Author Topic: Did Stan Meyer's voltage zones change polarity with each pulse?  (Read 910 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Hidden

  • Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 229
Did Stan Meyer's voltage zones change polarity with each pulse?
« on: November 17, 2011, 22:59:47 pm »
Tony W's VIC waveforms show AC which is 180 degrees out pf phase at each connection.

In a series circuit with a diode there will be no AC. However, the coils themselves have a capacitance which turns them into parallel tank circuits. Whether or not there is a diode in the circuit the parallel tank circuits will oscillate and create AC.

The 180 degree out of phase ac at the voltage zones means that when one voltage zone is positive the other will be negative and with each pulse the voltage zones will change polarity. In this case the water molecules will be stretched but will also collide. This seems to resonate with what Stan Meyer has termed "Resonant Action" in which collision causes disassociation? Although when Meyer mentions "Resonant Action" he seems to be talking more about ions colliding with the molecules?

What do you guys think, is the polarity changing with each pulse?



Offline Hidden

  • Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 238
Re: Did Stan Meyer's voltage zones change polarity with each pulse?
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2011, 01:42:06 am »
I ran a quick simulation and it looks as if the bottom choke is voltage output is switching between positive and negative but the top choke is staying positive because of the diode. I took a picture, take a look. The sales manual really outlines the importance of ion collision for the resonance cell. Do you think its possible to have both a static field and an alternating field?

Offline Hidden

  • Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 229
Re: Did Stan Meyer's voltage zones change polarity with each pulse?
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2011, 02:05:08 am »
I'm not sure, I don't want to rule it out though. The vic resonance is something
That really gets me. I tend to think it's the chokes self resonance, which forms a
parallel tank that would limit current and provide an ac frequency, but the ac should
 be rectified by the diode and any series component (i.e. The water cap) would only
get the dc.

Bottom line is, there exists ac in this circuit, how it gets to the water capacitor
Is my question.

Offline Hidden

  • Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 229
Re: Did Stan Meyer's voltage zones change polarity with each pulse?
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2011, 10:38:03 am »
I have tried and tried to get the pulse doubling effect on multisim but no luck. I have also tried to get AC to the water cap and again no luck? Just wondering again how the AC is occuring in a series circuit with a diode?

Offline Hidden

  • Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 229
Re: Did Stan Meyer's voltage zones change polarity with each pulse?
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2011, 08:17:38 am »
First off the oscope waveforms are from Tony's site Globalkast.com....Thanks to him for all the contributions he has made.


Description: "Signal from my VIC Transformer at resonance at each output, voltage is 180 degrees out of phase ( separated view )."


 Since each connection provides AC that is 180 out of phase then each voltage zone will change polarity with each pulse as you can see above.

When the two pulses combine they look like this:

The above looks exactly like Meyer's waveforms, but we should realize that the signal is made up of 2 AC signals which are 180 out of phase. All the positive pulses do not go to the positive side of the capacitor as Meyer's diagrams seem to show. All the negative pulses do not go to the negative side of the capacitor as Meyer's diagrams seem to show.

This still is very confusing to me, and I guess everyone else, if it were simple we would have all figured it out by now.