Author Topic: Retry N1001  (Read 6125 times)

Hidden and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178
Today my birthday and the birthday of new world
« Reply #80 on: July 01, 2018, 17:03:06 pm »
I´m starting the coils today

i decided that the coils will be under oil to get rid of air... and make it harder to burn the coils

going to set my winding machine up and start doing the coils... the number of turns is going to be somewhat smaller because i´m with an idea of using a bias current to saturate the core in the opposite direction and thereto this dc will also get to the cell somehow i didnt decided yet how... or i can only apply in a small section of the coil 

probably another small transformer to get this few amps to a coil going thru a choke just like they show on the document in attachment few posts earlier

Using better thr flux swing of the core with both sides allow faster discharge  and reset of the core!!! Basically less turns are required since you can use the 4 factor instead of 2 in the calculation... 

magnets can also be used for it but they need to have a spacer to have a regulation of the magnetic field ... i did experiments in the past is in my youtube channel where is show that using a magnet on a toroid interfered in the output and input levels

it was a long time ago now and at that time i didnt have the knowledge i have today..

i´m not sure if the permanent magnets are going to lose their magnetism but will work likely for a long time








Offline Hidden

  • Administrator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3876
    • water structure and science
Re: Retry N1001
« Reply #81 on: July 02, 2018, 08:21:44 am »
happy birthday, Fabio!!!!
May it bring the results you are hoping for!

your friend
Steve

Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178
Coils organization
« Reply #82 on: July 02, 2018, 12:32:07 pm »
Hello Steve thanks a lot my friend !

i worked a little yesterday and today going to try complete the coils...

it seems to me that the best way to go is to get first L3 closer to the core because it need to capture the core energy better
 
over it should go the primary and over the primary L2 since it will have a high current flowing for some time it better have a decent current dissipation...

as we are pulsing the L3 wont see a 5 amps for long time so it wont dissipate much however if the resistance is to big it will have a voltage drop inside the coil! for example 5 amps if it had 100 ohms resistance it would lose 500v out of 5kv  ... also it must not fuse! so maybe a too thin wire could become a problem.. we want the power to go to the water not heating up coils

the primary will have a peak of 30 amps but its not 30 amps dc is a saw and there is the off time too so average should be only 8 amps

the secondary should give 10 amps to the chokes too so its going to have a dissipation similar to the primary the 10 peak amps should apear as 2,5 average




Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178
The T1 Design
« Reply #83 on: July 03, 2018, 00:43:37 am »
here is the design of T1 in attachment

i made the drawing in photoshop so is possible to manipulate it to explore how its wired and arranged

Please everyone consider donating ... the lack of money is not helping at all... if everyone reading here donate just like 10 dollars would be a great help and would help cover the money i´m expending on credit but not have! 


Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178
small mistake
« Reply #84 on: July 03, 2018, 02:05:24 am »
I made a mistake assuming the energy at the core one will be the same as the energy at core two... since the core two is working more as a charging choke than transformer and the T1 is working as a transfomer

actually the energy of T1 is going to be much smaller than T2 because the secondary will have a current during charging that opposes the energy into the primary... the canceling is not complete however because coupling is not perfect

so the energy accumulated is dependent on the coupling between primary and secondary...

the lower the coupling the higher will be the amps in primary that wont couple to the secondary during charging so L3 can capture and use on the discharge

i´m trying to figure how to balance the two systems into one discharge without get unbalance...

this should change my plans to make t1 1:3:6 and t2 1:1

the main idea is to combine all the power in a single spike

T2 will have a gap and maybe t1 as well to allow some energy to be accumulated

for adjusting the gap im going to use pieces of iron lamination on the lateral legs of the EE core leaving the gap only on the center leg!

« Last Edit: July 03, 2018, 02:23:31 am by sebosfato »

Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178
Auto Reset pulse doubling
« Reply #85 on: July 03, 2018, 02:25:45 am »
There is also another important impact of having the energy being accumulated at T2 forces the T1 to reset instantly specially if the energy in the t2 is greater than t1 or its not well balanced..  T1 will accumulate some of the energy of the T2 discharge back that will have a pulse doubling effect just after T2 energy is gone T1 L3 and L2 will send a sharp positive pulse again! and is probably the right time to re-apply the pulsing !!!!! This could allow the use of a very high duty cycle like 95% or higher  however the t2 core can also saturate... thinking about this i was lead to believe that the gating may be important because of this too. after all the unipolar mistery is coming out

the dc source diodes must survive the back pulsing is a good idea to add a tvs across it to protect just below the diodes voltage rating.. is a good idea to add a filter capacitor small size just to keep the peak controlled if it happens...

i believe the scr can hold voltage in both senses so it can be the best way to go!@!!!@!!@!@!!!!! 

i think the coil for the ecc thereto can be at whatever core so i haven't decided yet where i´m going to put it

i´m thinking about visiting a transformers factory  to get some help .. or at the university of electrical engineering





« Last Edit: July 03, 2018, 02:59:35 am by sebosfato »

Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178

Online Hidden

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3178
electric wormhole
« Reply #87 on: July 04, 2018, 02:36:22 am »
In meyers Patents he claim to be generating hydrogen by subatomic interaction with water molecules... he claims that the bond force of the water is weakened when a resonant condition which increase the cell resistance happen

subatomic force is the weak force... the force thru witch quarks can be exchanged causing decay.. this decay is probably electrons in the case of water...

it appear to me that the patent from john quincy st clair on water spliting claim more or less the same thing.. he also say that when the water is in this wormhole generator the water bonds are weakened and the hydrogen even decay

when an atom receive a subatomic particle like neutrinos etc they interact by causing decay...

john Q have a way to do it electrically but he didnt patented that ,, he only mention in one of his patents that there is a electric wormhole generator besides the magnetic...

My best guess is that when meyer says in the videos that electromagnetic force comands all other forces he mean it... weak force is weaker than electromagnetic force.. .

maybe those mystery numbers and diagrams will come alive

he probably new that if he give a too fast pulse to water at a certain frequency this wormhole opens up weakening the water bonds and freeing up loads of electrons

this resulting gas is even magnetizable according to one of his patents of gas electrical hydrogen genertor