Stanley Meyer > Stan Meyers demo cell system

Error in Stans Gas production

<< < (2/14) > >>

dudleyengineering:
icould see being off a few a few hundred cc but a few liter is hard to mistake the error are so significant stan had to know he was not being truthfull

sebosfato:
Psi is pounds per square inch that is different from BArs or atmospheres. If in one minute a space of 1 liter is compressed to 10 bar(145psi) you will have produced 9 liters of gas in one minute. Because the space was not in vacuum. 

psi x 0.068948 = bar;        1 Psi = 0,06 bar

 bar x 14.50368 = psi.      1 bar = 14,5 psi



itzon:

--- Quote from: Dynodon on January 15, 2010, 17:11:33 pm ---I have been meaning to put this down,but keep forgetting with everything else going on.
Warp pointed this out a while back and I felt the same way and suggested a simple test.
Stan states that he was producing 7 psi a minute.And that for every one psi he gets one litre of gas in a one litre cavity space.
Wrong!!!
My friend and I did a test.We pressurized a one litre cavity to 15 psi,knowing that atmoshere pressure is 14.7.Then the pressurized one litre cavity was released into an inverted bottle water test.
It only filled the bottle once exactly.
So to make one litre a minute with a cavity of one litre volume,you will need to pressurize it to 14.5 psi.
So what does this mean?
Stan's demo cell was only producing @ 500 cc per minute!!!

This changes alot! But it still works out better than faraday,but not by much.We calculated 104% efficientcy.

Don

--- End quote ---

I don't recall where Stan said this(I'm not saying he didn't, I just don't remember where I heard or seen it).  Was it on one of the videos or tech brief or ...

Was it clearly stated that the cell was completely sealed while producing that amount of gas, or was that while supplying gas?

sebosfato:
I also never saw such statement.

Dankie:

--- Quote from: dudleyengineering on January 15, 2010, 22:22:56 pm ---icould see being off a few a few hundred cc but a few liter is hard to mistake the error are so significant stan had to know he was not being truthfull

--- End quote ---

True , who made that report ?

Before I even continue wasting my time , I must know who is Stephen Chambers .

I cannot believe Stan was a fraud , if he was they did a better job with him than with 9/11 .

Dynodon , do you know people who witnessed the dead inanimate body of Stan Meyers @ his funeral ?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version