Author Topic: making lots of small bubbles into single large(r) bubbles  (Read 2971 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hidden

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 343
making lots of small bubbles into single large(r) bubbles
« on: May 16, 2008, 21:36:48 pm »
Outer tube capped with pin hole at top to collect all the bubbles and making big ones output.

I found the pin hole has to be "tuned" for the amount of output.

If power is lowered from optimum, the solid bubbles wont work correctly and in the same sense, if you are producing too much for the hole, the gases will come out the bottom of the inner tube.


« Last Edit: June 27, 2008, 01:32:19 am by CarbedNotch »

Offline Hidden

  • Jr. member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: LOOK!!! Fog/Mist = Wasted HHO
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2008, 23:02:25 pm »
The guy from Waterforfuel.com has been doing it this way also.  He also uses a 3 tube setup.

LapperL

mrgalleria

  • Guest
Re: LOOK!!! Fog/Mist = Wasted HHO
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2008, 03:31:14 am »
Aloha,
Won't capping the cells inhibit liquid circulation, which could simultaniously inhibit gas formation, as the gases are not freely unrestricted?
Before you recommend this, you may want to check production before and after installing caps.
Bill

Offline Hidden

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 343
Re: LOOK!!! Fog/Mist = Wasted HHO
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2008, 04:00:13 am »
Aloha,
Won't capping the cells inhibit liquid circulation, which could simultaniously inhibit gas formation, as the gases are not freely unrestricted?
Before you recommend this, you may want to check production before and after installing caps.
Bill

I have.

mrgalleria

  • Guest
Re: LOOK!!! Fog/Mist = Wasted HHO
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2008, 04:20:19 am »
Aloha,
CarbedNotch- You said "I have".
What were your results?
Were they done under vacuum?
Is there any results of validation, as in mileage improvements comparisons or generator run times?
As you are recommending this as the "new standard", it's important to know these things.
Bill

Offline Hidden

  • Sr. member
  • ***
  • Posts: 343
Re: LOOK!!! Fog/Mist = Wasted HHO
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2008, 02:42:43 am »
Aloha,
CarbedNotch- You said "I have".
What were your results?
Were they done under vacuum?
Is there any results of validation, as in mileage improvements comparisons or generator run times?
As you are recommending this as the "new standard", it's important to know these things.
Bill


I do know that its impossible to ignite the hho when its underwater and also Stan's demonstration cell was under no vacuum.