.

johns worked.

dankies did not create a double pulse

john's did.

dankie tells me it's still wrong.

when i am the one actually working on it here.

yes dankie has done alot.

but he is wrong in this case.

he can talk all he wants until i see him prove me wrong.

and never once was i angry.

too many assumptions are made here.

Somehow it always comes back to this debate , I wonder if its just not both ... (plz ignore this now and keep as a reminder)