Author Topic: What did Stan meyer really said.......  (Read 8478 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Hidden

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3741
    • water structure and science
Re: What did Stan meyer really say.......
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2008, 12:11:15 pm »
The resonant cavity of Stan Meyer in practice.

Please have a goooooooooooooood look at this picture and think what happens in this cavity when it is filled with water and you have power on it......
Please reply this this question. I wanna teach you all here something, if you wanna know how Stan got resonance....

br
Steve



I meant that if you use a chamber like Stan showed in his technotes, you will get the following thing happening
The thing is that his cavity  has a small opening on the bottum and top.
What will happen is that the chamber first, is fllled with water. After starting up, it will be soon a 90% of bubbles.
Bubbles do not conduct.
Amps are restricted.
That was my found theory...
Bubbles still do not conduct.....but i couldnt get the amps down as far i wished for. I tried that cavity.
So, yes, the content between the plates changes from water to gassoup with at the bottum a low level of water....

br
Steve

alvas

  • Guest
Re: What did Stan meyer really said.......
« Reply #17 on: July 21, 2008, 19:30:29 pm »

What ? Stanley Meyer secrets?????!!!


 http://www.more-per-gallon.com/Meyers-Secrets.pdf





Kind Regards





« Last Edit: September 21, 2008, 21:13:54 pm by goodluck »

Online Hidden

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3741
    • water structure and science
Re: What did Stan meyer really said.......
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2008, 09:36:25 am »


What ? Stanley Meyer secrets?????!!!


 http://www.more-per-gallon.com/Meyers-Secrets.pdf

Can`t find the 1200 v ac inverter anywhere he mentioned, can it be 1200 w he ment?..
Kind Regards
Alvas

Hi Alvas

I know the whole Tad and ted storys.
I happen to have 2 such a neon setups..actually 3, but i blew one up.
The question to solve in that case is if one ofr both tubes are insulated.
Secondly, if the tubes where not insulated, what the capacitance would be of the cell.

br
Steve

waterfalcon

  • Guest
Re: What did Stan meyer really said.......
« Reply #19 on: July 26, 2008, 21:51:46 pm »
I have never tested the production of this cell however my last cell used the same container. So im guessing right at or over 500 cc's a min, i feel thats a close guess for now. i've only had this cell together for about 2 days now.

About heating the gas, i have ran several test on this, 3 to be exact. Relaxation was my first test it worked very well! Heat was my second test, its temp sensitive and not worth the hassle at all, to hot and the hydroxy dies. The third test was ionization which was the most easiest to do. The engine spuddered threw all 3 test, but the ionization promised more than the others. I seen that the engine could idel with more gas, im pretty sure around 700 cc's would idel it by way of ionization based on what i seen, and i think if you seen what i did youd think the same!

After i added the bubbler to my cell i failed to replicate my own work of the ionization process, i think this is due to the bubbler and pressure hoses. I'm using a bigger fatter hose then i was before and im getting bloops and not a steady flow, bloops break the connections in the gas so im not doing to great on that right now. it's important that i find a very small hose since im using a bubbler, i need a steady flow for this to work no bloops in the line.

To see that engine run on ionized gas was cool, it sounded like a diesel! i built the pressure up and cut the alternator off, slowly released the gas threw the bug zapper and i could hear the engine running on hydroxy as long as the psi gauge droped a fair bit, but it wasn't to bad.I cant run the alternator and driver motor for the engine or i'll trip a breaker..  It sounded week but was running with the starter motor, this is why i believe laser injection will make the gas less like diesel and more like gasoline, stan used it.  Stan could have ionized his gas better than i did that day, he could have been producing more than i was, or he may be like you said, a damn liar.

who knows?

I am near my last steps in determining if this is a hoax, or possible, stan was smart and its possible i may drop out rather than dedicating my entire life to figuring it out, its really hard when your the only one that can perform the test to both rule in and out what is and what is not possible based on the data that is available to us,, and lately its been a drag... So my cell is built and im kicking back and maybe taking my time on finding the hose that will give me the proper pressure due to the problems in pressure the bubbler causes. I know what i seen when i ionized the gas both with my eyes and ears when the engine somewhat ran on such low amounts of gas.

it would be  a dream to see someone take this further,, such a slow moving progress..



Can you tell me what engine you were testing your cell with. Meaning single cylinder, 4 cylinder 6, 8?  Was it a car or a portable generator?

thanks hydrocars