Stanley Meyer > Stan Meyers system 1

EEC theory

<< < (2/2)

Donald and Andy,

I do not suggest that electrons travel through a liquid, however, there is a part of the liquid who in in contact with the electrodes.

Accoording to the Helmholtz double layer theory there is no electron exchange at all.

The electrical double layer
The model which gave rise to the term 'electrical double layer' was first put forward in the 1850's by Helmholtz. In this model he assumed that no electron transfer reactions occur at the electrode and the solution is composed only of electrolyte. The interactions between the ions in solution and the electrode surface were asssumed to be electrostatic in nature and resulted from the fact that the electrode holds a charge density (qm)which arises from either an excess or deficiency of electrons at the electrode surface. In order for the interface to remain neutral the charge held on the electrode is balanced by the redistribution of ions close to the electrode surface.

The attracted ions are assumed to approach the electrode surface and form a layer balancing the electrode charge, the distance of approach is assumed to be limited to the radius of the ion and a single sphere of solvation round each ion. The overall result is two layers of charge (the double layer) and a potential drop which is confined to only this region (termed the outer Helmholtz Plane, OHP) in solution. The result is absolutely analogous to an electrical capacitor which has two plates of charge separated by some distance (d)

with the potential drop occurring in a linear manner between the two plates. It is perhaps no surprise that when impedance analysis is performed on electrochemical systems the response due to the electrolyte redistribution is modelled in terms of capacitative elements.
The model of Helmholtz while providing a basis for rationalising the behaviour of this region does not account for many factors such as, diffusion/mixing in solution, the possibility of absorption on to the surface and the interaction between solvent dipole moments and the electrode. A later model put forward by Stern begins to address some of these limitations

now the ions are assumed to be able to move in solution and so the electrostatic interactions are in competition with Brownian motion. The result is still a region close to the electrode surface (100x10-10 m) containing an excess of one type of ion but now the potential drop occurs over the region called the diffuse layer.
Many modifications and improvements have been made to these early models with the latest approaches using numerical modelling to follow the redistribution effects as the electrode potential is varied.

The issue is that if you read about Helmholtz layers and the fact that Puharich also refers to Helmholtz, that Stan Meyer theory on the EEC at least is not applicable towards the "electrolysis" proces.
Maybe EEC is only possible with gasses.


Hi Steve,

I think I said that EEC has to do with gases.  The patents and TB differ in describing the EEC but they talk about a grid above the water in contact with the gases and methods of discharging the charge built up on the grid.  How the electrostatic filter is hooked up isn't very clear but it may be part of the EEC.  Kelvin generator doesn't need an external pulsing circuit to light a neon bulb or produce a spark.  Parts of the patents describe the hydrogen ion being part of the EEC taking a negative charge from the positive oxygen ions.  H2- is found in outer space so it's not an imaginary thing.  The question in my mind is how stable are all these ions until they're ignited.  If some electrons are discharged into the water then that would shift the auto-ionization of the water and its pH without adding chemical electrolyte.  Anyway that's my take on it.


of course it wont work with electrolyte, and electrolysis, this is the forum "Stanley Meyer non electrolysis waterfuel systems"

--- Quote from: Dynodon on January 20, 2010, 05:04:18 am ---None of this stuff is posible unless we get the Meyer effect first.Get that figured out first,than the rest of this stuff will fall into place.Other wise were just wasteing time.It won't work without high voltage across the tubes.

--- End quote ---

How many people has stored a fine coil, A TV coil for example on a shelf?

How man people has went to pick the coil up when stored on the shelf and got an alternating Jolt. Are you aware that Such coils can self charge on the shelf and start to resonate with the ambient air becomming a capacitor?

It does not feel to pretty when one bites you right off the shelf, Its abnormal but it does happen, I even had it happen to me more than once.

The point is, coils resonates with no circuit surrounding them, And yet the right coil has not been placed in the right circuit, Not to mention it has been proved that voltage can rise over water while current flow is not allowed, We have found the trick of limiting current to 0 to be in the Core.


[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version