Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 22, 2021, 21:16:53 pm »
Just saving everyone's time and frustration.

Andrija Puharich talks about resonance to be the most current with the less power applied, Meyer talks the opposite with almost same circuit (inductors and transformer) with exception of the diode.

Everyone who think by their own head will question all of this.
with serie resonance, thats what it is. Current and also voltage. out of phase......The voltage creates the "pressure" and then the current can boost in. That how you get lots of current going thru a wfc...

now the question is: how high can you go with voltage to charge up a bifilar coil? What are the upper borders?
Of course it depends on the amount of windings and wire resistance, but still...
Lets say, we take a ferriet core with 400 bif windings...
How high can you go with volts?
2
J. Miller / Stanley A Meyer EPG Modification to Improve Ferro Fluid Velocity
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 22, 2021, 16:03:52 pm »
Mechanical Pump EPG

If one closely examines the images of the Mechanical Drive EPG, it is seen that the copper pipe is spiraled  3 and 1/4 loops
This is a result of the input and output openings being at right angles to each other on the B500 Little Giant pump.
To connect the pump to the spiraled pipe, two 90 degree elbow fittings are used. as well as a reducing coupler.
 
A useful reference to consider for many engineering problems is  The Engineering Toolbox.
link  https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com

A suggestion to eliminate the 90 angles was suggested at one of the Bremen Conferences. (2019)

The Engineering Toolbox site has a chart showing the effect on flow vs. type of fitting or coupling and the equivalent length of pipe

It seems to indicate that the use of 2 very gradual 90  degree  fittings  (ie. large radius) might improve flow by reducing turbulence caused by a sharp 90 degree elbow fitting.

link is--   https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/equivalent-length-copper-pipe-fittings-d_1670.html

A 90 degree elbow is equivalent to adding  12 inches of pipe
A 45 degree elbow is equivalent to adding 6 inches of pipe


Thus by removing the 90 degree elbow after the alignment coil and instead continuing
with a curve of the tubing with a bend of 5 cm, turbulence and rheological flow
impediments are reduced by about 2%

Likewise the elimination of the 90 degree elbow from the spiraled core to the input to the
mechanical pump is also reducing the equivalent pipe length by another 2% .
Since the length of tubing in the mechanical  drive EPG is approximately 51 feet, this would be a reduction in effective length of 2 feet or about 4%


So in summary, the suggestion to eliminate two 90 angled connectors appears to be a good one, with about a 4% reduction in
turbulence and resistance to flow of liquids 
   `
3
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 22, 2021, 14:36:50 pm »
Just saving everyone's time and frustration.

Andrija Puharich talks about resonance to be the most current with the less power applied, Meyer talks the opposite with almost same circuit (inductors and transformer) with exception of the diode.

Everyone who think by their own head will question all of this.
4
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 21, 2021, 17:23:25 pm »
its just a very leaky capacitor.....
5
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 21, 2021, 17:22:50 pm »
Nobody has to follow a patent in order to make something to work.

It is more than proved that there is nothing true about that in the patent.
Some can argue back and forth but in the end there is no sucessfull replication of this work, not in the condiitons mentioned in the patents.

The only way to do this is start from the earlier work and try to find out how to improve that.

Forget miracle claims of no amps, it will consume power whatever you like it or not.
The difference is there will not be a chemical reaction, there will be no additives to the water and there will not be any reaction with the electrodes, chemically.
Patent figures was just exagerated to be distinct from electrolysis and grant the patent.
And there is no f*cking capacitor WFC, just a non linear resistor.

that came out of your hart  ;D
6
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 20, 2021, 18:29:22 pm »
Nobody has to follow a patent in order to make something to work.

It is more than proved that there is nothing true about that in the patent.
Some can argue back and forth but in the end there is no sucessfull replication of this work, not in the condiitons mentioned in the patents.

The only way to do this is start from the earlier work and try to find out how to improve that.

Forget miracle claims of no amps, it will consume power whatever you like it or not.
The difference is there will not be a chemical reaction, there will be no additives to the water and there will not be any reaction with the electrodes, chemically.
Patent figures was just exagerated to be distinct from electrolysis and grant the patent.
And there is no f*cking capacitor WFC, just a non linear resistor.
7
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 20, 2021, 17:08:43 pm »
If you do a patent search on the us patent office, and wait like 20 SpongeBob years, you will get access to 2 patents where Stan used additives.
and why did you not post them here?

Would have helped.....

cheers
8
General Discussion / Re: Stan Meyer Patent search....U.S. Ser. No. 302,807
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 20, 2021, 12:35:05 pm »
If you do a patent search on the us patent office, and wait like 20 SpongeBob years, you will get access to 2 patents where Stan used additives.
9
General Discussion / Re: I think that Overunity is possible....after all these years of searching
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 16, 2021, 10:10:22 am »
Overunity

When  a solar cell is irradiated with sunlight, we can measure the amount of  watts generated
and  the efficiency.   If we measure the amount of light absorbed, the increase in temperature
the amount of electricity produced etc. ,we can determine its efficiency which is about 20%

When we talk about over unity devices,  a similar comparison may be occurring.
We theorize about the  source of this extra energy but we are not really sure of its origin.
Is the device tuning into the  energy of  neutrinos  or dark matter vibrations, quantum
vibrations or charges, or some other undiscovered source and converting it into electricity.

I think if we imagine the universe  as a box with everything contained within it
by definition  all the energy is equal to the mass and  square of the velocity of its expansion


Thank you, Jim.
I think that there are options to channel some of the energy towards certain systems, like the AC power that we are using.
We use magnets, wind or water or nuclear power togehter.
Meyer , Horvath and Anderson used the power of neutron accelerators in a waterbath to add neutrons to hydrogen atoms in a certan way that the outcome of energy was higher then the proces of creation took.

I am following the magnet motor , the muller dynamo etc etc systems for years. I even build one 8 years ago.
But after doing some study of people who studied Leeds Kalnin i figured some things out.
I ordered some parts. The setup is crazy simple. No Lenz law troubles.
You see, as soon as you are confronted with the LAWS of physics then you can forget it. No OU.
But as soon as you find a way around these laws, the world opens towards OU.
I am convinced that some other inventors already figured out work arounds for certain law of physics.
Laws of physics are just a description of fenomenons from nature.


cheers!
10
General Discussion / Re: I think that Overunity is possible....after all these years of searching
« Last post by Login to see usernames on November 15, 2021, 19:38:40 pm »
Overunity

When  a solar cell is irradiated with sunlight, we can measure the amount of  watts generated
and  the efficiency.   If we measure the amount of light absorbed, the increase in temperature
the amount of electricity produced etc. ,we can determine its efficiency which is about 20%

When we talk about over unity devices,  a similar comparison may be occurring.
We theorize about the  source of this extra energy but we are not really sure of its origin.
Is the device tuning into the  energy of  neutrinos  or dark matter vibrations, quantum
vibrations or charges, or some other undiscovered source and converting it into electricity.

I think if we imagine the universe  as a box with everything contained within it
by definition  all the energy is equal to the mass and  square of the velocity of its expansion


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10