### Author Topic: My new approach  (Read 6703 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

#### Hidden

• Moderator
• Sr. member
• Posts: 457
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2009, 15:17:13 pm »
even if it was like that, stanley does not have a parallel resonant circuit but a series circuit.
how should there be any current "recirculating" (as you call it)?

or is the bifilar coil your parallel lc-circuit?
« Last Edit: November 20, 2009, 15:36:33 pm by haithar »

#### Hidden

• Moderator
• Sr. member
• Posts: 457
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2009, 16:59:10 pm »
sebosfato, can you elaborate about the parallel circuit in a stanley meyers setup?

#### Hidden

• Global Moderator
• Hero member
• Posts: 3154
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2009, 23:06:09 pm »
If you check well my project section you will see that i explained this very well...

I need to make more tests on this using also two coils or bifilar coils i already have but more parts are needed and i have 0 money anyway i'm trying to get some investors to finish it here. I got many interest around here.. .

It could be series resonance in the middle of a parallel resonance maybe the series coil serves to get around of the dielectric proprieties of water... when in parallel it develop a very high impedance for input this mean that it behave like a capacitor (actually like an AC battery that can accumulate many KWatts of power) that when is charged will have less capacity to fill so very very high input impedance is developed, in series on XL XC cancel each other and so you will have at resonance 0 impedance because the impedance of the capacitor is negative value and that from the inductor is positive.

Nice to see you want to learn

I left everything there and on the link to stanley meyer the true on energeticforum you find everything on my project section

#### Hidden

• Moderator
• Sr. member
• Posts: 457
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #11 on: December 22, 2009, 15:24:23 pm »
\$ 1 5.0E-6 10.20027730826997 50 5.0 50
R 336 112 336 16 0 0 40.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
r 336 112 336 160 0 1.0
w 336 160 432 160 0
w 336 160 272 160 0
w 272 160 272 240 0
w 432 160 432 192 0
r 432 192 432 240 0 10.0
c 272 240 272 304 0 1.0E-5 -5.3906400123737015
l 432 240 432 304 0 1.0 0.2013709064857632
w 272 304 336 304 0
w 336 304 336 336 0
w 336 304 432 304 0
r 336 336 336 384 0 1.0
f 240 400 336 400 0 1.5
g 336 416 336 448 0
R 240 400 192 400 0 5 50.23 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
d 336 416 336 384 1 0.805904783
w 432 160 512 160 0
w 432 240 512 240 0
c 512 160 512 240 0 1.0000000000000001E-11 2.0137094598755425
o 12 64 0 289 0.078125 0.8 0 -1
o 6 64 0 289 1.25 0.4 1 -1
o 6 64 0 34 5.0 0.2 2 -1

#### Hidden

• Moderator
• Sr. member
• Posts: 457
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2009, 15:36:12 pm »
\$ 1 5.0E-6 10.20027730826997 50 5.0 50
r 480 112 480 160 0 1.0
w 480 160 416 160 0
w 416 160 416 240 0
r 576 192 576 240 0 5.0
c 416 240 416 304 0 1.0E-5 44.81433375855282
l 576 240 576 304 0 0.1 0.17927179349726774
w 416 304 480 304 0
w 480 304 480 336 0
w 480 304 576 304 0
r 480 336 480 384 0 1.0
f 384 400 480 400 0 1.5
g 480 416 480 448 0
R 384 400 336 400 0 5 159.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
d 480 416 480 384 1 0.805904783
d 576 192 576 160 1 0.805904783
d 544 160 544 192 1 0.805904783
r 544 192 544 240 0 5.0
w 544 240 576 240 0
w 480 160 544 160 0
w 544 160 576 160 0
d 480 64 480 112 1 0.805904783
R 480 64 416 64 0 0 40.0 48.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
o 9 64 0 289 0.15625 0.2 0 -1
o 3 64 0 289 2.5 0.8 1 -1
o 3 64 0 290 2.5 0.8 2 -1
o 16 64 0 33 2.5 0.8 3 -1
o 16 64 0 34 2.5 0.8 4 -1
o 21 64 1 291 10.0 9.765625E-5 5 -1
o 16 64 1 35 5.0 9.765625E-5 6 -1
o 3 64 1 35 1.25 9.765625E-5 7 -1

this would be sufficient to build in reality.

#### Hidden

• Global Moderator
• Hero member
• Posts: 3154
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2009, 15:47:36 pm »
very nice simulation look at with much attention

#### Hidden

• Sr. member
• Posts: 434
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2009, 16:00:53 pm »
The only problem I see is that it has not opposite potential in sync.

br
Webmug

#### Hidden

• Moderator
• Sr. member
• Posts: 457
##### Re: My new approach
« Reply #15 on: December 23, 2009, 10:39:30 am »
The only problem I see is that it has not opposite potential in sync.

br
Webmug
this would be conventional electrolysis. as you see there are only ~2V at the tubes.