Author Topic: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR  (Read 13738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #32 on: May 23, 2009, 04:27:15 am »
I dont understand Burntwire , did you have any problems  ???

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #33 on: May 24, 2009, 02:00:19 am »
I dont understand Burntwire , did you have any problems  ???
No problem at all yet. Save my general confusion on this topic.  I’ve read so much on proper coil winding I’m not sure which to do.  So when someone smokes one I want to understand what their doing and try to avoid costly mistakes. 
I’m attempting this on seprate cores with the torridal step up.  Why you may ask?  I’ve just had no luck finding a CRGO core of suficent size to fit everything.  I did find a few ferite cores which work however their terrible in terms of HENRY improvement.  Both the ferrite and air cores were pretty much worthless for producing a large H.  Using the same bobbin with 300 turns per gap (pic 4) of my bifilar yeilded the following Henry readings
AIR
0.076 H leg 1
0.075 H leg 2
Ferrite
   0.152 H leg 1
   0.150 H leg 2
CRGO
   2.954 H leg 1
   2.933 H leg 1

Now the interesting finding the
Check out the following signal pictures.
Input Voltage 12Volts
Freq. 4.9 KHz

Pic1
Bifilar hooked up with full lenght of both legs

Result:   Normal frequency double and some voltage gain
60Volts p2p with 1.94 A on primary

Pic 2 (Tap2)

Bifilar hooked up with full length of leg one (as Stan shows) and leg two exiting on the last tap of the second leg.  Effectively shortens the second coil by 600 turns.

Result:    
Weird frequency Massive first Voltage spike
2nd and 3rd Pulse much smaller
622 Volts p2p with 0.49 A on Primary
Voltage gain is great in terms of peak to peak differental however I’m not getting the steping yet with hooked up to the WFC.  Readings are fairly stable at 1kv

Pic 3 (Tap 1)
Bifilar hooked up with full length of leg one (as Stan shows) and leg two exiting on the second to last tap of the second leg.  Effectively shortens the second coil by 300 turns.

Results:
Weird frequency another Massive first Voltage spike then a bunch of little spikes until the next pulse

578 Volts p2p with 0.32 A on Primary



Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2010, 15:00:40 pm »
no i am not an electrical engineer

but i understand power = amperage x voltage

seems everyone is having problems with your wire when it is wound bifilar.

let's see his "success" then.

as of now your wire cannot be wound in a working bifilar manner until proven.

so how about you ask him to show his "success."

also regardless. YOUR COATING IS NOT ML HEAVY BUILD AND FROM JOHN'S COMPARISON STAN'S COATED WIRE HAS A COATING OF ABOUT 10 TIMES GREATER STRENGTH.

so how about some people step up to the line.

i am sick of theory this and theory that.

your wire HAS TO BE wound in seperate cavities.......it cannot be wound bifilar.

and figure 6-1 IS WOUND BIFILAR.

This fckin poussy had it working right , he mentionned square waves once on the secondary but I cant find the post anymore .

He and John ruined my project and robbed me of my Bobbins and wire .

These little amateurs robbed me .

I told them from the beginning to wind each coils in a seperate section and explained why that was logical , never did they listen to me , they were was a a sophist little saboteur , John never sent my VIC for me to test and did not understand basic electronics , Kinesis was even worst , couldnt make a pulsing circuit work right .

He shafted me and never came up with my VIC .

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2010, 05:36:38 am »
you suffer from mental problems.

i have not heard from bostick either.

i feel i got my moneys worth from using johns coil.

i never got my coil back either, i got 5 uses total with 2 different coils.

your wire was junk and it seems now you are stuck with it and are trying to say we lied so you can sell some more.

tisk tisk.  a full year and you have still not grown up.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #36 on: March 01, 2010, 18:35:14 pm »
Troy

 Did you did you get a VIC operational, with gas production?

I should thank you again for giving me those stainless steel tubes, you can see what made with them in the RVIC topic.

Thanks.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #37 on: March 01, 2010, 20:39:53 pm »
my only problem was trying to figure out how to push power through my setup.

i can get all the waves forms, but not at the required voltage amplitude.

i have since put on hold my efforts until more information arises.

Offline Login to see usernames

  • 50+
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #38 on: March 02, 2010, 01:02:28 am »
Ask Komtek how long he had his stainless choke , still using it and no break .

You broke it cause you wound it wrong and wire it close together , not like I told you .

What you made is maximised voltage between turns and maximised the capacitance between wires .

Learn about basic numbers and electronics and listen to what I say tne come back complaining about my wire , Komtek and Hardkrome still use to this day and never had any problems with it .




Offline Login to see usernames

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 235
Re: UNIPOLAR means UNIPOLAR
« Reply #39 on: March 02, 2010, 02:38:38 am »
I shorted one of my chokes.
But it was all my doing from messing with it physically and having the SS bifilar wire both coming out the same hole, shorted at the point where they come out of the bobbin. Tried to dig it out, still think I can but I don't care because I got a couple more of them.
Have played with it and its all good as long as you don't over-screw it ::), meaning a person could pulse wrong and have wrong loads on it that could cause an incorrect current draw into the transformer.
I still have not made anything for this transformer yet.
Although I did play with only a single isolated small tubeset, but after a while I really thought it was designed for another part in the system and not a tube-set. Did make some tiny bubblidge with it.
Besides that at the time I didn't even have a decent pulser setup.

Don't know what else I can tell you.
Never heard any problems from HardChrome either don't think he had any.
I'm also holding on to find out if these transformers were made for another part of the system.
Thinking pretty soon I'll set-up a ionizer its been on my mind for sometime now and seeing some of the simple methods has helped me decide.
Thanks to Bubz and Steve for that.
I'll try these transformers in an ionization experiment, for some reason I think they were designed for another HV device not a tube-set but air-gas processor sounds good or injector electrodes.